![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1436937)
. Delta has too few of the highest paying seats at the top of the pyramid, that's why LGP would help the many that won't ever be able to hold the top paying equipment, but will have 25-35 years of service, stuck on the 737 (once we park all those old 757's).
|
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1436978)
Their new agreement with AA puts our code share with them in play. They're playing both sides against the middle. They can't have it both ways. If we don't acquire/merge with them, AA/US Air will. Its a matter of time.
|
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 1436987)
This statement proves my point. You want a system where pilots who cannot hold the 777 will get 777 pay. How do you propose to do that? Either the total payroll would have to go up, or some pilots will have to be paid less.
I'm already making 777 pay, I'm already lazy, why would I want it? So I can work more, for the same pay? And no meals? And no naps? Puhleeze. What I said was: no 777 pilots I have flown with in the past 7 years have said they wanted it. It is the -other- pilots, who will never hold the 777, who want it, for obvious reasons. Mo'money. But I'm not getting a raise, so, what-ever.:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1437004)
Where did I say I wanted it?
I'm already making 777 pay, I'm already lazy, why would I want it? So I can work more, for the same pay? And no meals? And no naps? Puhuleeze. |
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1437006)
I would think many would want it because the back of the clock flying is killing them, literally. They would rather stay domestic.
|
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1437006)
I would think many would want it because the back of the clock flying is killing them, literally. They would rather stay domestic.
If you dig deep among 777 guys, the biggest concern is probably the health impact of polar flying...and the ineffective solar radiation mitigation program we are using. If you as a pilot can disconnect mentally from the airplane during your break, and get some sleep, the 777 is overall a good job. To touch on something Timbo said about retiring early, many 777A's drop down to 2 trips a month to ease into retirement. I don't think itis because of health, but more because of the lower impact on their life and the bird in the hand paying the bills. I haven't really heard of many going early. Just many who would like to. |
Well there it is! See, I never connect with the airplane in the first place!
|
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1437030)
Well there it is! See, I never connect with the airplane in the first place!
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 1436977)
-Why buy the cow, when the milk is free?
-Get rid of ability to outsource more mainline flying -Get rid of "threat" of more outsourced flying Don't see it happening My feeling is there TA passes with No scope restrictions! Then Alaska management does what I said they would do some time ago and add a 100 seat RJ outsourced. Then Delta acquires Alaska with this 100 seat capacity purchase agreement in place and says we have to honor this existing agreement. ALPA says we now need to negotiate to keep the damage to a minimum. |
one thing about domestic is you do a lot of swing shifts. and on top of that a lot of legs. a and while big wide heavy international can have you AT work a while or a lot, with domestic you find yourself constantly going to work. plus 5 leg days.
personally its whatever works for your body and personality. believe it or not I like staying up late and would love love love to do nothing but red eyes. I mean when I get up at 330am and drive at 430am to get on a bus at 530am to get to the crewroom at 610am and see those red eye guys going home I'm jealous. I've got a 13 hr day ahead to a 9 hr overnight and yet we both almost got up at the same time. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:45 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands