![]() |
|
So while the following insight from this Google VP in charge of hiring is good for your high school and college aged kids, I still think it applies well to pilots of every age, background, hours, seniority, etc...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/op...at-google.html 1) The No. 1 thing we look for is general cognitive ability, and it’s not I.Q. It’s learning ability. It’s the ability to process on the fly. It’s the ability to pull together disparate bits of information. 2) “...leadership — in particular emergent leadership as opposed to traditional leadership.... What we care about is when faced with a problem and you’re a member of a team, do you, at the appropriate time, step in and lead. And just as critically, do you step back and stop leading, do you let someone else? Because what’s critical to be an effective leader in this environment is you have to be willing to relinquish power.” 3) Humility and ownership. “It’s feeling the sense of responsibility, the sense of ownership, to step in,” he said, to try to solve any problem — and the humility to step back and embrace the better ideas of others. 4) “intellectual humility. Without humility, you are unable to learn.” It is why research shows that many graduates from hotshot business schools plateau. “Successful bright people rarely experience failure, and so they don’t learn how to learn from that failure,” said Bock. 5) Your degree is not a proxy for your ability to do any job. The world only cares about — and pays off on — what you can do with what you know (and it doesn’t care how you learned it). And in an age when innovation is increasingly a group endeavor, it also cares about a lot of soft skills — leadership, humility, collaboration, adaptability and loving to learn and re-learn. This will be true no matter where you go to work. |
Originally Posted by jethikoki
(Post 1594322)
Because of the McCaskill Bond amendment a major cannot just throw all pilots to the curb when it buys another major.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1594417)
An economist noted that as Obama threatens Russia it is not likely we are going to use an Ohio Class Sub in the way it was designed to be used, but ... there is something we could do to slap Russia around pretty hard.
That's 5% of Russia's GDP. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1594594)
see SWA/ATI
|
767 and 330 high five!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/j0f93ywsl8...%2048%2029.mp4 On second thought, it looks like a girl fight as they wave back up and forth at each other. |
There had better be a strong response to the idea of putting MPL in US cockpits taking away a widebody FO slot.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1594612)
767 and 330 high five!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/j0f93ywsl8...%2048%2029.mp4 On second thought, it looks like a girl fight as they wave back up and forth at each other. |
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1594634)
At least the wing walker noticed it and tried to stop it.
And as it turns out, two in a day for AA! American Airlines Jet Clips Concrete Pillar « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth Brand new A319, too. |
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1594633)
There had better be a strong response to the idea of putting MPL in US cockpits taking away a widebody FO slot.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1594103)
...The "RJ Defense Coalition" gained it's name as a result of the Contract 2000 scope metrics which did not work from inception. To explain; the ratio of mainline to RJ flying was basically 1/3 to 2/3. With 500+ new RJ's coming from a prior order, the Delta fleet would have had to grown by 1,500+ to keep up. It seemed everyone on the express side of the house knew contract 2000 could not function as designed without major changes. The RJ guys figured "their" airplane order was going to get cancelled so that Delta could remain in compliance. Thus the name ... the RJ Defense Coalition...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands