Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Timbo 02-17-2014 03:34 AM

It's bad enough that I can't go down an escalator, but now I can't even take a leak! Guess I'll have to start wearing those Depends my kids gave me for my last birthday, or carrying an empty milk jug:

Co-pilot hijacks Ethiopian plane, surrenders to Swiss police | Reuters

So Scambo, where we going?

If you're going to 'divert' while I'm in the Lav, please, take us to St. Maarten!

Just like I told those idiots at the TSA, "Leave my nail clippers alone! We don't need nail clippers to hijack an airplane."

"The plane's second-in-command, who was not carrying a weapon, took control of the plane when the pilot left the cockpit to use the toilet."

n9810f 02-17-2014 03:50 AM


Originally Posted by JungleBus (Post 1581744)
Or Frontier doing LAX-MSP, which NW responded to by smothering that route with DC10s and sucking up all F9s pax with ridiculously low fares (I recall $49, this was in 2002-03 or so). They did the same to airtran when they tried some direct flying out of MSP. But Reno, airtran & Frontier went up against Northwest. NWA was always the most aggressive in defending their hubs, to the point of being accused of anti-competitive behavior, and was especially protective of MSP. They tolerated Sun Country as a way of keeping all the other LCCs out. Delta's always been a lot more laissez-faire about competition even in their core hubs, and MSP certainly isn't one of those anymore.

Yes Northwest was nuclear about competition!

NW added DEN-LAX in addition to carpet bombing LAX-MSP against Frontier.

DALMD88FO 02-17-2014 04:02 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1583198)
LOL. Did my best. Sorry if you're spinning!

The profit sharing change was for a fixed dollar amount which equaled roughly $42 million dollars. That is approximately 2.08% in pay rates on the 2012 charts.

Now here's the nice part. $42m in PS stays $42 million no matter how high our compensation goes. If you were smart you'd have wanted ALL of the 0-25B profit sharing in hard pay. (but I think the Company didn't want to disincentivize the other employee groups, they're non-union and wouldn't do the advanced math to know it was a good thing.)

That 2.08% that was put into pay rates is now compounded in everything in the contract.

WITHOUT including the compounding from increased DC, vacation, training, reserve, M88/90 pay, ADG, etc.

In 2013, that PS is now worth 2.14% or $43.2 million
In 2014, that PS is now worth 2.21% or $44.6 million

and it continues to compound into the future.

I'd trade the other 10% of 0-2.5B for 4.5% on our pay tables as fast as they'd offer.
The "above $2.5B 20%" is the part I wouldn't let the Company touch. That is where the upside is unlimited.

This is the train of thought that I do not understand. Profit sharing was negotiated during LOA 51 when the company was gutting our contract during the dark days. We negotiated it just for the days we are going through now, meaning making money hand over fist. It's been paid for once now we paid for it again in C2012.

We have once again fixed a company problem. The pilot group gave up a much larger percentage of pay and retirement than any other group at Delta. We negotiated profit sharing then the company decided to GIVE it the other employee groups. We knew that was going to happen, that's a history lesson to fortune telling. Not a big deal to the company either since they weren't making money so there wasn't a check.

Now fast forward to today and the check is getting quite large and the company wants to take some of that money back. If they go and take it from the non-union employees (which they can do at any time), then they have to worry about them running out and unionizing. So they come to us and say if you give some of it back then you can have larger pay raises.

I voted no to C2012. I felt that over a decade of giving back to the company that we had done our share and expected a contract that recognized those sacrifices. The union kept saying that if we didn't give the profit sharing back the 4-8-3-3 would have been even smaller raises. I don't think that even Delta pilots with our history of passing everything 60/40 would have passed that.

On a positive note, I just watched Lee Moaks video about the pilot shortage. I actually feel he did a good job putting airline management on the spot about pay and benefits being the reason we are not attracting pilots in the US nowadays.

Bucking Bar 02-17-2014 04:15 AM

Pr

Originally Posted by Jay5150 (Post 1583350)
For one, Lawson is villified because it was his letter that said that the union at ComAir supported not hiring DAL furloughees unless they resigned their seniority number.

You seem to be defending him, and you are picking the wrong crowd to do that with.

Jay,

I may be the only active participant on this board who actually took the time to talk to J C Lawson about the error that he made. I told him he should be building bridges as we tried to do at ASA, not throwing political grenades.

Delta pilots are an intelligent group of people. I only write these things to help them see the matter objectively, so that they may properly consider their political support and hold their elected representatives accountable when questions involving their employment proective provisions are decided.

dalad 02-17-2014 04:27 AM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1583355)
It's bad enough that I can't go down an escalator, but now I can't even take a leak! Guess I'll have to start wearing those Depends my kids gave me for my last birthday, or carrying an empty milk jug:

Co-pilot hijacks Ethiopian plane, surrenders to Swiss police | Reuters

So Scambo, where we going?

If you're going to 'divert' while I'm in the Lav, please, take us to St. Maarten!

Just like I told those idiots at the TSA, "Leave my nail clippers alone! We don't need nail clippers to hijack an airplane."

"The plane's second-in-command, who was not carrying a weapon, took control of the plane when the pilot left the cockpit to use the toilet."

I read this earlier, and all I could think is, why didn't he just take the train to Geneva?

Jay5150 02-17-2014 04:47 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1583363)
Pr

Jay,

I may be the only active participant on this board who actually took the time to talk to J C Lawson about the error that he made. I told him he should be building bridges as we tried to do at ASA, not throwing political grenades.

Delta pilots are an intelligent group of people. I only write these things to help them see the matter objectively, so that they may properly consider their political support and hold their elected representatives accountable when questions involving their employment proective provisions are decided.

I get what you are saying and many may find your insight in the matter helpful. Trust me, the 1300+ furloughed are well aware of who is accountable for employment protection provisions as we watched what we had get negotiated away while we were still out.

Lawson tried to use a bunch of guys who had just taken a 100% pay and benefits cut (well not quite 100% as DALPA paid our COBRA which was a huge help), but tried to use us as leverage to get himself a windfall. He doesn't get a pass on that. Ever.

georgetg 02-17-2014 05:08 AM

ORD LHR coming in OCT, 7ER
#airlineroute

Cheers
George

forgot to bid 02-17-2014 05:18 AM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1583355)
It's bad enough that I can't go down an escalator, but now I can't even take a leak! Guess I'll have to start wearing those Depends my kids gave me for my last birthday, or carrying an empty milk jug:

Co-pilot hijacks Ethiopian plane, surrenders to Swiss police | Reuters

So Scambo, where we going?

If you're going to 'divert' while I'm in the Lav, please, take us to St. Maarten!

Just like I told those idiots at the TSA, "Leave my nail clippers alone! We don't need nail clippers to hijack an airplane."

"The plane's second-in-command, who was not carrying a weapon, took control of the plane when the pilot left the cockpit to use the toilet."

Don't let your friends hijack airplanes. Because St Maarten ain't all that, St Baarts is where you'll want to go, you'll go broke on $12 beer, it ain't worth it.

I've got a better idea for you. Have you had your coffee yet this morning Mr Florida lake fisherman man? No? Cool, you won't need it...

Just click on it...
Megyn Kelly to Janice Dean: If they're canceling the train, are we having another night in bed? - YouTube

:D

slowplay 02-17-2014 05:44 AM


Originally Posted by Jay5150 (Post 1583389)
I get what you are saying and many may find your insight in the matter helpful. Trust me, the 1300+ furloughed are well aware of who is accountable for employment protection provisions as we watched what we had get negotiated away while we were still out.

Lawson tried to use a bunch of guys who had just taken a 100% pay and benefits cut (well not quite 100% as DALPA paid our COBRA which was a huge help), but tried to use us as leverage to get himself a windfall. He doesn't get a pass on that. Ever.

I'm sure someone can repost the letter (which desired a trade for larger jets in addition to holding hostages), but it wasn't the only thing that caused a "strain" in relations. Lawson and Bob Arnold (RIP) were the only two DCI labor leaders that refused to sign a Mutual Support agreement leading up to C2K with the Delta pilots. Even SkyWest's student council signed.

Bar's simplistic recollections of the PID pushed for by ASA/CMR and his dismissal of the risks for then current Delta pilots overlook among others the Roberts award, the internal results of DAL's own WAL and PAA integrations, the later Nicolau award and the consequences they induced. While "zippers" may have been planned in private, the public face presented to the Delta MEC was PID. Oh, and it doesn't even take into account the elephant in the room -that management would have had to agree to a merger...which they wouldn't/didn't.

Bar's frame of reference appears to be that scope was "ironclad" until 1996. Not true. Deregulation moved faster than labor contracts. We are where we are, and wishing for "unity" doesn't get us where Bar desires us to be. You've got to get your counterparty to agree, and that's where it becomes a math problem for management and pilot labor.

Purple Drank 02-17-2014 06:49 AM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 1583416)
You've got to get your counterparty to agree, and that's where it becomes a math problem for management and pilot labor.

True. DALPA has proven highly adept at getting management's numbers to work.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands