Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Carl Spackler 09-05-2013 11:24 AM


Originally Posted by hitimefurl (Post 1477803)
We've never had the vote for LOAs and ALPA has always had a vote for dues and assessments. The DPA has codified an automatic dues increase without a vote for specific events. This can not happen today.

MEMRAT for everything is a different bullet point. It's not a laundry list. My exception was to the Constitution the list was some example for discussion. If you're bored with discussion then I'm sure you don't need to participate.

I guess that's as close as we'll ever get to an admission of being wrong from you. We could go on to bullet point 2 of your laundry list from yesterday, but I don't think you care about correctness. You're just not used to someone pulling apart your factless opinions.

Carl

76drvr 09-05-2013 11:27 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1477807)
Or until a merger integration is complete. Imagine a USAPA situation.

This could take years. :eek:

Then we have to factor in the fact that there is no MCF and no MEC Savings account to enter into negotiations. We'd probably have to pony up assessments on top of the already high DPA dues rate of 2.25%. :mad:

Carl Spackler 09-05-2013 11:27 AM


Originally Posted by 76drvr (Post 1477806)
Automatic dues increases baked into the C&BLs. Wow. A possible 2.25% dues rate without a vote!

And that automatic dues increase stays until we have a contract, that could take years. :eek:

Oh the humanity! Change the contract at will without MEMRAT, but a 0.5% increase in dues for special circumstances without MEMRAT is intolerable!

Carl

johnso29 09-05-2013 11:28 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1477827)
It's fun to see you "ALPA at all costs" guys ignore your own team posts. Hitimefurl made a clear point about what he thought was in the DPA constitution, and he was completely wrong. In my numerous back and forths with him, I made the mistake of saying that April 1, 2015 doesn't trigger anything. That was a mistake because April 1, 2015 could trigger a dues increase if both sides agreed to exchange early openers. But you never fail to disappoint in your complete ignoring of everything else Hitimefurl got wrong.

Carl

I'm not ignoring his mistake. I acknowledged it earlier, when I said several claimed that dues could increase 6 months prior to Sec 6. Per the DPA constitution, they certainly can not.


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1477773)
Ok Carl. Per your request(which I found more then fair) I went back and read a few pages. It seems one of the main points of contention is that DPA dues may not increase prior to 6 months before the amendable date of our PWA. Several claim that dues can increase 6 months prior to Sec 6, which you dispute. You claim that dues can not be increased prior to July 1, 2015, correct?

I agree with you in that regard. But only if it's related to Sec 6. A dues increase prior to April 1, 2015 would be possible if a merger were announced. Which I am fairly certain you also acknowledged.

Thanks for the conversation.

Carl Spackler 09-05-2013 11:29 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1477807)
Or until a merger integration is complete. Imagine a USAPA situation.

Right out of the DALPA talking points. Be sure to equate DPA to USAPA at every opportunity. You're a loyal soldier bud.

Carl

tsquare 09-05-2013 11:32 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1477360)
http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...ps67131f8d.png

so we are growing that much in 4 years?

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enha...63805968-0.jpg

btw the seat count is slightly off because with the 757, 763ER have multiple configurations for the same model and I just used 174 and 208 instead.

There are only 2 seats that matter. I am seriously lost as to why you think a total seat count on the airframes mean anything. WhoGAS?

Splash 09-05-2013 11:32 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1477756)
You have a right to your views.

Thanks. My "views" are that ALPA dues have gone down since you and I have been ALPA pilots. We've both received a refund on our dues this year. Are you telling me your views are different than mine on this?

My "view" is that ALPA dues don't go up automatically during section six as they would under DPA. Is your view the same or different?

My "view" is that you and I have never had a gap in "special circumstances" as defined by the DPA constitution that would have allowed the dues rate to get down to 1% under the DPA formula. Can you enlighten my view by finding a period we've experienced that would have led to us getting to 1%?

If my "views" are off-base, please adjust them with facts I may be missing. If you can't do that, can we change "views" to "reasonable analyses I agree with"? :)


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1477756)
That's not my understanding, but I'm certainly not an expert in the internal budgetary workings of the DALPA funded ALPA treasury. The main take away is that ALPA keeps every penny of dues monies contributed by Delta pilots. Our new union will get none of our money back.

I agree with you! You are certainly not an expert in this area. Here's my evidence:

a. You got a dues refund this year. That makes, "keeps every penny" wrong regardless of "view".

b. If ALPA "keeps every penny", then DPA would too. ALPA uses dues to pay flight pay loss. So would DPA. ALPA uses money to pay for services. So would DPA.


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1477756)
As stated above, ALPA intends to keep all Delta pilots' money. Our new union will have to begin our financials with zero.

So as long as we don't experience any major events until we build up a war chest, we will be ok? Looking back over our careers, can you give me a period of time with no major events that was long enough to build up a comfortable war chest under DPA's constitution?


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1477756)
ALPA uses that as a set of handcuffs to ensure nobody leaves.

Nobody has left ALPA?:confused:


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1477756)
And I wouldn't be counting on Kitty Hawk as "risk management."

Why not?


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1477756)
No, we're all patriots in my view. We just have different views on representation.

Thanks. I'm glad to hear that. That's my view too. I look forward to you helping me with my other "views" by providing some facts.

johnso29 09-05-2013 11:32 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1477839)
Right out of the DALPA talking points. Be sure to equate DPA to USAPA at every opportunity. You're a loyal soldier bud.

Carl

We have to consider all possibilities. USAPA's experience is a possibility. Don't forget about APA. It's a reality, & we have to accept it.

76drvr 09-05-2013 11:33 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1477834)
a 0.5% increase in dues for special circumstances without MEMRAT is intolerable!

Carl

A 29% increase in dues without a vote of any kind baked into the C&BLs is amazing. A dues increase that could be in effect for 7-8 years if our negotiations go anything like the other network independents like USAPA and the APA.

Why hasn't the DPA disclosed this instead of hiding it in the back pages of their C&BLs? Yeah, some transparency. :mad:

135TOAD 09-05-2013 11:42 AM

Where will the 3rd 717 base be located? Any word on 717 delayed deliveries? I just noticed in the monthly update that there will be no published rotations for the 717 in Oct.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands