![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1631222)
C2012 scope which returns flying to mainline notwithstanding?
Who knows if the 717's would have shown up (I think they would). But, Delta saved a lot of money with the RJ swap and has yet to actually order about half of what they were allowed. Again, I understand the desire to counteract those who would argue that C2012 was a major give in QOL and career progression, but I'm not sure that this is the way to do it. |
De-le-ted.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1631184)
4% pay increase per month starting now for 6 months.
|
Originally Posted by Imapilot2
(Post 1631188)
Just so we are on the same page I do not want an ADG. I want a minimum guarantee look forward so as not to ever be averaged.
The VM had to average 5 hours a day (ranging from 4-6). We exchanged it for the Duty Period Average that we have today of 5.15. There were times when the VM was superior to the DPA, and times when the DPA was better. In the very very big aggregate picture I think the DPA comes out ahead. But if we went to a hard min day guarantee, the company is not going to create the trips we are flying today identically, and just miraculously give us more hours of credit for the same flying. The trip mix will change. For some it may be much better, and for others worse. But if you are the kind of guy that likes to fly one leg LGA-MSP on day 3 and then you are done...that kind of trip, which is not unheard of under the DPA system, WILL be unheard of in a hard min day system. |
Originally Posted by Herkflyr
(Post 1631236)
While we would all be ecstatic with that, mgmt would agree to that....why?
|
Originally Posted by Herkflyr
(Post 1631240)
Be careful what you ask for.
...if we went to a hard min day guarantee, the company is not going to create the trips we are flying today identically, and just miraculously give us more hours of credit for the same flying. The trip mix will change. For some it may be much better, and for others worse. But if you are the kind of guy that likes to fly one leg LGA-MSP on day 3 and then you are done...that kind of trip, which is not unheard of under the DPA system, WILL be unheard of in a hard min day system. |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1631227)
Agreed. That said, the latest AE shows wide-body Captain vacancies. To the extent that those awarded positions show up on this banner, there will certain be new Captains awards being counted that are due to attrition.
Again, I understand the desire to counteract those who would argue that C2012 was a major give in QOL and career progression, but I'm not sure that this is the way to do it. The bottom line for us? Mediocrity in a time of record profits. Profits which shatter all expectations of what an airline transport corporation can achieve. And we reap nothing close to what our predecessors did during lesser times, despite the fact so much of it was achieved on our backs, as Timbo has pointed out. This is why 2012 was half baked. As the economy picks up steam, where will our profession lay on the compensation scale via a vis the more traditional ones? Just rhetorical questions... but have you seen what our VP's are making? |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1631241)
Because they love us? After all, we've had our backpacks on for quite a while now. ;)
Did the company just put out a 'not tonight pillow'? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UiQBMepXdH...00/tonight.jpg :D |
Perspective. Seeing a child on a "make a wish trip" the same age as your own.
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1631226)
allow seniority advancement to pacify the group,
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands