Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Bucking Bar 10-10-2009 05:56 AM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 691782)
Stupid question? Could there be a class action lawsuit against Alpa National for their continuing support of regional pilot groups which directly compete with our jobs, pay and benefits, and quality of life -- and as history has shown, have had increases in jobs, pay and benefits, and quality of life, while the mainline pilots lossed in all of these areas?

It sounds to me that Alpa failed to take care of #1. And #1 is angry.

KC10 - what's the cause of action? I don't understand - OUR Reps negotiated these deals, OUR scope controls this outsourcing, WE voted for it.

Why do you suggest we sue ALPA National? Really, what have they got to do with this? It is a serious question and I hope that you will respond and educate me with your point of view.

johnso29 10-10-2009 05:57 AM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 691782)
Stupid question? Could there be a class action lawsuit against Alpa National for their continuing support of regional pilot groups which directly compete with our jobs, pay and benefits, and quality of life -- and as history has shown, have had increases in jobs, pay and benefits, and quality of life, while the mainline pilots lossed in all of these areas?

It sounds to me that Alpa failed to take care of #1. And #1 is angry.


I'm not sure, but I'm pretty interested myself. I'm not interested in ousting ALPA, but they screwed the pooch on representing non WO regional
pilot groups. I don't understand how they can enhance & protect our careers while simultaneously doing the same for a pilot group who fly aircraft that we have a payscale for.

I hope Behnke's coffin is buried tight, because I think he's been rolling over in it for years. :mad:

mynameisjim 10-10-2009 06:02 AM

Its interesting to me that this move was made under the guise of protection from litigation and conflict of interest. With CPS under DALPA, who could file a lawsuit? Once given their own MEC, resolutions and lawsuits are a possibility that didn't exist before.

Hell, even with the support of many Delta pilots CPS couldn't enact change under DALPA. But now they can, and that's scary.

acl65pilot 10-10-2009 06:02 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 691785)
ACL,

I agree. I think RA is too smart to outsource the 100 seater. He knows the massive waves it would cause, & if he wants to improve the DAL product then outsourcing 100 seaters to DCI would be a HUGE mistake.

I think we will get the 100 seat jet, but it does not mean that they will not put on a good show.

Bucking Bar 10-10-2009 06:11 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 691790)
I think we will get the 100 seat jet, but it does not mean that they will not put on a good show.

I think if we put up a fight for the 76 seaters at Compass, the battle would not be at 100 seats.

Scoop 10-10-2009 06:12 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 691785)
ACL,

I agree. I think RA is too smart to outsource the 100 seater. He knows the massive waves it would cause, & if he wants to improve the DAL product then outsourcing 100 seaters to DCI would be a HUGE mistake.


Johnso,

Thats a big "if." RA talks a great game, but talk is cheap, what do his actions say? Time will tell, but if you ask me the jury is still out on RA.

Scoop

acl65pilot 10-10-2009 06:13 AM

The only reason I can see us doing this, is that we cannot represent someone or a group that we are promoting getting downsized, with scope restoration et al.

Problem with that is that almost 1/2 of the MEC disagreed.

acl65pilot 10-10-2009 06:14 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 691794)
I think if we put up a fight for the 76 seaters at Compass, the battle would not be at 100 seats.

Roosevelt's speech on December 8, 1941 ...

Yeah, so Japan attacked a little island in the pacific. Who cares? It was a Seagull crap crusted volcanic hell hole that no one wants anyway. Let Hirohito have it. There were not many Americans on that Island and the ones that were there look a lot like Japanese to me anyway. I mean even if they take Catalina, or the Germans take Sannibel, or Alaska, who cares? You can't see it from my house... .

Bar that has been my point all a long. We do not need to retreat farther in to the trees, they will just continue to shell the trees.

Bucking Bar 10-10-2009 06:16 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 691796)
The only reason I can see us doing this, is that we cannot represent someone or a group that we are promoting getting downsized, with scope restoration et al.

Problem with that is that almost 1/2 of the MEC disagreed.

Almost half the MEC understands that Compass is a place holder for Delta jobs.

The closest to a rational explanation has been provided by Alpha, Slowplay and others who simply point out the 76 seat labor market is so ugly that we really don't want to be in it. I can see the merit in those economic arguments and will argue back that the politics of divisiveness almost always has an economic basis in fact.

iceman49 10-10-2009 06:18 AM

Did anyone see an agenda published for this MEC meeting in DCA, also since RA was there does anyone know if he weighed in on the Compass discussion?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands