![]() |
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1457540)
Why are these abandoned? Just the battery issues? What doesn't conform?
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1457540)
Why are these abandoned? Just the battery issues? What doesn't conform?
GJ |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1457540)
Why are these abandoned?
Wonder if it wasn't until the fastener issue was discovered that they learned bonded structural members were absent? Or maybe Boeing figures they will eventually engineer mods and finish them. Some of the ANA airplanes in use are flying with structural reinforcements which of course add weight. |
http://www.skymark.co.jp/en/images/route_map.jpg
Things that make you go, hmmmm. Trying to develop it's own FF program, already accepts one airline ... Delta. Needs a hedge against ULC competition. Third largest Japanese carrier and based in Haneda .... Looking for ExPat Captains $163,000 a year with JP taxes and health insurance paid. You know, Delta's got a bunch of First Officers who meet their quals ... we used to crew an operation out of Narita with Asian cabin staff, just sayin.... |
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1457499)
Air Wisconsin. Biggest regional airline of the 1980's. Pioneered the domestic code share arrangement as a UNITED carrier, flying BAE 146's.
|
More water cooler conversation 20-30 A321s 10 A330s 2 777-300s. Old news, I know and we will find out soon for sure.
Does this mean the gum base rumor is coming back to life? |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1457616)
Does this mean the gum base rumor is coming back to life?
|
Sorry, I have no idea on the 787 problems except the battery fire issues. Last I knew the 787 was flying with the "fix" of the battery problem by Boeing. Now there are structural issues? What flight incident was this? The only one I know are the Japan battery fire.
|
Straight from an SC engineer, they are bogged down with teeny-tiny write-ups, which end up being 5g fixes and time killers..most of the help is shade tree.
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 1457648)
Straight from an SC engineer, they are bogged down with teeny-tiny write-ups, which end up being 5g fixes and time killers..most of the help is shade tree.
I wonder if Boeing can recycle the carbon barrels (fuselages) that aren't right? I've never heard that you can recycle carbon fiber anything once it's baked, it's done. Another advantage for aluminum. So...I guess they'd have to 'fix' what ever doesn't fit (adding weight as BB said) or scrap them completely? Wow. :rolleyes: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:31 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands