Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2013 | 08:50 AM
  #134251  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You know better than that Bar. Category was the exact primary consideration. It sure the hell wasn't longevity. The only slight modification from a pure category ratio was the small number of pull and plug. And the number of pulled & plugged pilots equaled the number of fNWA pilots that retired early within months of the SLI. Double that number now 3+ years later. You guys won the merger case, we lost it. Period. Life goes on.

Carl
Primary was relative seniority, not category, FWIW
Old 07-04-2013 | 08:59 AM
  #134252  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

I was under the impression that personal medical information is confidential. If I have to send/fax my medical information, even in general terms, to some phone number at the company, that is obviously not private. This doesn't seem right to me. If I am required to send in a doctors note stating the general nature of my illness, maybe "he wasn't feeling 100%" will do.
Old 07-04-2013 | 09:01 AM
  #134253  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Primary was relative seniority, not category, FWIW
Fine. Relative (ratioed) seniority with two airlines that had similar equipment. No difference.

Your perennial whining about pull and plug is what's silly. It was a few hundred guys. Your side correctly worried about what would happen if those guys didn't retire and stayed til 65. Instead, that number of guys retired early months after the SLI was printed. Since then, over double that number have left early...exactly what we told the arbitrator would happen. But the arbitrator didn't buy it and only gave us partial credit for those guys. That's what happens when you lose.

Life goes on. But I hope you don't have these discussions around fNWA guys. Kicking sand in the losers' face is unwise.

Carl
Old 07-04-2013 | 09:02 AM
  #134254  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by daldude
The above highlighted area is the reality that you recognize as good. What should be happening is rather than being displaced every bid there should be advanced entitlements every bid. When that happens there are very few displacements. But you have never experienced that so you just assume that what you are currently experiencing is the norm and there for good.

I hope that one day you will have the opportunity to know what actual advancement is but I'm a little skeptical for the next 5-7 years, since it appears they are going to use the 75/76 to fund the 717 and 737. Or at least that is what they said 2 days ago in the crew resources letter.
I really don't see what's difficult to understand. The company utilizes the 757/767 less the PMDL. In addition to that, planned 757 retirements are approaching. That will result in displacements. Plain and simple. Smaller bases will feel the displacements more.

Originally Posted by flyallnite
Apparently though that isn't the case. Questions are being asked! The company is already making calls to pilots in the first few weeks of the program. If you DON'T answer the phone, you can expect not to be paid for your sick leave. Did we have THAT in the last contract? So that's not really a choice that works for most of us, is it?

The company is using the loophole created by the "good faith basis" language in the contract to require verification from whomever it deems worthy of harassment. THAT's the bottom line. Call your rep all you want, we codified this behavior and now it's the law. Although I suspect this completely violates the HIPAA Act of 1996.

From a company email yesterday:

"Q5.5: My CPO calls me regarding a good faith basis to inquire into the medical reason for my use of sick leave. Do I need to provide verification?

A5.5: It depends. Based on the discussion, your CPO may either (1) consider the current sick leave occurrence to be verified, or (2) require you to provide verification."

So, "BASED ON THE DISCUSSION"- I may be required to provide verification...

I guess that pretty much leaves it up to the CPO to decide, doesn't it? If I don't answer the phone, I'm not going to be getting paid sick leave, am I? What will my reps do to have my sick leave paid if I don't have this "discussion"? I suspect the answer is "nothing" because we specifically authorized this new sick leave harassment policy. We authorized it and the company created a NEW DEPARTMENT to administer it. Enjoy!

Who told you that you can expect to not get paid? I don't see that anywhere. If you're not tapped out on your 100 hours of unverified sick time then you'll get paid. Don't answer your phone. You don't have to.
Old 07-04-2013 | 09:10 AM
  #134255  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Who told you that you can expect to not get paid? I don't see that anywhere. If you're not tapped out on your 100 hours of unverified sick time then you'll get paid. Don't answer your phone. You don't have to.
If you are required to provide verification in order to use sick leave, and you don't provide verification, do you think you'll get paid? Nobody else in the company gets paid. Why would it be any different for us? You are doling out bad advice. If you don't play the game and verify your sick leave if and when requested by the CPO, you ain't gettin' paid. Period.
Old 07-04-2013 | 09:17 AM
  #134256  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Happy July 4th!!!!!

And word to the wise, careful driving through 80ktsclamp's neighborhood when he's letting the fireworks go...


As 80 said "well, that sucked, I didn't mean for it to go so high!"

Seriously would post "firework fails" from youtube but the profanity is too much. I think the F word is everyones favorite when $10 bombs go off in their face.
Old 07-04-2013 | 09:24 AM
  #134257  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Fine. Relative (ratioed) seniority with two airlines that had similar equipment. No difference.

Life goes on. But I hope you don't have these discussions around fNWA guys. Kicking sand in the losers' face is unwise.

Carl
The two airlines did not have similar equipment. Given the level of dissention on "Super Premium," it would seem that you in particular would be aware of the differences, so much so that you placed a fence around your desired flying.

On my end of the list, the differences were more dramatic. 76ER lineholders were merged with DC9 FO's, many of whom did not want to return to their NWA jobs and were out on furlough bypass. Along those lines, some of the A320 guys probably felt robbed too.

It is what it is. I'll be polite, but damned if I'll cower.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler

Life goes on. But I hope you don't have these discussions around fNWA guys. Kicking sand in the losers' face is unwise.

Carl
Same as I told the 63 YO f-NWA 73A who was explaining his 4.5 million dollar retirement set up, plus defined plan (which candidly I did not understand ... told him I had nothing before, or after, does not matter to me, but there are some who lost a lot that probably would not be as receptive to the conversation)
Old 07-04-2013 | 09:24 AM
  #134258  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
If you are required to provide verification in order to use sick leave, and you don't provide verification, do you think you'll get paid? Nobody else in the company gets paid. Why would it be any different for us? You are doling out bad advice. If you don't play the game and verify your sick leave if and when requested by the CPO, you ain't gettin' paid. Period.
Actually, I think that you're simply making an assumption. I'm not doing out any advice. I'm simply stating fact. Contractually we receive 100 hours on UNVERIFIED sick time per year.

I'm out for now. Time to grill and drink beer. Happy 4th.
Old 07-04-2013 | 09:27 AM
  #134259  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

A couple of weeks ago I caught a summer cold. Called in sick. Sucked. I hate making that call because you know they don't believe you.

Anyways I got better and flew a trip and then another, but on that second trip my left ear didn't clear on landing. I had no warning it was coming, not even a sniffle. It was hell. It took seeing a doctor and getting a prescription to make the pain subside after about 7-9 days. It took 3 weeks to restore hearing.

My whole hating sick callers meme is based off of one keyboard warrior on here who said if you can type on the internet you can go to work. That's 100% b.s. You've got to be damn near perfect to fly when you think about the liability involved with our job.

I'm sure if we worked in an office setting we'd down some medicine and go sit in the cubicle with a runny nose. I know I would. But to fly a jetliner several times a day for a few days straight? Screw that, FLY AN MD-88?!?


You can't always go to the doctor for the trivial stuff and our insurance punished that, but the trivial stuff keeps us from being where we need to be do to our jobs right.
Old 07-04-2013 | 09:35 AM
  #134260  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Actually, I think that you're simply making an assumption. I'm not doing out any advice. I'm simply stating fact. Contractually we receive 100 hours on UNVERIFIED sick time per year.

I'm out for now. Time to grill and drink beer. Happy 4th.
It's you who are making an assumption. The company can, on a good faith basis, require you to verify any sick leave, including the first 100 hours. This is already happening. You are telling guys not to answer calls from the CPO regarding verification. I am telling them that if they don't, they had best check their time card and plan accordingly.

I'm outta here too.

Happy 4th to you as well!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices