Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

bigbusdriver 07-11-2013 04:34 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1443366)
It's not interesting because it's not a fact. ICAO can't mandate anything.

Since your hypersensitivity started when ALPA embarrassed themselves by releasing that slam against the NTSB, I can only assume you're getting a lot of your "facts" from ALPA. Maybe you guys should wait and gather all your facts in context before you speak publicly anymore. ;)

Carl

Already answered that 'Mr Attack the Messenger and I'll say your an ALPA guy because that will destroy your credibility because I'm Carl and I'm mean." It is an ICAO mandate not mandated by ICAO. I said I got the mandate in the wrong place already. I'm not embarrassed by anything. I simply agreed with a statement that we shouldn't rush to judgment. You seem to think that's BS but seem to support the same opinion so it's just ALPA hate ALPA hate. I'm Carl hear me whine about ALPA so people will listen to the rest of the words I have to say...

johnso29 07-11-2013 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1443343)
I take it you (in no particular order):
- Feel Delta has provided us the tools/culture/guidance that enables us to proficiently hand fly with the ATs and FDs off
- Feel the "good faith" sick call provision as currently written (and enforced) is adequate

Absolutely. I disconnect the ATs NLT 1000 ft AGL on every approach that doesn't require them. FD comes off at least once a trip. And I have no fear of calling in sick. Because when I'm sick I have nothing to hide.

Carl Spackler 07-11-2013 04:55 PM


Originally Posted by bigbusdriver (Post 1443376)
Carl, you only have two sides. Carl the bully and Carl the victim...

You are the tantrum king here...

and you went all "whiny ALPA wah wah wah silly pilot wah wah wah...

I'm big mean Carl, let me get my boyfriend Purple to stank on you..."

You can't bully your way through life but I guess at this stage you already have...

Go sh18 on someone else...

Either learn to converse like a man or go back under your cranky bridge...

You needn't bother with a response because we all know you'll just attack the messenger...

Wow. All that hyperbole in one post!

Here was my favorite part though:


Originally Posted by bigbusdriver (Post 1443376)
You can't even have a simple conversation without jumping off the deep end with the hyperbole...

Gotta love it.

Carl

727C47 07-11-2013 05:01 PM

Carl,I am with you on this one,signed anonymous freightdog 400 guy.

bigbusdriver 07-11-2013 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1443397)
Wow. All that hyperbole in one post!

Here was my favorite part though:



Gotta love it.

Carl

Carl the victim!

Carl Spackler 07-11-2013 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by bigbusdriver (Post 1443382)
Already answered that 'Mr Attack the Messenger and I'll say your an ALPA guy because that will destroy your credibility because I'm Carl and I'm mean."

[Insert face palm here]


Originally Posted by bigbusdriver (Post 1443382)
It is an ICAO mandate not mandated by ICAO. I said I got the mandate in the wrong place already. I'm not embarrassed by anything. I simply agreed with a statement that we shouldn't rush to judgment.

That's not simply what you agreed to. Not a single person or entity thus far has advocated rushing to judgment. But I'm glad you agree with that. My disagreement with you is your full throated support of the ALPA press release that bitterly complained about rushing to release the raw data. That's our difference dude. You and ALPA are bitterly whining about something legally performed by the government agency mandated to do so. Not a single legislator, member of the executive branch, or bureaucrat has come out in defense of yours and ALPA's opinion. That's because you're wrong and that press release was an embarrassment to ALPA pilots. The much softer tone of today's ALPA press release tells me somebody told Moak to put a sock in it.


Originally Posted by bigbusdriver (Post 1443382)
You seem to think that's BS but seem to support the same opinion so it's just ALPA hate ALPA hate. I'm Carl hear me whine about ALPA so people will listen to the rest of the words I have to say...

[insert second face palm]

Carl

ShyGuy 07-11-2013 05:11 PM

Can someone provide a simple idiots guide to where DPA stands?

I've heard that their cards already expired and any new drive/vote will require a new set of authorization cards. True?

How many pilots are onboard with DPA, they only need 50% + 1 to pass, correct?

Carl Spackler 07-11-2013 05:31 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1443413)
Can someone provide a simple idiots guide to where DPA stands?

I've heard that their cards already expired and any new drive/vote will require a new set of authorization cards. True?

How many pilots are onboard with DPA, they only need 50% + 1 to pass, correct?

DPA has just under 5,500 properly signed cards from Delta pilots. Of those 5,500 cards, just over 500 have expired because the NMB rules mandate that signed cards are only good for one year. I've had to renew mine three times so far.

You need 50% of the total pilot group to hold a new election for representation rights. To win that election, you must get 50%+1 of all the pilots who decide to vote.

Carl

forgot to bid 07-11-2013 05:31 PM


Originally Posted by bigbusdriver (Post 1443299)
Every time we crash in the sim I always tell the Flight Attendants to remain seated. I hope that doesn't become rote memory :confused: I want to know if the door came off or it the fire department ripped it off or if godzilla was in the bulk.

Imho only, it kind of looks ripped off.

forgot to bid 07-11-2013 05:36 PM

I hadn't really thought about it until PD said it but since the NTSB is not conducting a criminal investigation then is that why the facts can stream out? And imho it isn't accurate to say the pilots are being tried in the court of public opinion.

Now if the pilots intentionally crashed the airplane then it gets kicked over to the FBI and we hear nothing from that point forward. I mean if you look up the 9/11 crashes it basically says SEE FBI...


The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 are under the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Safety Board provided requested technical assistance to the FBI, and this material generated by the NTSB is under the control of the FBI. The Safety Board does not plan to issue a report or open a public docket.
Where is my jailhouse lawyer Newk?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:25 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands