![]() |
Originally Posted by sevenfiveseven
(Post 675719)
And the question will be asked "what are we willing to give up contractually to get this flying at mainline............"
That attitude isn't going to work this time around. We've been an ATM for the company through this decade. They are going to have to make a deposit come negotiations... |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 675770)
ooh ooh ooh let me answer this one! :D
It's a rat trap, and not likely to change until the 797 is built and actually flies. |
Originally Posted by RonRicco
(Post 675633)
" I also have heard DIRECTLY from someone who was on the 4th floor at the time that "the company played a shell game with the numbers" to make the case. Whether that is true or not, when asked "if WE could fly them profitably, would you change your vote or vote against the TA" you should have seen the deer in the headlight look.
Somebody blew you a line of smoke. There was nobody from the 4th floor around when the deal was finally done. Retired Captain Dean Bloom was the initial Flight Ops rep for the negotiations, but he was removed and not replaced during the 3-man panel process. The deal that included scope changes came about the last week of negotiations in New York. Kolshak and Pheasant flew up for that last week, and after 2 days of Kolshak's obstructionism were removed from the process by Grinstein. When the deal was done the only management participants were Finance and 2 lawyers. The 76 seat change was the last item finalized, and for the reasons that Sailingfun alluded to and I've described before the line got moved. As I've also said, the process was heavily weighted toward the debtor in bankruptcy, but ALPA introduced enough doubt that management thought LOA 51 was the more constructive long term path. They actually wanted to run an airline post bankruptcy. |
"There was nobody from the 4th floor around when the deal was finally done."
He was not in a pilot 4th floor position and he wasn't directly in the talks. Just one of those guys who works up the numbers, to present to the guys who negotiated against us. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 675775)
That attitude isn't going to work this time around. We've been an ATM for the company through this decade. They are going to have to make a deposit come negotiations...
The first part of your post isn't exactly true. From 2001-2004 Delta pilots received substantial payraises. 11/11/04 saw LOA 46 and the first real concessions (save PRP's). LOA 50 occured in bankruptcy and was the final pay reduction (12/14/05). Since then there has been slow but steady progress made on restoration. Also, anyone that took those large concessions divvied up $2 billion in Claim and Notes, and the pilot group got 49 million shares of Delta for the merger, plus about 18% in compensation restoration over the 4 years of the deal. And as far as the ATM comment, the folks really taken to the cleaners were the shareowners and unsecured debt holders. I agree that there will be substantial improvements in our contract over time. I'd prefer not to wait until 2012, but take every opportunity to add value prior to that point. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 675812)
For some reason I thought you came from PCL and hired on here in 2007. Am I mistaken?
The first part of your post isn't exactly true. From 2001-2004 Delta pilots received substantial payraises. 11/11/04 saw LOA 46 and the first real concessions (save PRP's). LOA 50 occured in bankruptcy and was the final pay reduction (12/14/05). Since then there has been slow but steady progress made on restoration. Also, anyone that took those large concessions divvied up $2 billion in Claim and Notes, and the pilot group got 49 million shares of Delta for the merger, plus about 18% in compensation restoration over the 4 years of the deal. And as far as the ATM comment, the folks really taken to the cleaners were the shareowners and unsecured debt holders. I agree that there will be substantial improvements in our contract over time. I'd prefer not to wait until 2012, but take every opportunity to add value prior to that point. If any RJ flying is to be done at mainline, which I pray it will be, it shouldn't come at the expense of what little we have left. J shareowner and unsecured debt holder |
Originally Posted by firstmob
(Post 675750)
ACL What's the deal with the JFK terminal situation?
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 675775)
That attitude isn't going to work this time around. We've been an ATM for the company through this decade. They are going to have to make a deposit come negotiations...
|
Originally Posted by dragon
(Post 675833)
What they put out at the road show today was they would demo term 3, and build a connector from 2 to 4 which would also include Customs and immigration. Its a multi year plan and could all be scrapped if we can convince AA to let us take their terminal.
Fact is AMR is not moving too much, and they are really close to securing the bonds for the JFK deal. |
[quote=slowplay;675812]For some reason I thought you came from PCL and hired on here in 2007. Am I mistaken?
The first part of your post isn't exactly true. From 2001-2004 Delta pilots received substantial payraises. Except for the 1000+ guys that took a 100% paycut. I can understand that furloughs were unavoidable at that time but what I never understood was the greenslip situation during this time. If memory serves, we tried a no greenslip policy and got slammed because it was a change to the "status-quo." Well when greenslips were reduced to 150% pay, only over the trigger - there was no status-quo. Ancient history - but why did we not try a no greenslip policy at that time? :confused: Scoop |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands