![]() |
|
Snowden on board?
|
Called in sick yesterday. First sick call for the new cycle and 2nd in last 9+ months(called in march or april but prior to that it was late summer early fall of 2012). Have had 3 calls from a 404 # with no msg left. First call was less than 1 hr after calling in. 2nd call an hour later and another about 15 mins ago, again no msg. Has anyone else had this happen and why won't they leave a recorded msg? Already talked to a rep yesterday after first call.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1442928)
Here's the bottom line: It doesn't matter what you or I or ALPA thinks. The chairwoman is the boss. She decides. As I said earlier, the data belongs to the public and the chairwoman has decided that the publics property should be released to them as soon as it's compiled. She'll do the same thing when the board arrives at a probable cause. By complaining so viciously about this, ALPA has isolated itself. Nobody agrees with their position other than some of its own members. The vast majority of citizens agree with her decision to release everything as it's compiled. This was a major misstep by ALPA. They will lose political and public support as a result. The optics are horrible for ALPA. It looks like they're trying to hide something. Completely self-inflicted wound.
As I said earlier, if ALPA opens its mouth like this one more time, I predict the chairwoman will throw ALPA out of any investigative role. Carl You are willing to give up the right to due process for pilots in order to expedite partial data points that have not been verified, nor checked by the other parties (Boeing/P&W) invited to the crash because you say the citizens have a right to the data as soon as it comes out? I assume you have a poll to back up "The vast majority of citizens agree with her decision to release everything as it's compiled." :rolleyes: From today's briefing: "What was the final mode the airplane was in?" Hersman asked. "We still need to validate the data. We need to make sure how the devices were set and what the pilots understood the modes to be." She readily admits the data has not been validated yet. Why even invite Boeing, P&W and others to the investigation if you're just going to Tweet out random data without context and not do the engine breakdown and check the systems. You're way off the mark on this one because you hate ALPA. You don't see that this is setting the stage for the rest of the world to do the same thing? The court of public opinion and the main stream turned tabloid press are costing people jobs. The same NTSB is the one that publicly vilified NWA 188 before the investigation was complete. Babbit was illegally tested by the police, but it didn't stop the press and pilots on here from bashing him. Information should be released but only in context. NTSB @NTSB 7 Jul The throttles were advanced a few seconds prior to impact and the engines appear to respond normally. #Asiana 214 Come on, man! Now there's talk of frickin laser beams... "We really don't know what it could have been," Hersman said. "We need to look into it. We need to understand what he's talking about." We don't know because the investigation is still unfolding. You don't release murder investigation results daily into the press, you release a complete picture when you've finished the investigation. I guess we'll be seeing you on CNN as the TOD aviation expert upon retiring? |
They were flying over the San Francisco bay.
I think we all know where that laser beam came from. http://outsideperception.files.wordp...75trdg_400.jpg http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000..._2_xlarge.jpeg |
Kudos to the CPSC. I had a no-notice family medical issue pop up. Called to see what my options were and they completely rearranged my x-days for the rest of the month so I get the time off I need and don't lose any pay. I couldn't have asked for a better response.
|
Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
(Post 1443202)
Is this Tweet valid data for the vast majority of citizens? NTSB @NTSB 7 Jul The throttles were advanced a few seconds prior to impact and the engines appear to respond normally. #Asiana 214
Is the appearance of an responding normally a factual data point? Come on, man! Sure that directs attention towards the flight deck but so what? On the flip side of the coin should the NTSB have a gag rule imposed such that the engines had not responded properly the NTSB would vow to say nothing pending the completion of a 12+ investigation? What if another 777 crashed in a week in a similar manner? |
Put it this way, we now know a slide deployed inside the cabin. I bet every airline out there with a conscious might take a second look at their safety equipment soon. It's not a bad thing to know.
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1443220)
Well, it's actually good to know in the sense that it's not another loss of power on short final like the BA 777 in LHR.
Imagine if another 777 crashed in 3 weeks on short final and we found out the NTSB knew the previous crash was because of a power loss but decided to say nothing pending the completion of a year long investigation. I'm sure it wouldn't go over well. So I think it's a good idea to put that out. Sure it directs ones attention to the flight deck but I bet every 777 operator, flight crew, Boeing and GE or RR don't mind knowing the airplane was working just fine. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1443228)
Put it this way, we now know a slide deployed inside the cabin. I bet every airline out there with a conscious might take a second look at their safety equipment soon. It's not a bad thing to know.
http://i.nowthisnews.com/prod/4/8/0/..._000000002.jpg |
Wonder if the aircraft was FOQA equipped?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:52 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands