Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Bucking Bar 07-06-2013 08:46 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1440155)
We would keep the autopilot on and try to figure out a way to VNAV it. Maybe borrow the ILS to do an NDB approach or something.

:D

I thought Douglas VNAV was an NDB and the ability to rapidly calculate 300 ft / NM based on 3 miles per minute, you mean it isn't? Isn't the standard way to change frequencies to tower; "sorry, was that a problem for you ?"

The beauty of the 737 system is that if the FO's RA is out the Captain and LCA still have the left side and the HUGS, so they sit over there and critique the FO's hand flying to SA CATIII standards at 02:30 in the morning after a runway change 6 miles from the airport (or at least that's my experience with it).

forgot to bid 07-06-2013 08:59 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1440161)
I thought Douglas VNAV was an NDB and the ability to rapidly calculate 300 ft / NM based on 3 miles per minute, you mean it isn't? Isn't the standard way to change frequencies to tower; "sorry, was that a problem for you ?"

If the altitude restriction is 19,000-23,000 AT 280, the MD-90 will cross it at 23,250 and 330 and after it passes go to 280. :D And don't even get me started on that dumb Freedom arrival to DCA from DTW.


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1440161)
The beauty of the 737 system is that if the FO's RA is out the Captain and LCA still have the left side and the HUGS, so they sit over there and critique the FO's hand flying to SA CATIII standards at 02:30 in the morning after a runway change 6 miles from the airport (or at least that's my experience with it).

http://i.imgur.com/qHjeQJM.jpg

Bucking Bar 07-06-2013 09:09 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1440168)
If the altitude restriction is 19,000-23,000 AT 280, the MD-90 will cross it at 23,250 and 330 and after it passes go to 280. :D
[/img]

The Douglas logo was inspired by an MD product attempting to meet a crossing restriction while slowing down.


The next nutjob member of the press who writes an advocacy piece for the "Autonomous Airliners of the Future" really should be strapped to a Douglas jet.

biigD 07-06-2013 09:10 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1440155)
I don't think I've ever flown a Douglas with the RA out so I don't know for sure.

The only thing I've noticed are the lack of GPWS callouts just prior to touchdown. And even then that's not a problem if the PF just uses whatever DFGC has the working RA. Of course it's more fun if neither pilot remembers any of this:

PNF: "Oh ****, twenty feet!"

PF: "Oh ****!"

THWAM!

forgot to bid 07-06-2013 09:20 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1440175)
The Douglas logo was inspired by an MD product attempting to meet a crossing restriction while slowing down.


The next nutjob member of the press who writes an advocacy piece for the "Autonomous Airliners of the Future" really should be strapped to a Douglas jet.

LOL. I'll never look at that the same way again.

Bucking Bar 07-06-2013 09:23 AM


Originally Posted by biigD (Post 1440177)
The only thing I've noticed are the lack of GPWS callouts just prior to touchdown. And even then that's not a problem if the PF just uses whatever DFGC has the working RA. Of course it's more fun if neither pilot remembers any of this:

PNF: "Oh ****, twenty feet!"

PF: "Oh ****!"

THWAM!

he he he ffffl.....

Columbia 07-06-2013 09:30 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1440123)

The 717 does appear to be more growth than shrinkage at the mainline, even though the total network continues to shrink. How long can we keep shrinking, and what is our plan as we become more expensive as we shrink and the fantasy growth airlines (foreign and domestic) keep barfing countless hundreds of capacity aircraft into the system, while the only trick in our bag is to shrink to squeeze yields and quarter over quarter/YoY margins?

The company's fiduciary responsibility is to the stockholders by increasing the stock price. Consolidation, large RJs with lower costs, code sharing, and joint ventures all contribute to increased stock price, especially in the near term. Expect the water to be awfully cold.

tsquare 07-06-2013 09:47 AM


Originally Posted by TOGA LK (Post 1440106)
Sadly I long for the day a company like Emirates can hire into some decent bases, I'd be long gone.

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

johnso29 07-06-2013 09:57 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1440114)
So all you were concerned about with your not one more seat and not one more pound stuff was the pencil whipped weight of the EMB-175 but not the quantity of EMB-175/CRJ-900s?

Hold the line on DCI airframes, seating capacity, & certified MGTOW. That was what I wanted. That was accomplished. The total number of airframes actually decreased. Unfortunately the number of 76 seaters allowed was increased, which is why I voted NO. However, the TOTAL number of DCI airframes and seats was decreased.

johnso29 07-06-2013 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by TOGA LK (Post 1440106)
Other airlines with similar post-deregulation demographics are hiring. A widebody fleet less than half the size of everyone else and intl code shares/joint ventures aren't helping. Those are contractual items. To answer your question, yes ALPA has created stagnation, revitalized the RJ industry and set us on a solid path towards being like the merchant marines. Sadly I long for the day a company like Emirates can hire into some decent bases, I'd be long gone.

The only reason those other airlines are hiring now, is because their Age 65 retirements have come earlier. I have several friends that fly for United. They tell me the operation is a trainwreck. A friend of mine on the B737 waited 3 hours in ORD for brakes to arrive. That's one of UALs biggest hubs! And they didn't have replacement parts?

And I don't think Emirates will EVER have a base anywhere but in the UAE. Those pesky unions would impose actual contractual obligations, thereby reducing their efficiencies and eating into their profits.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands