![]() |
|
Originally Posted by zoomiezombie
(Post 1489882)
The current language says 5th Freedom between Japan and Asia. The A380 (delivery August 2014) is going to JFK and LHR if they get route authority. That's not 5th freedom FROM Japan TO Asia...?
|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1489581)
If my health insurance sucks, I blame my bargaining agent and my company. From what I see, it sucked long before the current guy took office. Maybe we should start owning some things too, huh? :)
|
Originally Posted by Free Mason
(Post 1489891)
Nope its not. That 380 will compete with us on the JFK route from what I can tell. Doesn't have any bering on this deal one way or another. (Up or down) Their jets that may someday venture outside of Japan are 737's and my Rep noted that 1E 2.A's 40% restriction applies well before the new code share restriction. Its layered from what he told me. I could not get all of the details as he was going to dinner.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1489647)
Not that you could get any worse at people skills, but when you keep parroting that tired old ALPA talking point of calling anyone "emotional" if they disagree with you, it just shows you can't debate.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1489647)
Absolutely we would back DALPA's decision on it because management says they need to do it anyway. Why give them the added gift of keeping code share?
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1489647)
You and I get to think like the "investor class" because we had some good years in which to save money to invest. Lots of younger people here won't have the chance we had if we keep selling their future with scope degradation. Pretty selfish thinking on your part tsquare.
Carl As to "selling" scope. I agree. Let's tell the company to pack sand and see what happens. But since we are on the subject... again... why don't you explain to me what the leverage is besides a clause in the contract that will require the company to pull down that codeshare? Can you guarantee that the company CAN fill those seats, and the resulting lost revenue with DAL airplanes? Is there enough traffic there to do so? MAke the case. I'll listen. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1489675)
Sure would feel nice to say "no", though. Just once.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1489905)
Is that a strategy?
|
Sooo, as an aside...does anyone know the rule on assigning short call? I'm on long call today and tomorrow, and they just called me at 8:30pm base time for a noon short call tomorrow? In almost 6 years of reserve, never had this happen before and thought there was a rule about assigning short calls by 1500 base time. There is plenty of manning tomorrow and the two previously assigned guys for short call tomorrow at 0530 and 1100 haven't been used....any ideas?
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1489815)
Scambo,
Well look at it this way. Narita scope was 316 slots. That's some of our Pacific flying. We now have scope on all of our Pacific flying. Would you rather own half a pie, or, would you rather own 85% of a pie which is twice the size? Council 60 published that Narita was 116,000 block hours. Asia PAC is 214,000. If the choice is THIS or THAT, then I want 85% of the pie that is nearly twice as large and growing. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1489821)
The republicans will never win a national election again because 50% of the country receives a handout.
Eventually, Atlas will shrug and handouts will end because the debt is unsustainable. Completely apolitical and no names called. And when they learn to do math and figure the only to continue the Ponzi scheme is to steal our 401(k)s and change the rules on ROTH IRAs, there will be a giant sucking sound of wealth going offshore. At least you and I agree on SOMETHING. :) |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1489834)
Explain the nature of our leverage. I'm not being a smart-ass. Let's just say we don't work something out. What's the leverage?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:21 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands