![]() |
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1422593)
Sailing;
I don't believe one word of this post. And I am not calling you a liar. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1422603)
Cloud's a good word for it. The economy is cleared for takeoff except it's fogged in and it's ORD and the 10-9s were ripped out.
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3357/3...07bb6213_z.jpg Yeah the housing market where I am is going gangbusters. I'd make money on my house and if I sold it for the comps in the neighborhood I'd make more than paid plus everything we've put into it. And there is pent up demand supposedly throughout the economy from years of not spending money. All good signs but there are plenty of canaries in the coal mine that look really sick. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1422605)
That's exactly what you are calling me. Regardless that is straight from people involved in the process. The offered more pay to run more seats at DCI.
|
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1422600)
Just misinformed.
I think that's our motto around here. :D |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1422605)
That's exactly what you are calling me. Regardless that is straight from people involved in the process. The offered more pay to run more seats at DCI.
|
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 1421986)
You nailed it.
It was actually a SPOT scenario that had an MEL before we went flying into the W/S, to be fair...Still far too many "right" places to find stuff. I didn't even mention the Airway Manual :cool: |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1422584)
RA is very up to speed on the economy.
Is it possible his reticence to hire is fueled by a belief that another economic meltdown is imminent? Or is does his new position in charge of the IATA indicate that top-end outsourcing is about to kick into overdrive? However, I think Delta is not hiring because the last contract has made them slightly overstaffed. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1422611)
The fact is that what you are stating completely goes against what many of us have seen RA (and others in senior mgmt) state about the E190 on a number of occasions.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 1422642)
Management floated the E190 rumor because they wanted a compromise on more 76 seat jets. However, they got the scope exchange instead. You always ask for double what you want; management negotiation 101.
Conflicting reports of mgmt asking for more seats allowed on the 76 seaters (up to 82) were floated, but that was after the contract was out for a vote. When I spoke with those involved in the process before it came to a vote, they adamantly stated that mgmt had NOT come to them for any seat relief. |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 1422642)
Management floated the E190 rumor because they wanted a compromise on more 76 seat jets. However, they got the scope exchange instead. You always ask for double what you want; management negotiation 101.
I can hear you laughing. :D Just give me a few minutes to look back through the threads from this time last year and I'll find just that. Then I'll hear your face palming. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands