![]() |
|
Originally Posted by DogWhisperer
(Post 1589924)
Just a little something to dream about, tonight…
http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/y...psde33406c.jpg Wow, those new 737-900ER's sure look nice! ;) |
Originally Posted by DogWhisperer
(Post 1589924)
Just a little something to dream about, tonight…
http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/y...psde33406c.jpg |
I like what the UAL guys are calling them:
"Ole' Sparky" Or how about; "The Plastic Fantastic" |
Originally Posted by DogWhisperer
(Post 1589924)
Just a little something to dream about, tonight…
http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/y...psde33406c.jpg |
Originally Posted by MrBojangles
(Post 1589927)
pretty sure saying what number you are for takeoff is OK, but i'm talking about the guys that ramble on for a minute or so, talk about the wx at destination and what not.
Although the thought has crossed my mind.;) |
Originally Posted by DogWhisperer
(Post 1589924)
Just a little something to dream about, tonight…
http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/y...psde33406c.jpg |
Originally Posted by ATL7ER
(Post 1589878)
It's already here and has been for a long time.
SOPA = Vol 1 Section 20 Amplified Procedures. SMAC = Flight Crew Training Manual. That's all SOPA/SMAC ever was at NWA. The idea of the rigidity of NWA procedures has created this urban legend in the eyes of South pilots as to what SOPA/SMAC was. I still have a copy of my fleet SOPA/SMAC from NWA. It is virtually identical to my DAL Vol 1 Section 20 and my FCTM, right down to the graphics. Vol 1 has tables that specify CA/FO and PF/PM actions, callouts, responses, etc. THAT is precisely what SOPA was at NWA. FCTM has amplified discussions of maneuvers including full page graphics of various procedures such as takeoff profiles, engine out profiles, etc. THAT is precisely what SMAC was at NWA.:eek: It is perfectly acceptable and sanctioned to give a brief welcome along with the "flight attendants please be seated for departure," for example.. and the FAA has no legs to give you any grief over it. Don't go overboard, though.. but it was left gray for a reason. Most of the CAs I fly with on fifi are great about giving a welcome aboard PA, and there's no entertainment system to interrupt en route (my sexy voice that they so want to hear more of is the entertainment), so it is extremely rare for me to say more than the number and the scripted PA... however on the 757/767, guys didn't do it as much. So I'd tack on time en route to the PA. Nothing excessive, nor nothing that you could get in trouble for either. |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1589943)
I like what the UAL guys are calling them:
"Ole' Sparky" Or how about; "The Plastic Fantastic" |
Boeing looks to sell off 787 ‘terrible teens’ | Business & Technology | The Seattle Times
One more decent news story on the "terrible teens." Name like that brings back memories of the "twisted sisters." |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1589915)
So, communicating with the FAs (and by extension, the pax) where we are in the departure process after the longest safety video in safety video history is violating sterile cockpit? I'll take my chances. Especially when I watch all the AA guys having to pull over waiting for their numbers. We're trying to be safe AND on time, right? Sheesh.
I could ultimately care less what somebody else decides to do on their takeoff pa. Their decision, not mine. Some on here were talking about "black helicopters" in regards to the faa going after somebody about it, like there is no way it could ever happen. I was providing info that it has happened. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands