![]() |
|
?????
Incident: Delta B738 at Las Vegas on May 2nd 2014, rejected takeoff
By Simon Hradecky, created Saturday, May 3rd 2014 21:59Z, last updated Saturday, May 3rd 2014 21:59Z A Delta Airlines Boeing 737-800, flight DL-2483 from Las Vegas,NV to Atlanta,GA (USA) with 160 passengers and 6 crew, had been cleared for immediate takeoff from Las Vegas' runway 25R at 14:32L (21:32Z). The aircraft was accelerating for takeoff when tower cancelled the takeoff clearance about 40 seconds after the clearance for takeoff. The aircraft rejected takeoff at high speed, slowed safely and vacated the runway via taxiway A5 about 7500 feet/2250 meters down the runway. The aircraft returned to the apron. A replacement Boeing 737-800 registration N3757D reached Atlanta with a delay of 6:40 hours. The FAA reported a private aircraft was on approach to a crossing runway prompting the air traffic controller to cancel the takeoff clearance as a precaution. Preliminary review of the radar data showed however that there was no conflict even if the takeoff had continued. I landed right after this apparently happened, the FO and I looked at each other when they were stopped on the taxiway for suspected hot brakes. We both said ****? The tower told them to abort? This is going to be interesting-maybe a CQ SPOT. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1636285)
I always wanted a sit and spin...I was just too old when they were invented. Now I just want no spin...
Redneck chair spinner thrill ride | Best Funny Gifs and Animated Gifs Updated Daily - Gif Bin |
Hearing of talk at the board level about Hawaiian. Still think this makes the most sense... not only for Hnd, but more so for hub to asia/australia. Small enough to get by DOJ, but I bet state of Hawaii would fight it tooth & nail.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1636187)
I don't keep up with the RJ stuff like I used to, but at one time Delta had the largest CF34 overhaul facility on the planet.
There is a 50 seat market. Some (probably about 120 or so) will stick around long term. The rub is that the 76 seater brings in > 50% more revenue at similar ~ 10 to 15% higher block hour and trip cost. Bombardier and Embraer are good at keeping Delta's secrets. That' part of the deal. I am suprised Delta has not executed the order allowed under C2012 scope, after all gettng the large RJ's as swaps was a major part of that deal ... then, nothing. I agree that there is a market to some limited extent for some airframes that size (heck, there's a market for big Globals/Gulfstreams…so much so we for some reason agreed to forgive a scope violation and allow non union pilots who were already violating our contract to own that flying), and its possible that a small number of the 50 fleet will at some point get new engines and maybe, just maybe a heavy check or whatever it was here or there. But the threat to just go "all-in" with that many 50 seaters was an empty one. They were never going to do that, and they knew it then as well as they know it now. |
Gloopy, although the C-Series does seem to go against the normal RA checklist items for airplane purchase (ie new, untested airframe), why do you think he mentioned they could be in our future? I was surprised to hear it myself. Just more posturing to get a better deal from Boeing/Airbus?
|
Originally Posted by EdGrimley
(Post 1636330)
Gloopy, although the C-Series does seem to go against the normal RA checklist items for airplane purchase (ie new, untested airframe), why do you think he mentioned they could be in our future? I was surprised to hear it myself. Just more posturing to get a better deal from Boeing/Airbus?
I guess "everything has a price" or whatever, so if they came to us with some sort of offer we couldn't refuse like say an unbelieveable price, extended warranty, guaranteed dispatch reliability with a DL friendly exit clause/compensation if it dissapointed, gold plated Cadillac AD insurance and no charge for the APU hours or something, I'm sure we'd do it. I doubt any (re)fleeting need actively excludes something just to be stubborn. I just don't think the C is going to be remotely competitive. Their CEO has basically said many times he ain't coming off the price and he thinks he's sitting on a real gem…apparently no one else in the industry seems to agree. Its possible I guess, but they are going to have to come hard to the paint. Right now they're standing behind the half court line under double coverage with half a second on the shot clock. |
I give up, how does one load an animated gif?
|
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1636316)
Hearing of talk at the board level about Hawaiian. Still think this makes the most sense... not only for Hnd, but more so for hub to asia/australia. Small enough to get by DOJ, but I bet state of Hawaii would fight it tooth & nail.
|
Originally Posted by cni187
(Post 1636364)
Dude just give it up, it will not happen!!
The A/E closes tomorrow, hurry, this opportunity won't last long! :D |
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands