Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

MrMustache 06-03-2013 08:30 AM


Originally Posted by kiteflyer (Post 1421049)
This just out!

Msp to be all rj by 2018. It's true.

Good job outsourcing your jobs delda.

Where did this come from?

Rogue24 06-03-2013 08:32 AM


Originally Posted by MrMustache (Post 1421037)
Wasn't this similar to the scenario that caused the 2010 hiring? And around the same time?

It was the fact that Delta granted too many long term LOA's and could not force them to return. As a result they needed to hire.

scambo1 06-03-2013 08:35 AM

This looks like the pre-757 drawdown plan put into action to me.

I do find it a little interesting that there are no 73N DTW or 717 DTW vacancies posted. The 73N DTW went with 5 fewer Capts last bid than they said they would have.

So tealeaf- wise, this looks like a drawdown the 757 bid and nothing much else.

tsquare 06-03-2013 08:36 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1421057)
This looks like the pre-757 drawdown plan put into action to me.

I do find it a little interesting that there are no 73N DTW or 717 DTW vacancies posted. The 73N DTW went with 5 fewer Capts last bid than they said they would have.

So tealeaf- wise, this looks like a drawdown the 757 bid and nothing much else.

I don't think so Scambo. Take a look at reserves req/available for all those categories. The FOs have been really fat for a long time.

I flew with one last month that only flies about once every other month.

newKnow 06-03-2013 08:36 AM


Originally Posted by Free Bird (Post 1421032)
I thought the 88B cat was fat?

Once again going forward in reverse.

I thought FTB was still a little delirious from his cold last Friday, so I looked for myself and he was right. 23 green slips went out for ATL MD 88 F/O's on that day alone. If they were fat, they ain't right now. :D

scambo1 06-03-2013 08:41 AM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1421058)
I don't think so Scambo. Take a look at reserves req/available for all those categories. The FOs have been really fat for a long time.

IDK, I was just spitballin. Going with how it looked on the surface.

I guess this is one way to help solve the issue of former domestic only 75 guys - who only want to fly domestic - to fly domestic.

Jack Bauer 06-03-2013 08:46 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1421034)
And 20 of the 100 ER FO displacements are out of NYC. The other 80 are other bases, which is very interesting.

Are we really 100 ER FO's fat, not just right now but for the fallout period during and after the next bid or two?

They could very well be creating a situation where 2014 new hires go heavily to the ER just like in 2007. Maybe that's what they want because of the new 1 year freeze?

If the purpose is to "drive new hires to new hire positions" then this AE, with hiring the better part of at least a year away, doesn't seem to pave the way for that at all. This was clearly 100% about desperately needing bodies in other categories, right now, because they realized they burned themselves by walking over pennies delaying hiring this year and thin bidding existing categories and now they're trying to put out the fire, or at least contain it a little bit.

If this were about setting up some new hire master plan this bid would't have dropped out of the blue, months before an already planned bid, immediately after the last bid, with no notice containing a massive purge from one single fleet type with training/conversions basically effective immediately.

The only other explanation I can see here is the continuation of the great ER purge of 2011-12 continuing. They might have even forced their own hand with no-hiring myopia to save almost nothing in the grand scheme of things and now find themselves in a pickle that could force them to park 75's faster than they otherwise would have had to. That could come in the form of accelerated retirements, or just normal retirements instead of extensions on some of the airframes.

The only scenario I see contrary to the above is a massive all positive AE later this year with no change in 75 retirements (to include some sticking around a little while longer as previously agreed was the consensus), but if that's the case who will fly them after this dump? New hires, of course. Or, even sillier, reinstatement pilots less than a year after getting dumped come back and their positions get filled by new hires. That would be even more of a comedy of errors than the first scenario.

We're either shrinking the ER/75 flying faster (or less slowly) than planned just a month or so ago, or planning is running on fumes, slow and low, trying to work with what they have when they don't have enough to work with. Either way doesn't look good, but it'll look less ungood if there's monster all vacancy AE's right after this one. How likely is that though?

Yeah, I know, the next bid is going to be the one.

Occam's razor or Ockham's razor (kmz)
A rule in science and philosophy stating that the simplest of two or more competing theories is preferable and that an explanation for unknown phenomena should first be attempted in terms of what is already known. Occam's razor is named after the deviser of the rule, English philosopher and theologian William of Ockham (1285?-1349?).

Just the facts maam....

1. The company is in love with "Capacity discipline".
2. 757's are going to retire.
3. The company is running short in NB categories right now due to poor planning or taking a gamble to run short to save money which may be an incorrect assumption...now their failure to plan properly has become your emergency.

Based upon these I think we can deduce where this is going and it has nothing to do with hiring.

iceman49 06-03-2013 08:52 AM

Thanks to everyone on the great info on non-reving off line.

NERD 06-03-2013 09:20 AM

I'm sure I'll be corrected, but is this not the first AE post merger with zero capt or wb fo displacements?(wb=744, 777, 330, 764)

forgot to bid 06-03-2013 09:23 AM


Originally Posted by MrMustache (Post 1421054)
Where did this come from?

The Internet. Probably something even nuttier like the regional thread. :D


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands