Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 05-23-2014 | 12:12 PM
  #158341  
qball's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 1
From: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
Just on 1-day trips, as far as I can tell.
I recall NW had 4:15 min day for all trips...it got changed to 5 avg some time before BK if memory serves.
Old 05-23-2014 | 12:12 PM
  #158342  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Well, anytime things like this happen, we need to try to learn from it. Lots of great comments about the learning points of staying engaged and never shutting up or giving up. But tops on my list is our old friend the memory rat. This new amendment to our PWA is over 20 pages and touches many aspect of our working lives. How on Earth could this have not gone to MEMRAT? And please don't use the excuse of cost as that's such an obvious red herring.

I applaud our reps from NYC, MSP, DTW, the F/O rep from CVG and the training rep in ATL. Regardless of where you stood on the TA itself, the fact that you gentlemen pushed to have the pilots you represent decide such a comprehensive change to the PWA makes me very proud of you. The 11 reps who voted against having the pilots decide should be recalled immediately. Regardless of where you stood on the merits of the TA, you've failed in the most basic duty of being a rep.

Donatelli must be recalled immediately as well. For someone touted as such a tough guy with strike committee experience, he's shown himself to be every bit as weak and aligned with management's interests as O'Malley. He tried to snow the pilots he's supposed to be looking out for. Deception shouldn't be rewarded with continued tenure.

I urge the pilots of the LAX, SLC, SEA, CVG and ATL bases to make the rep changes that will also make the MEC chairman change. Let's try to get this right before Section 6 for C2015 begins. We've got almost a year to go. Lets get this right!

Carl
Old 05-23-2014 | 12:18 PM
  #158343  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 106
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Well, anytime things like this happen, we need to try to learn from it. Lots of great comments about the learning points of staying engaged and never shutting up or giving up. But tops on my list is our old friend the memory rat. This new amendment to our PWA is over 20 pages and touches many aspect of our working lives. How on Earth could this have not gone to MEMRAT? And please don't use the excuse of cost as that's such an obvious red herring.

I applaud our reps from NYC, MSP, DTW, the F/O rep from CVG and the training rep in ATL. Regardless of where you stood on the TA itself, the fact that you gentlemen pushed to have the pilots you represent decide such a comprehensive change to the PWA makes me very proud of you. The 11 reps who voted against having the pilots decide should be recalled immediately. Regardless of where you stood on the merits of the TA, you've failed in the most basic duty of being a rep.

Donatelli must be recalled immediately as well. For someone touted as such a tough guy with strike committee experience, he's shown himself to be every bit as weak and aligned with management's interests as O'Malley. He tried to snow the pilots he's supposed to be looking out for. Deception shouldn't be rewarded with continued tenure.

I urge the pilots of the LAX, SLC, SEA, CVG and ATL bases to make the rep changes that will also make the MEC chairman change. Let's try to get this right before Section 6 for C2015 begins. We've got almost a year to go. Lets get this right!

Carl
I think you are being a bit hystrionic. This TA is all positive--do we really need to go through the motions?

Had the SDPs been kept, then absolutely it should have gone to memrat. In fact I emailed my reps urging them to do exactly that (as a minimum) before the SDPs were finally deleted.

No work rule changes were made, except in our favor. Nothing was changed at all, except in our favor. The only thing the company got was a firm set of ground rules for themselves as they assign flying to reserves. They paid dearly for those clear cut rules.

I applaud the entire MEC. I don't think sending this to memrat was a dealbreaker in its current form.
Old 05-23-2014 | 12:28 PM
  #158344  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
I think you are being a bit hystrionic. This TA is all positive--do we really need to go through the motions?

Had the SDPs been kept, then absolutely it should have gone to memrat. In fact I emailed my reps urging them to do exactly that (as a minimum) before the SDPs were finally deleted.

No work rule changes were made, except in our favor. Nothing was changed at all, except in our favor. The only thing the company got was a firm set of ground rules for themselves as they assign flying to reserves. They paid dearly for those clear cut rules.

I applaud the entire MEC. I don't think sending this to memrat was a dealbreaker in its current form.

+717.............
Old 05-23-2014 | 12:31 PM
  #158345  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: 7ER Capt
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun

The MEC was not out of touch

Not according to the two dozen pilots I spoke with over the last 48hrs... let's just agree to disagree.

There were a lot of former NW pilots who flew and liked the trips and that feedback went to the MEC via reps in those bases.

Define a lot... again, see above... plus reference the loud outcry.

I just talked with a NW guy who is mad they removed them.

"A" NW guy? Doesn't seem very statistically significant.


When CDO's went public it became obvious that overall the pilot group by a substantial margin did not want them and they were removed

This is a large part of the problem... very few line pilots new about the SDPs until the last second... we came way too close to eating this one.


Finally, I doubt seriously that 50.1% of the pilot group asked for SDPs in the last survey. They are unsafe and have no business in our contract. Our MEC should be ashamed to have even considered these for our pilot group. Period.
Old 05-23-2014 | 12:40 PM
  #158346  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
But hasn't the notice for short call been increased by the same two hours from 10 to 12? IOW, yesterday I got 10 hours notice for short call and could use the first two of those hours to commute. Now, I get 12 hours notice and use the same two hours (the ones from 10 to 12) to commute.

What's the difference?
2 hours at the end of short call if you don't get used. For the widebody commuters, it's a wash. They now get 12 hours notice, can't use the 2 hour commute, but their short call was reduced from 14 to 12 hours. For the narrowbody guys, this is a concession. Truthfully, we are so short I don't see anyone not getting used on short call until the slow season so it's not a huge concession.
Old 05-23-2014 | 12:43 PM
  #158347  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
I think you are being a bit hystrionic. This TA is all positive--do we really need to go through the motions?

Had the SDPs been kept, then absolutely it should have gone to memrat. In fact I emailed my reps urging them to do exactly that (as a minimum) before the SDPs were finally deleted.

No work rule changes were made, except in our favor. Nothing was changed at all, except in our favor. The only thing the company got was a firm set of ground rules for themselves as they assign flying to reserves. They paid dearly for those clear cut rules.

I applaud the entire MEC. I don't think sending this to memrat was a dealbreaker in its current form.
We will now schedule to FAR max instead of contractual max. Prepare to be scheduled for 13:30 duty days. That is a concession that will be used to reduce credit with our new 5:15 ADG.
Old 05-23-2014 | 12:43 PM
  #158348  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Why would the Navy have anything to do with it? That's obviously Air Force.
And the rope just gets tighter........
Old 05-23-2014 | 12:48 PM
  #158349  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Well, anytime things like this happen, we need to try to learn from it. Lots of great comments about the learning points of staying engaged and never shutting up or giving up. But tops on my list is our old friend the memory rat. This new amendment to our PWA is over 20 pages and touches many aspect of our working lives. How on Earth could this have not gone to MEMRAT? And please don't use the excuse of cost as that's such an obvious red herring.

I applaud our reps from NYC, MSP, DTW, the F/O rep from CVG and the training rep in ATL. Regardless of where you stood on the TA itself, the fact that you gentlemen pushed to have the pilots you represent decide such a comprehensive change to the PWA makes me very proud of you. The 11 reps who voted against having the pilots decide should be recalled immediately. Regardless of where you stood on the merits of the TA, you've failed in the most basic duty of being a rep.

Donatelli must be recalled immediately as well. For someone touted as such a tough guy with strike committee experience, he's shown himself to be every bit as weak and aligned with management's interests as O'Malley. He tried to snow the pilots he's supposed to be looking out for. Deception shouldn't be rewarded with continued tenure.

I urge the pilots of the LAX, SLC, SEA, CVG and ATL bases to make the rep changes that will also make the MEC chairman change. Let's try to get this right before Section 6 for C2015 begins. We've got almost a year to go. Lets get this right!

Carl
Why waste the money going to memrat? Seriously, it's just ****ing our money away. You and I both know this would have passed easily. The reps voted for it 19-0. It would have been at least 90 percent yes if it would have gone to memrat. It is dumb to waste money just so we can feel like we had more of a say. I honestly would vote for it and I'm pretty extreme. Paying reserves like lineholders was my biggest gripe on reserve. I felt like I was on a "B" scale.

BTW, you and I both know now DPA is never going to happen. It's time for it to go away as it will start costing us unity which in turn will cost our entire pilot group money.
Old 05-23-2014 | 12:49 PM
  #158350  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Maddoggin
Speaking of CDO's. This trip didn't pay 10.5 either. This is about as bad of a CDO as they get. I'm assuming this was a cover for a late flight but they can still create CDO like trips when convenient and FAR 117 legal.
Remember right now there is an ADG exemption window from 2200-2359. That is eliminated in the new LOA. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but now I believe that would pay 10:30 (come November).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices