Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2014 | 05:31 AM
  #150491  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Uh yeah, so what was UGBSM talking about again???

Bring 'em on over. If he doesn't want to fly it, I will.
Absolutely. The classic 737 flying was renown as some of the best in the system, until the RJs came and we parked them and furloughed pilots, simultaneously destroying a great product and alienating our customer base and laying off station employees with 30 years of dedicated service... what's the time to upgrade in SLC now? A quarter century to be the plug on a narrowbody? THIS was far more devastating to our careers than losing the pension.
Old 03-03-2014 | 05:40 AM
  #150492  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus

(7:36 credit day trip)

(13:13 Credit for 2 days)

10-leg, 26:50 four-day trip.
Slowplay likes to go on about how Delta could not afford to pay RJ drivers "Delta" pay. Actually, perhaps the inverse is true. Among the trips we can hold.

2 days are nearly always 10:30
3 days, 13:30
4 days, 21:00 (I've got an 18 hour 4 day next week )

Here's the typical

07 673 ATL 1735 UIO 2258 5.23 700

08 1560 UIO 2340 ATL 0557 5.17
5.17B
5.17TL
2.50ADG

REGULAR- 13.30TL 10.40BL 2.50CR
Old 03-03-2014 | 05:49 AM
  #150493  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Slowplay likes to go on about how Delta could not afford to pay RJ drivers "Delta" pay. Actually, perhaps the inverse is true. Among the trips we can hold.

2 days are nearly always 10:30
3 days, 13:30
4 days, 21:00 (I've got an 18 hour 4 day next week )

Here's the typical

07 673 ATL 1735 UIO 2258 5.23 700

08 1560 UIO 2340 ATL 0557 5.17
5.17B
5.17TL
2.50ADG

REGULAR- 13.30TL 10.40BL 2.50CR

I'm not saying 13.30 is good enough for a 3 day, but when I did UIO (as I know you did too) it was only slightly more than 10:30 due to the segment times. That was totally unacceptable and a large reason that UIO, and a lot of the west coast 3 day "turns" are/were always in open time.

ADG has helped immensely, making those trips pay 20-30% more. Now that we started down that road, ADG needs to be brought up to 5:30 or 6, get rid of Duty Period Avg altogether. That would go a long way towards more $/days worked as well as requiring more pilots IMO...
Old 03-03-2014 | 05:51 AM
  #150494  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Slowplay likes to go on about how Delta could not afford to pay RJ drivers "Delta" pay. Actually, perhaps the inverse is true. Among the trips we can hold.

2 days are nearly always 10:30
3 days, 13:30
4 days, 21:00 (I've got an 18 hour 4 day next week )

Here's the typical

07 673 ATL 1735 UIO 2258 5.23 700

08 1560 UIO 2340 ATL 0557 5.17
5.17B
5.17TL
2.50ADG

REGULAR- 13.30TL 10.40BL 2.50CR
Your premise is and always has been correct. The real reason for doing business this way started with malfeasance ( RJ self financing BS), then continued as a way to consistently B!tch$lap airline pilots and drive the overall profession down to a vocation. THAT is why it continues and that is what must be overcome, with, as you surmise, help from economic realities.
Old 03-03-2014 | 05:51 AM
  #150495  
Hornet1's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
Eight short calls would not be contractually correct. Have you called Crew Scheduling to ask them about this?
Yes, eight short calls goes against the PWA and why I find it interesting that it shows in icrew as that. I figured that the company would ask for more short calls during negotiations for 117 but I have heard of no LOA's being signed. I was wondering if it might have been put in the DBMS programming by the company expecting that negotiations we be completed soon and this is one of the things we gave them.

I did call scheduling and she said it was a mistake, I'm still skeptical.
Old 03-03-2014 | 05:55 AM
  #150496  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
Absolutely. The classic 737 flying was renown as some of the best in the system, until the RJs came and we parked them and furloughed pilots, simultaneously destroying a great product and alienating our customer base and laying off station employees with 30 years of dedicated service... what's the time to upgrade in SLC now? A quarter century to be the plug on a narrowbody? THIS was far more devastating to our careers than losing the pension.
My pension was valued at over $1 million. I have to disagree with that. We do need to have all DAL flying done by DAL pilots period, but the loss of the DB plan was significant for the top third of the list. Those that are coming on board now are going to do very well with the DC plan we have in place, especially if the numbers % wise increase.
Old 03-03-2014 | 05:59 AM
  #150497  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

so Junglebus 4 day is 26+, 10 legs, 15-16 hour overnights.

now to check ATL M88 4 day.... mostly 22-23 hours, 14 legs most of the time, overnights thanks to 117 now 11-18 hours.

so, long range jumbo RJ trips dont seem that bad at all, in fact, IF JBs four day was indicative of trip construction possibilities then the jumbo RJ trips would be an improvement.

SO if its not the trip construction then what is it about jumbo RJs we wouldnt want? is it that theyre not as advanced as mainline jets like the 88?



okay, maybe its too advanced?

Last edited by forgot to bid; 03-03-2014 at 06:15 AM.
Old 03-03-2014 | 05:59 AM
  #150498  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
I don't believe TC for a nanosecond. There will always be a vote "just around the corner"...but strangely enough I don't think that there ever will be one. But the DPA will also never go away, because ultimately it is about one thing: TC's obsession and anger about the fact that he was furloughed a few years ago, and blames NWA/Delta and ALPA with nearly every waking thought.

The worse part is that this is not leading to a unified pilot force that is the most fundamental element in securing a great contract. But I don't think TC cares. While ALPA national and our own DALPA are correctly focusing on the Emirates and Norwegian Air schemes that could annihilate our industry, the DPA continues to look like a bunch of buffoons, more interested in who hacked their website than in the long term prosperity and viability of this profession.

So...hey DPA, I am asking you to call for a vote and resolve this, or go away and once again support your current representative body, which is DALPA. If you win the election, I will be a good member of the union, just as I like to think that I am now.

But please, let's have some closure here!
+717..........
Old 03-03-2014 | 06:01 AM
  #150499  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by kiteflyer
Bring back the RJ's to Delta. Start with the 76 seat Jets. They always were Delta Jobs. They Still are Delta Jobs. It's time a pilot with a Delta seniority number signs the release while flying one.
Not if we have to pay 1 red cent to get 'em. For goodness' sake, pay attention. The regional airline experiment is imploding before your very eyes.
Old 03-03-2014 | 06:04 AM
  #150500  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Not if we have to pay 1 red cent to get 'em. For goodness' sake, pay attention. The regional airline experiment is imploding before your very eyes.
Exactly, I believe management is going to WANT to bring them in house. Last year fewer than 70 CFI's were issued. This from an FAA inspector.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices