Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Mind you I realize the company will argue that there is a pilot shortage and we need more productivity and more time at work and there's your pay raise.
you don't even need more money per hour, at the end of the year you are paid more!
you don't even need more money per hour, at the end of the year you are paid more!
Last edited by forgot to bid; 07-08-2014 at 02:37 AM.
Just thought it was time for the safety video, from Air New Zeland:
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Good Point. But all the earlies are not necessarily 64.
In the coming years, with the bulge of pilots over age 60, I suspect the 1% non-mandatory group will be slightly larger, but it won't be 2x the actual, so if you're looking for predictions:
2015: 300 (170 age 65 plus 130 more)
2016: 370 (230 age 65 plus 140 more)
Last edited by Pineapple Guy; 07-08-2014 at 03:46 AM.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
I am not management. I am not a stockholder. I am an hourly wage worker. I do not change how I conduct my little operation based on corporate profitability.
I want this compensation in my pay rates and work rules. Both for the good years and bad years.
Sorry to burst your bubble. You are a not alone. I share your view about profit sharing.
I am not management. I am not a stockholder. I am an hourly wage worker. I do not change how I conduct my little operation based on corporate profitability.
I want this compensation in my pay rates and work rules. Both for the good years and bad years.
I am not management. I am not a stockholder. I am an hourly wage worker. I do not change how I conduct my little operation based on corporate profitability.
I want this compensation in my pay rates and work rules. Both for the good years and bad years.
They still remember C2K, where we continued to take 4.5% raises while the company was losing literally billions, so they will be hesitant to pay us what we "deserve" without the flexibility to reduce it when the bad times come. So, I'm willing to risk the downside, but keep the upside when its here. It is also a way to pay us more without looking like our payrates are outliers compared to our peers.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
No but they have to be removed from whatever year they would have gone out later. I think we have around 600 retirements planned for 2018. It 300 of those leave between now and 2017 that planned number is down to 300 for 2018 when you start the year.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Sorry to burst your bubble. You are a not alone. I share your view about profit sharing.
I am not management. I am not a stockholder. I am an hourly wage worker. I do not change how I conduct my little operation based on corporate profitability.
I want this compensation in my pay rates and work rules. Both for the good years and bad years.
I am not management. I am not a stockholder. I am an hourly wage worker. I do not change how I conduct my little operation based on corporate profitability.
I want this compensation in my pay rates and work rules. Both for the good years and bad years.
We need to.keep.what we have and make.historic gains.
This is not a concessionary contract.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





