|
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1486164)
Not exactly...
You keep making things up if it makes you feel better. You might want to reread the TA presentation and Q&A's to get some facts as to when stuff was going away. And if Delta won't pass up a "great deal for used aircraft" why aren't the plan B airplanes here?:rolleyes: |
B717 news
Flight Ops latest memo says B717 seat fixes are in and deliveries begin in early October. Service entry is planned for Nov 1.
|
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1486098)
+++774777477477
Cheers George TEN |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1486171)
Plan B was never going to happen- at least the way you say now. I read the TA presentations intensely, you know that.
Delta could ignore ownership or other contractual obligations for CRJ-200's.... B717's were coming anyway.... Plan B was never going to happen.... System capacity isn't something management is concerned about.... That's after "intense" study.:D |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1485999)
As on Captain said: "You know what the hardest part about growing old is? You never know what's going to happen when you fart."
and the Captain responds, "Ill take the soup.":D:D TEN |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1486178)
Got it...this is a religious discussion with you about your belief system...;)
Delta could ignore ownership or other contractual obligations for CRJ-200's.... B717's were coming anyway.... Plan B was never going to happen.... System capacity isn't something management is concerned about.... That's after "intense" study.:D It's obvious the 717s were coming... how can you refuse to see that? Notice how the 50s are now being parked far ahead of the company's requirement to park them? |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1486180)
It's obvious the 717s were coming... how can you refuse to see that? Notice how the 50s are now being parked far ahead of the company's requirement to park them?
|
Anyone know what positions were offered to recalls?
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1486178)
Got it...this is a religious discussion with you about your belief system...;)
Delta could ignore ownership or other contractual obligations for CRJ-200's.... B717's were coming anyway.... Plan B was never going to happen.... System capacity isn't something management is concerned about.... That's after "intense" study.:D yeah.. That always cracks me up. I have heard it multiple times how DL could get out of those contracts easily (remember Freedom, that was quick eh?), all the 717's were coming anyway (not that the contract guaranteed even one would come, "only if") but somehow we had leverage upon leverage so that the company would negotiate a TA 6 months early. Dont get me wrong, you can not say what would have happened, we didn't get everything I wanted in the TA, but some of the same folks on here who were clamoring to send it back and said "we will get more" are the same ones now telling me the 50 seater issue wasn't leverage. Just a little paradoxical in my humble opinion. Where was the leverage then 6 months before the amendable date? |
Originally Posted by RonRicco
(Post 1486186)
yeah.. That always cracks me up. I have heard it multiple times how DL could get out of those contracts easily (remember Freedom, that was quick eh?), all the 717's were coming anyway (not that the contract guaranteed even one would come, "only if") but somehow we had leverage upon leverage so that the company would negotiate a TA 6 months early.
Dont get me wrong, you can not say what would have happened, we didn't get everything I wanted in the TA, but some of the same folks on here who were clamoring to send it back and said "we will get more" are the same ones now telling me the 50 seater issue wasn't leverage. Just a little paradoxical in my humble opinion. Where was the leverage then 6 months before the amendable date? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands