![]() |
No it doesn't. That is exactly what I am trying to prevent. I can not do a SC to LGA or JFK. And since the number of trips out of LGA and JFK dwarf those out of EWR, then the schedulers aren't going to waste a body for EWR. This is just my case. There are others who could get to EWR and LGA but not JFK. And so on.
If you are on SC, then you must be within reporting distance to any of the three airports. If notify you for a SC to EWR and you're at the Kew, tell them "its going to be a while." They may know guys like me who can cover it. And often they do. I tell you what, can the company pay for my tolls? That Verazzano Bridge is now $13 bucks one way and that is just the tip of the iceberg. Corzine raised the tolls in NJ in some cases up 300%. I routinely spend a minimum $150 bucks each month just to drive to and from work (3-4 trips a month). So, can the company help me out as well? See my point? I would just recommend that we negotiate reimbursement of a taxi or the use of a crew runner, the same things the FAs have. There are also some companies that will shuttle you there (timing dependent) for like $25 and a tip. But they usually have to have you scheduled so I'm not sure is a SC callout would work. There are options ... but changing the rules midstream for the folks who commute isn't in my opinion fair. |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 695132)
As I side I think three times now, there are much cheaper options than the $85 cab ride. Do your homework. But at the very least, the company could provide some type of shuttle for folks. The FAs have it. Not trying to pick a fight, just want you to see it from a different perspective. I'm glad your decision to live in base worked out, but how will that work when/if you get displaced to the 9 in MSP, DTW or MEM? |
There's a need to have trips start out of EWR, you and I both know this.
Why would I take the subway and/or bus? They will end up costing you the same and depending on where you're trying to go, you will need a minimum of 2-3 hours. Mass transit options are a joke in NYC / NJ. Anyhow, I am against having scheduling determine which base you are going to sit SC or LC for unless they protect the people who played by the rules and got a house in base near one of those bases. If I was displaced out, then I would get a home there. Sorry if this isn't an option for you. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 695154)
I have a hard time with 3% a month. That is 36% YOY. No Way we will dilute like that. Well, maybe but if we expand that much we are going to need 4000 pilots :eek:
The growth that was briefed was 3-5% per year. |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 695132)
How would this work in our case? Assumption, you have a 0600L takeoff out of EWR or JFK. So you report to LGA when at what time? 0230L? Sorry, NOT happening. The traffic in NYC is way too unpredictable to do this.
And again, this ends up screwing people who have homes near certain airports and have the seniority to bid to only those bases. I'm a very junior pilot. I had other options (SLC and LAX) when I selected NYC during indoc. I went with NYC because it was less disruptive. I knew the rules before bidding there. But please, don't be trying to change things for the guys who live in base. As I side I think three times now, there are much cheaper options than the $85 cab ride. Do your homework. But at the very least, the company could provide some type of shuttle for folks. The FAs have it. BD |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 695163)
The growth that was briefed was 3-5% per year.
|
Originally Posted by dragon
(Post 694952)
Why do we let the NYC base serve three airports with no company transpo?
|
Originally Posted by bigdaddie
(Post 695178)
Dude, your missing it. AA only requires that you report to the "Primary Airport." You may at your option report to the airport of departure. Also, they surface transport you so like your JFK - EWR takeoff, if you opted for the surface transport, it would be report (0500) less transport time (1:00) or 4am. AND you get paid the surface deadhead and per deim. Why is that a bad deal?
BD |
Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot
(Post 695181)
I agree with this one, too! I just started in NYC and it's ridiculous that the union hasn't worked something out for us. The FA's get transportation. I take MTA with my flight case and rollerboard... NOT FUN! I don't even want to know what it's going to be like when the winter weather hits!
I think that is a good deal, and at a min we need to work something out like that. |
Originally Posted by bigdaddie
(Post 695178)
Dude, your missing it. AA only requires that you report to the "Primary Airport." You may at your option report to the airport of departure. Also, they surface transport you so like your JFK - EWR takeoff, if you opted for the surface transport, it would be report (0500) less transport time (1:00) or 4am. AND you get paid the surface deadhead and per deim. Why is that a bad deal?
BD If they have transport provided, do I lose my employee parking spot at EWR? Do I get reimbursed for parking at the second airport? Something tells me, no. How do I know this? DAL is already removing parking passes from those of us who fly out of EWR. "It is too expensive for us to provide parking passed now to EWR. You must use long term parking". If they are already doing that, they aren't going to pay for me to park when there's a bus provided. Again, WHY are we proposing going through all this mess for something that is so trivial? The FAs already have it figured out. Why are we trying to reinvent the wheel? Just because a majority of the people who are based in NYC don't live there, doesn' mean that we impose rules that would screw the people who moved or lived in base and played by the rules. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands