Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

sailingfun 03-10-2014 02:35 AM


Originally Posted by FL370 (Post 1598941)
Door pay could be really important down the road. The FARs haven't changed, operators abilty to monitor forward movement under own power has. It started with the 777 and the EMB-145. All new [certified] airplanes since have been installed with wheel speed sensors [that can be recorded via the AirInc 429 bus.] This is not NEW - my previous carrier tried to do this is in 2003/04 but we stopped them with door pay and protections of recorded data.

Where is this wheel pay rumor coming from? I talked to a rep and he has heard nothing. The FAR's state flight time is logged from the first movement of the aircraft with intent for flight. It starts at pushback. The contract says the exact same thing as far as how we get paid. Is this another version of forum hysteria that seems so common?

TOGA LK 03-10-2014 02:44 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1598964)
So the 787 is nearing certification.


I mean A350. The 787 is being certified as it goes.

Ouch! Are you saying you'd rather have a bus than a Franken-plane slapped together abroad by the lowest bidder?

Boomer 03-10-2014 02:45 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1599125)
Where is this wheel pay rumor coming from? I talked to a rep and he has heard nothing. The FAR's state flight time is logged from the first movement of the aircraft under its own power with intent for flight. It starts at pushback. The contract says the exact same thing as far as how we get paid. Is this another version of forum hysteria that seems so common?

The FAR Chapter 1 definition of "Flight Time" includes the bolded piece. FWIW.

sailingfun 03-10-2014 02:54 AM

Deleted by poster

maddogmax 03-10-2014 03:34 AM


Originally Posted by Boomer (Post 1599127)
The FAR Chapter 1 definition of "Flight Time" includes the bolded piece. FWIW.

Remember those 2 America West pilots that were charged with flying intoxicated? (One was Glen Campbell's son-in-law). Their defense was that since they were never released from the tug, they were never under their own power for flight. They lost!

formerdal 03-10-2014 03:46 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1598810)
Wheel spin up on scale is a thousand times more of a concession than zero recovery. Also, there is a huge difference between an innocent line holder being victimized by a cruel and unusual recovery reroute as opposed to a buddy bidding tripple dipper. Huge difference. Some guys benefitted from trip parking too, why not bring that back? Wouldn't that help unstovepipe the list, etc?

I'm all in favor of numerous and very strong protections for any potential OE recovery. I just don't see the current system surviving the next big round or two of bargaining. It would be one thing if we were back to the glory days of Cadillac per month pay and 6 weeks of touch drop and all that, but those days are gone and some of that is never coming back. The entire seniority list, lineholder and reserve, narrow and wide body alike, endures shortcomings to not only pay but work rules and rigs that can, by far, be better applied more equitably than by creating a small number of windfall micro empires that laywer trick the system into getting the entire month off or working a regular schedule for triple pay as a result of intentionally trying to get it (no victim abrogation necesary).

A lot will depend on the 117 concessions. Right now we have nothing on day one prior to noon for reserves. That is a huge QOL issue for locals and for commuters (most of the pilot group) it is a critical enhancement that must not be bargained away to return to the rediculous days of "last day off schedule check" and commuting the afternoon of your last "golden day" every time, etc. Also long call is an issue. Right now its essentially de facto 19 hours, plus the huge force multiplier of the 3 hours notification issue. Obviously that last part will be bargained away, but what will LC end up being? Back to 12 will be a massive concession. Will we throw reserves under the bus for something as nebulous with unintended consequences as door pay?

In addition to shafting reserves that could end up being a massive productivity gift to the company as every single flight in the system magically becomes 5-10 minutes less. Put that in your staffing formula and see what it comes up to, not even including the instant reductions of required reserves across the board for fewer illegalities and more staffing flexibility for the company to build more reliable 8-9 hour unaugmented block days with lower risk.

We could be on the verge of huge concessions, yet some people would rather eat those than lose the windfall of 2 or 3 guys per category who can buddy bid the entire month off as if that were some necessary entitlement for pilot QOL. I disagree and depending on where other things go with these negotiations, that low hanging fruit will probably fall off the tree on its own anyway.


Which is it? At one point it sounds like your saying the company is going to go broke with guys getting bumped for OE (by the way you are making a huge assumption that everyone will be getting greenies during that time-I'm sure some just enjoy the time off).....Then you say its only 2 or 3 guys per category.

You seem like a very intelligent guy but you get caught up in these rants over and over again, the sky isn't falling but you sure make it out to be....

MoonShot 03-10-2014 04:58 AM

I've been displaced for OE probably 5-6 times the last year or so. I sure hope we don't give it up for anything! I'm one guy from the bottom, so it isn't just a "select senior few" that are getting good deals.

boog123 03-10-2014 05:14 AM

How do other airlines do augmented trans con rotations. Just curious how that would work from like NYC to LAX and back in one day, if it's possible

TANSTAAFL 03-10-2014 05:28 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1599125)
Where is this wheel pay rumor coming from? I talked to a rep and he has heard nothing. The FAR's state flight time is logged from the first movement of the aircraft with intent for flight. It starts at pushback. The contract says the exact same thing as far as how we get paid. Is this another version of forum hysteria that seems so common?

If the PWA is more restrictive than the FAR, and there is the latitude to interpret "movement" every company will try and make this the new standard. It might not be us, but only one legacy has to cave and every management will attempt to make it the new pattern bargaining norm.

With the pressure to shave minutes on every leg with 117 there is tremendous incentive for managements everywhere to pursue this. Of course one could argue that if it's a PWA vs. FAR restriction door pay could be just as vulnerable to being negotiated away as pushback.

Expect it to come under assault either way. I'm sure someone will come up with a TVM argument that X pay raise would still be a win over trading to wheel spin up/GPS/eng power :eek:

RonRicco 03-10-2014 05:31 AM

I have to say, this has become a very interesting debate over a topic I really never thought I would hear pilots complaining about. (I should have known better)

So, to break it down. Pilot A gets a good deal because he has decided to stay senior in category. Pilot B, although at some point, or even possibly now could bid a category to give him the same option, would rather take away the pilot A's (and every pilots) potential option and redistribute that among the other pilots.

Where do we stop with this line of thinking? Those senior 777 guys who get weekends, holidays, and get to fly to places other than MLU? Do we start breaking up that club as well and giving that time off to the rest of the pilot group?

This almost sounds like that debate where a pilot wanted to increase the reserves required on the weekends where pilots wouldn't be able to drop trips and less green slips would go out (therefore giving a reserve less chance of flying on the weekend). Really?

For what it is worth, I am neither neither senior in category or an FO, but I would be against taking away the current recovery rules for them.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands