Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 07-18-2014 | 11:45 AM
  #163161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Default

Originally Posted by UGBSM
You are kind of coming across as spoiled. If you don't live in ATL of course you have to commute in, probably the day prior for a short call that early. YOU made that choice when YOU decided not to live in base.

You know it wasn't that long ago when commuting to reserve at all was impossible. Before we had jumpseat and short call was twice a day "windows". Be more grateful. You have more options than I ever did.
It's a valid question. Why treat it with mockery just because you don't see the value in what we had before it was given away?

I really don't see how this even benefits the company to make reserve more difficult for pilots. If I were on reserve and had to come in the night before because I couldn't be out of contact for two hours I still wouldn't be showing up at airport any sooner.
Old 07-18-2014 | 11:47 AM
  #163162  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Default

My question is this. How do we get rid of the long term bureaucrats? (Btw we had a lot of powerful behind the scenes guys at Nwalpa too) Each LEC has a election every (3?) years, so there is a way for the line pilot to affect turnover. How do we, the line pilots help in the cleansing/turnover of the committee positions?

It may be time for alpha, buzz and the gang to take a break and go fly. Whether any of us agree with their positions, we all should thank them for their time and wish them good luck.



Originally Posted by Fly4hire
Alpha,

I'm not talking changing rules after the fact, I'm talking following the ones we have. I think I addressed the dynamics of turning a deal back - the PK of that is it just isn't going to happen, which was intentionally exploited.

It makes the seeking and following of redirection if the box drawn by the MEC for the negotiators to work within is unattainable that much more important. They were outside the box, and did not seek redirection, and it can be argued deliberately so.

As far as condescension, I don't characterize those who make a choice I disagree with as too stupid, lazy or weak. And I'd say you are far more skilled than me in framing and manipulating the discussion to suit your point of view and perspective.
Old 07-18-2014 | 11:49 AM
  #163163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sounds
Sad state of affairs when RT.com has better information regarding our government than we can ever get stateside.
Another ‘RT’ reporter resigns over show’s Russia coverage | New York Post Another ?RT? reporter resigns over show?s Russia coverage | New York Post
Old 07-18-2014 | 11:55 AM
  #163164  
TheManager's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
I think we might be in good shape here. I think UCAL pay-rates go to 2016 and 2017 and lag us by about a year, so their current contract will eventually surpasses our 2015 pay-rates
Not familiar with UCAL

AMR has the snap up to the average of DAL and UCAL and maybe someone else?
They will already surpass us in January 2015. By January 2017, they surpass our A330 A's by $40 per hour.

USAIR is no longer pulling down the weighted average pay.

SWA is the big wildcard - it would be nice to see them get a big increase and pull everyone else up.
They are mired currently in negotiations. This is the true bell weather to watch.

Gary wants PBS. Delta got it in BK for essentially free. SWAPA pilots want a considerable pay raise for it. Gary says there is no $.

Pilots rightly are pointing to savings from PBS as well as revenue lost at the check-in counter vis a vis bag fees.

They are not budging on PBS without considerable pay increases as they will keep trips touching for now, thank you very much.

Fred Smith having same issue at FDX. Wants PBS. Doesn't want to pay up for it as DAL didn't. Then his service failures started happening and now he is changing his tune.


FWIW - at the LAX 16 meeting the above was basically alluded to - any increase in our compensation would greatly influence the compensation of our competition. This could help us out quite a bit.

Scoop
Is the captain rep feeding this bull crap, again? I'd think the FO rep has enough intelligence to not publicly state that, but then again...

Regardless, think about it. Put your RA hat on. He would never do such a thing for the reason given.
Old 07-18-2014 | 12:01 PM
  #163165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
All of that helps. The snap up is a incentive to our management to get it done quickly and perhaps front load the raises to bump the snap up to a higher level. Still UAL won't exceed our rates until 1 Jan 2018. 2 years past our amenable date.
The wild card is pilot sentiment once we reach the amendable date. Delta is running a very efficient operation at the present. Any reduction in the efficiency of the operation could snowball. Historically over the last 15 years unhappy pilots have had little impact on operations. That might be a different story at Delta given the reliance on min staffing. They could however mitigate that with increased hiring or a block hour reduction or both.
You do realize UAL has higher hourly rates on some aircraft than we do today? I.e. 767-400.

And their rates will all exceed our 1/1/15 rates by 3% on 1/1/17 not 2018.
Old 07-18-2014 | 12:03 PM
  #163166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
Alpha,

I'm not talking changing rules after the fact, I'm talking following the ones we have. I think I addressed the dynamics of turning a deal back - the PK of that is it just isn't going to happen, which was intentionally exploited.

It makes the seeking and following of redirection if the box drawn by the MEC for the negotiators to work within is unattainable that much more important. They were outside the box, and did not seek redirection, and it can be argued deliberately so.

As far as condescension, I don't characterize those who make a choice I disagree with as too stupid, lazy or weak. And I'd say you are far more skilled than me in framing and manipulating the discussion to suit your point of view and perspective.
Actually, I never called anyone too stupid or lazy or weak. My point was that we had a full pilot vote. The only way you can call that non-democratic is if you believe that the pilots are too stupid or lazy or weak to make a rational decision. My assertion is that I have complete confidence in the pilots to decide their own fate. Once they vote, I accept the vote and move on. I don't try to make up conspiracy theories or excuses about why I lost the vote. In fact, my history shows that if I lose a vote I back the winner and provide any assistance possible. That is how you build a strong organization. If you try to rip it apart every time your personal desires are not satisfied then you are making us all weaker. It is not about you, it is about the group. Leadership is pitching in full force even when you don't get your way.

62%-38% or whatever the final number was, I forget now, that is a powerful democratic response that the pilots accepted this contract. If a candidate for President won by that margin it would be called a mandate from the people.
Old 07-18-2014 | 12:13 PM
  #163167  
TheManager's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
My question is this. How do we get rid of the long term bureaucrats? (Btw we had a lot of powerful behind the scenes guys at Nwalpa too) Each LEC has a election every (3?) years, so there is a way for the line pilot to affect turnover. How do we, the line pilots help in the cleansing/turnover of the committee positions?

It may be time for alpha, buzz and the gang to take a break and go fly. Whether any of us agree with their positions, we all should thank them for their time and wish them good luck.
Alpha, Buzz, et al, and the unelected, long term bureaucratic hanger ons, are basicly this:



Penguins! Birds with wings for no apparent reason. See, they are even sitting on their 92 hour FPL, plus allowance, on of course the highest equipment they can hold, nest eggs!

They're soooo cute.


In all seriousness now as I jest above, we have long time lifers in our union for two reasons.

Money. We are all motivated by it. Face it. They have just been collecting a disproportionate chunk over the many years.

Power. And with that ego. Some are desperately trying to measure up to the successes that others they are close to in life have achieved. They will cling to power in every attempt to try and attain that.

Kick one or two legs out from the stool and the paradigm is crushed.

Last edited by TheManager; 07-18-2014 at 12:32 PM.
Old 07-18-2014 | 12:16 PM
  #163168  
Hillbilly's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Sometimes it's more skunk then honey badger.
The Honey Skunk!!

It's like a badger......only stankier.
Old 07-18-2014 | 12:26 PM
  #163169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
You do realize UAL has higher hourly rates on some aircraft than we do today? I.e. 767-400.

And their rates will all exceed our 1/1/15 rates by 3% on 1/1/17 not 2018.
UAL 767-400 today $255 DAL $248

UAL A 320 today $205 DAL $203
Old 07-18-2014 | 12:32 PM
  #163170  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Default

That's somewhat unfair. Reality is they have stepped up out of selfless/ selfish reasons or both. Out of 12000 pilots, it is the same guys always involved and that says something about us too(Maybe we need to get off our asses and get involved some). Just some shifting of committees or to rep status. They have taken the time to get involved and stay involved and know the system well and how to use it to get what "they" believe "we" should get. I think some have been doing the business so long that they have a disdain for the average pilot and how dare anyone question their judgement.


Originally Posted by TheManager
Alpha, Buzz, et al, and the unelected, long term bureaucratic hanger ons, are basicly this:



Penguins! Birds with wings for no apparent reason. See, they are even sitting on their 92 hour FPL, plus allowance, on of course the highest equipment they can hold, nest eggs!

They're soooo cute.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices