Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Where did I say IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION should be withheld? You're just being silly. I'd expect an emergency grounding like the 787 if they knew this kind of information. I said the truth should be released, but with contextual information. The BA plane had RR engines and this has P&W. Either way both engine manufacturers had time to look and fix the issues. I'd expect an uproar from the NTSB and FAA if there was an icing rollback issue, but there wasn't. The FDR data is not a substitute for an engine teardown and that's why the engines are flying home to Connecticut to be inspected. The probability is that the FDR data is correct and the engines worked as they were intended but the NTSB said they appeared to do so. The engine manufacturer won't be cleared until the engine is inspected and there may still be an issue. The press isn't doing due diligence and that hurts us as professional aviators. All for truth just not happy about the press focusing in on the soundbites provided directly by the NTSB.
The larger issue is "were the engines working properly?" Answer, seems so.
If the engines hadn't worked but they didn't know why then should they remain quiet for a little while? I don't think so.
After all, what if the RR fix hadn't been the total solution? Again a hypothetical question but how long should they remain quiet in the interest of protecting the pilots?
Last edited by forgot to bid; 07-11-2013 at 01:54 PM.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Understood and agreed. You seem to have a greater than average understanding of the process and information.
Can you advise:
If you review the Board's work on the Gulfstream G650 accident, the Board went beyond the actions of the crew to the complete lack of a safety culture at Gulfstream. The Board was unusually critical of program management at the senior levels of the organization ... the Board, on the basis of objective data went beyond the "what" of the accident to the "why."
This Board, more so than in the past, is a friend of pilots. If the pilots were some how deficient, we should want to understand why, identify the patterns and seek corrective actions applied also.
Many industry insiders have opined the culture at these carriers undermines safety. Cheap, unqualified, pilots are promoted. Those who seek a higher standard are fired. Seems like ALPA would be all for shining a flashlight in this corner.
Can you advise:
- Are the pilots IFALPA, or affiliated some way to our association?
- Is ALPA a party to this investigation?
- What dog do we have in this?
If you review the Board's work on the Gulfstream G650 accident, the Board went beyond the actions of the crew to the complete lack of a safety culture at Gulfstream. The Board was unusually critical of program management at the senior levels of the organization ... the Board, on the basis of objective data went beyond the "what" of the accident to the "why."
This Board, more so than in the past, is a friend of pilots. If the pilots were some how deficient, we should want to understand why, identify the patterns and seek corrective actions applied also.
Many industry insiders have opined the culture at these carriers undermines safety. Cheap, unqualified, pilots are promoted. Those who seek a higher standard are fired. Seems like ALPA would be all for shining a flashlight in this corner.
The press didn't even cover the school in Africa that had a gunman kill 29 children because we were talking about a crash that nearly everyone survived. Where's the outrage for dead children in Africa...? As fascinating as the crash is, we have a job to do and part of that job is not to judge others in a way we wouldn't want to be judged.
How fickle can this forum get? It goes from ALPA should have spoken up to ALPA shouldn't have said a word. There's no winning when every response is the opposite just because. This forum has become so solemn and gloomy that even the other board sucks now because the guys here have gone there to rain on everyone's parade. I've never seen so many people screaming for a response then sh18ing on the response. I am all for safety and factual information in context but (and this is the kicker here) on a webboard full of black helicopter tin foil wearing pessimists, you guys are questioning whether the NTSB may go too far on the future in publicizing your life in the even of an incident to satisfy a honey boo boo audience?
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Exactly what "due process" is the NTSB required to provide?
It's not a criminal investigation/proceeding.
Let's face it: in this day and age the public demands instant gratification. Even so, these pilots are a damn sight better off than if they'd crashed in most other countries.
It's not a criminal investigation/proceeding.
Let's face it: in this day and age the public demands instant gratification. Even so, these pilots are a damn sight better off than if they'd crashed in most other countries.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Pilots were concerned about what would happen with the data and how it would be used. Sounds like a good discussion theme. What data can and should be used and how should it be released knowing it could be you someday.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
I want to know if the door came off or it the fire department ripped it off or if godzilla was in the bulk.
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
We all ought to assume--right or wrong--that every word we say and every action we perform in the cockpit, is going to be subject to intense scrutiny in the case of a mishap. And ALPA is powerless to prevent its release.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Exactly what "due process" is the NTSB required to provide?
It's not a criminal investigation/proceeding.
Let's face it: in this day and age the public demands instant gratification. Even so, these pilots are a damn sight better off than if they'd crashed in most other countries.
It's not a criminal investigation/proceeding.
Let's face it: in this day and age the public demands instant gratification. Even so, these pilots are a damn sight better off than if they'd crashed in most other countries.
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator

I think we're done here.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
No doubt. We are going to be on stage for the world to see warts and all. There's no reason not to be concerned about the lighting?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






