Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2009 | 10:27 AM
  #13971  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Lead Guitar
Default

Originally Posted by redblueskies
Thank you for that, fellow Delta pilot.

Dude........
Old 09-05-2009 | 10:49 AM
  #13972  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Kargo
Has anyone heard anything about marketing/networking being concerned that they have over estimated the needed block hours for next summer because of the poor summer (and revinue shortfall from it) this year?

Trolling for info...
No, & I highly doubt they are basing next summer off of this past summer. Way to far ahead to make a decision now.
Old 09-05-2009 | 11:38 AM
  #13973  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by redblueskies
Regarding the 401k issue, here is the quick run down. Payrates were slightly skewed pre-JCBA for a reason.

- NWA pilots settled for lower pay rates post bankruptcy to hang on to their pension.

- DAL pilots gave up their pension and received slightly higher pay rates post bankruptcy.

When the two groups came together for the JCBA, as part of the agreement they decided to give fDAL pilot's a higher 401k contribution in lieu of having no pension. That's fine, we can all understand that.
redblue, I was ready to let this go, but after this revisionist history, I can't. Your knowledge of the facts is deeply wanting.

1. DAL pilots received slightly higher pay rates post BK, because that's what WE negotiated. No one gave them to us. You received the payrates you had because that's what YOU negotiated (OK - not you individually, if you were on probation).

2. NO one "decided to give fDAL pilots a higher 401k...." That was negotiated by the pre-merger pilot group long before this merger occurred. Same with your lower DC. Both parties came to the table, brought their respective contracts, and what could be improved for each, was. And what couldn't, wasn't. It's that simple. Each of us are getting identical DC increases beginning on 1/1/10 to the DC previously negotiated by each separate group until 12/31/12, when you get an additional 3%. I'm OK with that, but don't sit here and act like you were thrown under the bus.
Originally Posted by redblueskies
The problem with that however was that about 200 fNWA pilots without pensions were grouped in with the fNWA pilots with pensions.
So, go ask your previous MEC why they gave you that rate, when you didn't have a pension.

Again, redblue, my advice is to let it go. Considering you just recently got hired, you've likely got another 30 years in this career, and you're already working for the largest (and best, imo) airline in the world. The future looks awfully bright for someone in your shoes. Carrying a chip on your shoulder will make this a miserable career. Welcome aboard, and I'll gladly buy the beer when we fly together.
Old 09-05-2009 | 11:59 AM
  #13974  
Hawaii50's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 9
From: 3fidy
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird

Everyone has their issues prioritized. Scope is probably the biggest issue for a large percentage of this pilot group, with pay restoration being right behind it.
If your talking holding the line on more outsourcing I'd agree. If you're talking bringing current DCI flying on property, negotiating flow throughs, etc, I'd say pay restoration is ahead by a long shot, then QOL, then scope. We have Capts now making less than the FOs made pre-BK. Taking a big bite out of that is job #1.
Old 09-05-2009 | 12:41 PM
  #13975  
Fly4hire's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Left, left, left right left....
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
That sounds weird. The Delta offer in February was a relative seniority list, the list we ended up with is basically a relative seniority list. You must be lucky. The final list was certainly much closer to a relative seniority list than it was a date of hire list.

It sounds to you like it was worth the lower contract to go to arbitration. In that case, then there should not be complaints about the differences in DC and longevity. It seems like the guy that is complaining got his arbitration and now wants his money too.
I was comparing lists that were out on the initial offer by DALPA, our counter, and what we ended up with. I'm not complaining - each group did what they thought best represented their pilots. We couldn't meet in the middle, and it was decided for us.

It is what it is. I'm over it and not looking in the rear view - we have far too many future challenges we have to face together. My civil war reference is that it's over and we can't redo it, and despite some unhappiness - more with some than others - we will accomplish far more working together than arguing over what's over and done with
Old 09-05-2009 | 01:42 PM
  #13976  
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: DAL Pilot
Default

Does anybody know where to find the language that talks about pay protection if you get displaced off an aircraft and you can't hold that plane anywhere else in the system? I've looked everywhere but can't find it!
Old 09-05-2009 | 01:53 PM
  #13977  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 53
From: Legacy FO
Default

For you guys who frequent ATL, how do you feel about the new 9L M2 departure setup?

We landed on 9R and after taxing back around, we were #14 holding short of Ramp 1. I know this significantly reduces runway crossings. However, when Ramp 1 gets saturated, nobody can get to a gate.
Old 09-05-2009 | 02:13 PM
  #13978  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks johnso29, you're probably right. I'm just trying to overcome my airline industry produced skepticism about anything positive, i.e. Mamma Delta saying "no Mr. Jr Pilot, we are not going to furlough"...
Old 09-05-2009 | 02:32 PM
  #13979  
buzzpat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
For you guys who frequent ATL, how do you feel about the new 9L M2 departure setup?

We landed on 9R and after taxing back around, we were #14 holding short of Ramp 1. I know this significantly reduces runway crossings. However, when Ramp 1 gets saturated, nobody can get to a gate.
Agreed. I went through there on Thursday. What a cluster.
Old 09-05-2009 | 02:37 PM
  #13980  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 53
From: Legacy FO
Default

Yeah it was a nightmare. On my last rotation, a four day with ins and outs of ATL, we were late for ALL but two flights. Most of it was directly related to the M2 scenario and the ground controllers allowing AirTran to cross 8R at Dixie while holding everyone else up for the B-V loop.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices