Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 03-07-2014 | 01:22 PM
  #150991  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

As shocking as $1.27 Million sounds, if it's even that high(doubtful), is sadly not even close enough to sit at any of the big player tables in DC. This is why a National union doesn't make sense, as we will never have the resources to make positive change. So the only thing we are left with is the conflict of interest, without a national list or even basic unity.
Old 03-07-2014 | 01:38 PM
  #150992  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
No doubt, however I was talking to Plato R a good bit at the time and if you check the history it was stopped in the very same month we inked the contract. The company no longer needed as many pilots.
The contract was inked in July. The industry had been in free fall since April. The 01 contract I don't recall having much influence on staffing. If you were talking about the 96 contract or LOA 46 or the 1113 contract I would agree with you. In fact I pointed out on this forum many times that work rule changes were a bigger factor then RJ's. In the early nineties we averaged around 600 block hours per pilot. That number us now around 800 hours. The problem however is that we are still at the bottom relative to the industry in productivity. You can blame SWAPA for that. The industry made huge gains in quality of life. Almost every contract was a step forward. Then along came a airline ignored at first that flew their pilots to FAR maximums. Soon they achieved critical mass and the reckoning started. Quality of life began to suffer the death by a thousand cuts for the sake of competing with SWA. Even with the givebacks they were far more productive. They could go into any legacy market at will and do well. They sustained 10% growth year after year and soon became the largest domestic airline in the US. The axe fell on the legacies via the 1113 process and we all started working more like the SWAPA model. This was followed by the end of growth at SWA since they could no longer take market share at will. Why so many Delta pilots seem to hold SWAPA as a paragon of what a union should be eludes me!

Last edited by sailingfun; 03-07-2014 at 01:55 PM.
Old 03-07-2014 | 02:05 PM
  #150993  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The contract was inked in July. The industry had been in free fall since April. The 01 contract I don't recall having much influence on staffing. If you were talking about the 96 contract or LOA 46 or the 1113 contract I would agree with you. In fact I pointed out on this forum many times that work rule changes were a bigger factor then RJ's. In the early nineties we averaged around 600 block hours per pilot. That number us now around 800 hours. The problem however is that we are still at the bottom relative to the industry in productivity. You can blame SWAPA for that. The industry made huge gains in quality of life. Almost every contract was a step forward. Then along came a airline ignored at first that flew their pilots to FAR maximums. Soon they achieved critical mass and the reckoning started. Quality of life began to suffer the death by a thousand cuts for the sake of competing with SWA. Even with the givebacks they were far more productive. They could go into any legacy market at will and do well. They sustained 10% growth year after year and soon became the largest domestic airline in the US. The axe fell on the legacies via the 1113 process and we all started working more like the SWAPA model. This was followed by the end of growth at SWA since they could no longer take market share at will. Why so many Delta pilots seem to hold SWAPA as a paragon of what a union should be eludes me!
BINGO!! Your analysis is spot on.
Old 03-07-2014 | 02:22 PM
  #150994  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
BINGO!! Your analysis is spot on.
It wasn't just SWA, but also JB and AT that were also allowed to enter endless growth mode and reach critical mass. Fortunately MaxJet and Eos went away, VX was delayed a couple years and SkyBus II imploded under its own business model. JB and VX together have grown into a ton of capacity and they have plans for more endless growth and code shares with the Gulf airlines and probably NAI eventually. We can't run from marketshare wars anymore. While we have to show some modicum of restraint against the other legacies, its time to take it to the LCC's with very agressive targeted assaults and slam the door on their growth ambitions. Where their business model goes from there isn't our concern. We can start by each legacy taking the top 10-20 routes from one of them each and just burying them. That is exactly what they are going to continue to do to us if we permit their growth to continue unchecked.
Old 03-07-2014 | 02:37 PM
  #150995  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Default

I don't think 1.3 is too much for a national union president. I think the union leadership at Delta and ALPA national has been good under his watch.
Old 03-07-2014 | 03:11 PM
  #150996  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The contract was inked in July. The industry had been in free fall since April. The 01 contract I don't recall having much influence on staffing. If you were talking about the 96 contract or LOA 46 or the 1113 contract I would agree with you. In fact I pointed out on this forum many times that work rule changes were a bigger factor then RJ's. In the early nineties we averaged around 600 block hours per pilot. That number us now around 800 hours. The problem however is that we are still at the bottom relative to the industry in productivity. You can blame SWAPA for that. The industry made huge gains in quality of life. Almost every contract was a step forward. Then along came a airline ignored at first that flew their pilots to FAR maximums. Soon they achieved critical mass and the reckoning started. Quality of life began to suffer the death by a thousand cuts for the sake of competing with SWA. Even with the givebacks they were far more productive. They could go into any legacy market at will and do well. They sustained 10% growth year after year and soon became the largest domestic airline in the US. The axe fell on the legacies via the 1113 process and we all started working more like the SWAPA model. This was followed by the end of growth at SWA since they could no longer take market share at will. Why so many Delta pilots seem to hold SWAPA as a paragon of what a union should be eludes me!
The contract c2k, was also based on an economy that had multi-billion dollar companies where their most valuable asset was a sock puppet. However, that economy has actually returned, so restoration is really not too much to ask from the group.
Old 03-07-2014 | 04:05 PM
  #150997  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
I saw that number too. Yes, it's a lot of money. But how was the calculus done? I know if you take our total compensation (insurance, retirement etc...) it pumps the number up quite a lot. LM gets a housing allowance, vehicle allowance, and other things. It is a good gig, that's for sure.
At the end of the day, whether cash, allowances, or whatever...we're paying him with our money.

And that's just one guy. We're not even breaking down the other deadweight and waste up there yet.
Old 03-07-2014 | 04:13 PM
  #150998  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 106
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Why so many Delta pilots seem to hold SWAPA as a paragon of what a union should be eludes me!
Sailing,

Your analysis is outstanding, but there is one area where I believe SWA has always had us beat, and that is in the area of guaranteed pay per day. Let's face it, most pilots want to work when we show up to work, not dawdle and get min guarantee. To summarize:

SWA guys get paid by the "trip" with is roughly a unit of distance equal to 53 minutes, or 1 trip = 1.13 hours.

SWA captains get roughly the same hourly pay per "trip" as a DAL 767 captain does per hour!

So, sort of equating the two pay rates, now consider....


The reserve guarantee at SWA is 90 (!) trips a month.

The minimum pay per day is 6.5 trips (at DAL 767 pay rates). Every one day pays at least 6.5 trips (or TFP, Trips For Pay), every two day is worth 13, every three-day 19.5, etc.

A MDW-LAS-MDW turn was profiled in one of their publications. It blocked at 7.55, which would make it a very senior turn at most airlines, including DAL. It paid 9.3 trips! (at DAL 767 rates).

I would like to see us emulate such. We are getting there, but have a ways to go.
Old 03-07-2014 | 04:34 PM
  #150999  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Sailing,

Your analysis is outstanding, but there is one area where I believe SWA has always had us beat, and that is in the area of guaranteed pay per day. Let's face it, most pilots want to work when we show up to work, not dawdle and get min guarantee. To summarize:

SWA guys get paid by the "trip" with is roughly a unit of distance equal to 53 minutes, or 1 hour = 1.13 trips.

SWA captains get roughly the same hourly pay per "trip" as a DAL 767 captain does per hour!

So, sort of equating the two pay rates, now consider....


The reserve guarantee at SWA is 90 (!) trips a month.

The minimum pay per day is 6.5 trips (at DAL 767 pay rates). Every one day pays at least 6.5 trips (or TFP, Trips For Pay), every two day is worth at least 13, every three-day at least 19.5, etc.

A MDW-LAS-MDW turn was profiled in one of their publications. It blocked at 7.55, which would make it a very senior turn at most airlines, including DAL. It paid 9.3 trips! (at DAL 767 rates).

I would like to see us emulate such. We are getting there, but have a ways to go.
edited for correctness
Old 03-07-2014 | 05:05 PM
  #151000  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Hey boyz,

Quick question. Is CQ credit or pay only?

Ferd
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices