![]() |
|
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 1443235)
Wonder if the aircraft was FOQA equipped?
The 777 does have Quick Access Recorder or QAR which may provide more information than the FDR if it wasnt damaged in the crash. The QAR was missing data in the BA crash the QAR but had data the FDR did not like the position of the Fuel Metering Valves. This is why I'm not a big fan of partial information. The QAR has data that the CVR and FDR do not. |
Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
(Post 1443239)
This is why I'm not a big fan of partial information.
Can you advise:
If you review the Board's work on the Gulfstream G650 accident, the Board went beyond the actions of the crew to the complete lack of a safety culture at Gulfstream. The Board was unusually critical of program management at the senior levels of the organization ... the Board, on the basis of objective data went beyond the "what" of the accident to the "why." This Board, more so than in the past, is a friend of pilots. If the pilots were some how deficient, we should want to understand why, identify the patterns and seek corrective actions applied also. Many industry insiders have opined the culture at these carriers undermines safety. Cheap, unqualified, pilots are promoted. Those who seek a higher standard are fired. Seems like ALPA would be all for shining a flashlight in this corner. |
Interesting fact: the ICAO cannot mandate anything. They can only set a SARP recommending contracting states make regulatory actions to mandate some action or equipment.
GF |
Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
(Post 1443229)
Where did I say IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION should be withheld? You're just being silly. I'd expect an emergency grounding like the 787 if they knew this kind of information. I said the truth should be released, but with contextual information. The BA plane had RR engines and this has P&W. Either way both engine manufacturers had time to look and fix the issues. I'd expect an uproar from the NTSB and FAA if there was an icing rollback issue, but there wasn't. The FDR data is not a substitute for an engine teardown and that's why the engines are flying home to Connecticut to be inspected. The probability is that the FDR data is correct and the engines worked as they were intended but the NTSB said they appeared to do so. The engine manufacturer won't be cleared until the engine is inspected and there may still be an issue. The press isn't doing due diligence and that hurts us as professional aviators. All for truth just not happy about the press focusing in on the soundbites provided directly by the NTSB.
The larger issue is "were the engines working properly?" Answer, seems so. If the engines hadn't worked but they didn't know why then should they remain quiet for a little while? I don't think so. After all, what if the RR fix hadn't been the total solution? Again a hypothetical question but how long should they remain quiet in the interest of protecting the pilots? |
Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
(Post 1443231)
Flight 214 Crash: Pilots Initially Ordered Flight Attendants Not To Evacuate |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1443246)
Understood and agreed. You seem to have a greater than average understanding of the process and information.
Can you advise:
If you review the Board's work on the Gulfstream G650 accident, the Board went beyond the actions of the crew to the complete lack of a safety culture at Gulfstream. The Board was unusually critical of program management at the senior levels of the organization ... the Board, on the basis of objective data went beyond the "what" of the accident to the "why." This Board, more so than in the past, is a friend of pilots. If the pilots were some how deficient, we should want to understand why, identify the patterns and seek corrective actions applied also. Many industry insiders have opined the culture at these carriers undermines safety. Cheap, unqualified, pilots are promoted. Those who seek a higher standard are fired. Seems like ALPA would be all for shining a flashlight in this corner. The press didn't even cover the school in Africa that had a gunman kill 29 children because we were talking about a crash that nearly everyone survived. Where's the outrage for dead children in Africa...? As fascinating as the crash is, we have a job to do and part of that job is not to judge others in a way we wouldn't want to be judged. How fickle can this forum get? It goes from ALPA should have spoken up to ALPA shouldn't have said a word. There's no winning when every response is the opposite just because. This forum has become so solemn and gloomy that even the other board sucks now because the guys here have gone there to rain on everyone's parade. I've never seen so many people screaming for a response then sh18ing on the response. I am all for safety and factual information in context but (and this is the kicker here) on a webboard full of black helicopter tin foil wearing pessimists, you guys are questioning whether the NTSB may go too far on the future in publicizing your life in the even of an incident to satisfy a honey boo boo audience? |
Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
(Post 1443202)
You are willing to give up the right to due process for pilots It's not a criminal investigation/proceeding. Let's face it: in this day and age the public demands instant gratification. Even so, these pilots are a damn sight better off than if they'd crashed in most other countries. |
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 1443250)
Interesting fact: the ICAO cannot mandate anything. They can only set a SARP recommending contracting states make regulatory actions to mandate some action or equipment.
GF Pilots were concerned about what would happen with the data and how it would be used. Sounds like a good discussion theme. What data can and should be used and how should it be released knowing it could be you someday. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1443279)
Is that not normal? :eek:
Flight 214 Crash: Pilots Initially Ordered Flight Attendants Not To Evacuate |
Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
(Post 1443296)
What data can and should be used and how should it be released knowing it could be you someday.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands