Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

forgot to bid 02-26-2014 06:30 AM


Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 1589957)
I don't advertise my books or offer lap dances.

Although the thought has crossed my mind.;)

Your book is about... and lap dances... hey Buzz, are you sending us a hint?

http://topnews.in/files/images/Elizabeth-Hurley1_4.jpg

was she pretty? :D

Hawaii50 02-26-2014 06:49 AM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 1590117)
So, you have never done one flow, or checklist or flight using SOPA/SMAC, yet "That is the kind of rigidity that is not needed. It is ridiculous and parochial."

That, Bub, is ignorant.

I've done it both ways at both companies and T's right IMO.

Scoop 02-26-2014 07:00 AM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 1590039)
It was a point of emphasis at my previous carrier as well. This has nothing to do with SOPA/MAC (whatever the hell that is.) It has to do with the interpretation of a rather "gray" FAR.



SOPA - Senior Officer Present Afloat. The most Senior US Naval Officer on a ship or a group of ships. :D

Actually I think it means Standard Operating Procedures Amplified or something similar.

Scoop

LeineLodge 02-26-2014 07:02 AM


Originally Posted by DogWhisperer (Post 1590160)
Boy…did I have a weird dream last night...

http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/y...ps23013422.jpg

B-780? or A-387? Now they will be able to DH us on the middle deck in addition to the middle seat!

Of note, the tailnumber N3971 is registered to a Twin Beech in Nevada. Does this lend credence to the little-known merger rumor with Allegiant? Anything to get our hands on a few more DC-9 derivatives I guess.

Looks like it has an E-175's APU exhaust mated with a 330...

LeineLodge 02-26-2014 07:09 AM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1590216)
SOPA - Senior Officer Present Afloat. The most Senior US Naval Officer on a ship or a group of ships. :D

Actually I think it means Standard Operating Procedures Amplified or something similar.

Scoop

Which is very similar to what's in our Vol 1 now - Amplified Procedures.

I've never seen what the big deal is. SOPA/SMAC was a comfortable way to fly, as you always knew EXACTLY what the other guy was going to do. That said, I never felt operationally restricted.

The one major downside of SOPA/SMAC, IMO, was in the preflight. We had a CA and an FO preflight (instead of PF/PM) and after a few months on the line I quickly started forgetting what all those "CA Switches" did. There was roughly half of the overhead panel that I NEVER touched, making it more difficult to keep your mind wrapped around the other guy's switches. But I knew 100% (of 50%) of the Airbus! :D

Our current way is my new favorite way, and I'm sure the next "best way" will be fine too. A little common sense goes a looooong way.

Rudder 02-26-2014 09:38 AM

Anything come out of the ATL lounge visit?

gloopy 02-26-2014 09:41 AM


Originally Posted by GunshipGuy (Post 1589745)
One of the guys on the 88 who did this retired in Oct. I can't recall what he flew....maybe the same guy. The one who made it even worse IMO would include the fact that he graduated from MIT right before talking about his carrier landings. The give away that this is about to happen: When he asks what you did before coming to Delta within 30 seconds of meeting one another in the cockpit.

Went to The Academy. What Springs? No, The Academy in Sanford, FL. You know, the Comair Academy, but don't worry its just a friendly rivalry with our peers from Embry Riddle; we all pretty much get hired wherever we want these days. Anyway I paid extra for the fast track program so I didn't have to instruct. Had to do 2 years in the right seat of an RJ before the guaranteed flow kicked in cause we weren't hiring. Pretty much screwed me out of 2 years seniority, you know? Then I had to do 6 months on reserve, it was brutal I was getting lots of 5 day trips I felt like I was being deployed, you know? Its not too bad though if you commute by choice and just sick out if your one flight is going to be late or whatever. So what fraternity did you say you were in?

gloopy 02-26-2014 09:44 AM


Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 1589766)
GMAB. Does the FAA ever jump seat on SWA? I welcome the folks, tell them where we are in the conga line, and not worry about it. If the FAA deems that a violation, so be it. I haven't had a problem in 14 years.

Yeah really. I can't believe anyone actually thinks saying what number you are for takeoff is a violation. Its 100% CRM and vital information for the FA's. Its probably the same people that climb at 240 because they think if they climb at 250 and hit a one knot gust they're violating the regs. :rolleyes:

APCLurker 02-26-2014 09:58 AM


Originally Posted by LeineLodge (Post 1590226)
I've never seen what the big deal is.

Me neither. Which is why I posted what I did. I swear I could almost "see" the look of terror on posters faces regarding sopa/smac through my monitor. :eek: It was a bit amusing.

This is a big to-do about nothing. Which is interesting considering how often some here say the same thing about other issues that people bring up.



That said, I never felt operationally restricted.
Me neither.



Our current way is my new favorite way, and I'm sure the next "best way" will be fine too. A little common sense goes a looooong way.
Once again, spot on.

And Big box theory, little box theory, sopa/smac, No sopa/smac, I'll do it the way the company wants. None of it is the end of the world.


And it would not suprise me in the least if what other's have said regarding it being on the way comes true. The latest Vol 1 revision on my airplane is pretty much spot on to old nw. Verbatim at times. And to head off the inevitable tangent: no I am not saying it was better that way.

APCLurker 02-26-2014 10:06 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1590374)
Yeah really. I can't believe anyone actually thinks saying what number you are for takeoff is a violation. Its 100% CRM and vital information for the FA's. Its probably the same people that climb at 240 because they think if they climb at 250 and hit a one knot gust they're violating the regs. :rolleyes:


Who here has said they think saying what number you are for takeoff is a violation? To the contrary, I have seen a number of posters state they excluded that type of statement, and that they are referring to the long drawn out types.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands