![]() |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 691903)
Oh what a victory for the pilot group. Regional FO wages that are soooo livable. Plus that did a whole lot for the guys on the street. Give me a break, what a joke.:rolleyes:
Compass was developed by the NWA MEC. You can take up with them whether or not they thought it was a joke. If I'm not mistaken, weren't you hired by NWA after the development of Compass and all NWA furloughees were offered recall?:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 691922)
So I guess you view the whole Compass operation as a joke, right?
Compass was developed by the NWA MEC. You can take up with them whether or not they thought it was a joke. If I'm not mistaken, weren't you hired by NWA after the development of Compass and all NWA furloughees were offered recall?:rolleyes: I know you are aware that the CPZ flowback provides immediate access to a CA position, which certainly pays much more then 1st or even 4th year FO pay. No sarcasm intended in this post, just seeking the facts. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 691924)
Perhaps I misunderstood, but did said DAL furloughees go to the Left Seat at these DCI's? Or did they get a job as an FO? How was the pay? Was it 1st year?
I know you are aware that the CPZ flowback provides immediate access to a CA position, which certainly pays much more then 1st or even 4th year FO pay. No sarcasm intended in this post, just seeking the facts. We did not have a flow during our previous 2 furloughs. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 691927)
To be clear, there are only 150 or so Captain positions at CPZ. The rest are FO positions. At our scale, should a furlough happen not everyone furloughed will be flowing to a Captain seat.
We did not have a flow during our previous 2 furloughs. My point is that the Flowback at CPZ is worth FAR more then pref hiring at regionals. I think something like the J4J's program was an insult. I know that the DAL pilot group wasn't involved in that, I'm just using it as an example. If we actually protected our flying then we wouldn't need these flowbacks and pref hiring. :mad: |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 691931)
My point is that the Flowback at CPZ is worth FAR more then pref hiring at regionals. I think something like the J4J's program was an insult. I know that the DAL pilot group wasn't involved in that, I'm just using it as an example. If we actually protected our flying then we wouldn't need these flowbacks and pref hiring. :mad:
If we had "perfect" scope, those would be Delta pilot furloughs. If we had "perfect" scope, many of those Delta pilots would be flying in the FO seat at regional FO wages. As it is, we currently have no Delta pilot furloughs. Every other legacy does. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 691945)
As it is, we currently have no Delta pilot furloughs. Every other legacy does.
Just like the shrinking of the regionals right now, this is not due to any actions that ALPA has done. Would you agree with this? Or can you prove otherwise without giving the same statistical rundown which doesn't show any actions on ALPA's part... |
My question is if the CPS aircraft are awarded,sold or otherwise not attached to the airline what happens to the flow agreement? When it becomes unavailable and DAL argues that the flow was with CPS and not the jets there is not a judge or arbitrator that will side with DALPA. The trigger will be gone the flow will be gone and we will have no protection against it.
IMHO this is huge. What did we get for it? A promise? |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 691952)
My question is if the CPS aircraft are awarded,sold or otherwise not attached to the airline what happens to the flow agreement? When it becomes unavailable and DAL argues that the flow was with CPS and not the jets there is not a judge or arbitrator that will side with DALPA. The trigger will be gone the flow will be gone and we will have no protection against it.
IMHO this is huge. What did we get for it? A promise? e. once the number of permitted 76-seat jets is established, it will not be reduced. Exception one: If a pilot on the seniority list with an employment date prior to September 1, 2001 is placed on furlough, the Company will convert all 76-seat jets for operation as 70-seat jets. Exception two: In the event the flow provisions of NWA LOA 2006-10 and LOA 2006-14 cease to be available, either at the feeder carrier affiliate referenced in such LOAs or at another carrier, the number of jet aircraft configured with 71-76 passenger seats specified in Section 1 B. 40. d. will revert to 85. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 691952)
My question is if the CPS aircraft are awarded,sold or otherwise not attached to the airline what happens to the flow agreement? When it becomes unavailable and DAL argues that the flow was with CPS and not the jets there is not a judge or arbitrator that will side with DALPA. The trigger will be gone the flow will be gone and we will have no protection against it.
IMHO this is huge. What did we get for it? A promise? Did this really need to happen now, as NuGuy asked? Was there any apparent reason for some sense of urgency? Could it not have been postponed for another six months, or longer? I think that Delta is now fully prepared to furlough and not have one single pilot flow back to Compass. Hopefully the economy gets in gear and makes it a moot point. Otherwise, I can see them trying to pull some card out of their sleeve to avoid not only the cost of flowing back pilots, but the huge mess it would be in general. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 691954)
Exception two: In the event the flow provisions of NWA LOA 2006-10 and LOA 2006-14 cease to be available, either at the feeder carrier affiliate referenced in such LOAs or at another carrier, the number of jet aircraft configured with 71-76 passenger seats specified in Section 1 B. 40. d. will revert to 85.
Didn't I read somewhere these flow provisions are being ignored at ASA and Comair? Nu |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands