Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

satchip 08-01-2014 11:31 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1697149)
Here is the part you're leaving out:

After careful evaluation, we made the decision to reduce trans-Atlantic growth plans for the fall and winter after seeing some weakness in the trans-Atlantic revenue environment due to too much industry capacity in the region. This change has resulted in a cascading effect for aircraft. A330 aircraft that would have been used for this growth on the trans-Atlantic will now be used for other trans-Atlantic routes being served by 777-200 and 767-300 aircraft.

Which further reinforces my (our) point. Measured by EASK we are not growing. 330<777. Getting further behind in the cure period that you and the MEC have been touting as the time the company would begin to be in balance. Not so much...

shiznit 08-01-2014 11:39 AM


Originally Posted by satchip (Post 1697151)
Which further reinforces my (our) point. Measured by EASK we are not growing. 330<777. Getting further behind in the cure period that you and the MEC have been touting as the time the company would begin to be in balance. Not so much...

We don't know how much EASKs the AF/KL side is going to be reducing, so don't assume the other side of the Atlantic is static.

Air France-KLM Lowers Earnings Guidance for 2014 - WSJ

remember we have a net availability of 6 more WB's now that all the mod lines are done... The A330's will not come online until the cure period is over.

There is leverage there, but like T says, how do you remedy the violation without "selling scope for pay"???

FrankCobretti 08-01-2014 11:45 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1697046)
Its easy bait to take though, on all sides of every issue. Which is why so many hooks are baited with it in the first place.

I feel sheepish this morning. I made my point. Then, I let someone get under my skin, got angry (internet angry is both the worst and silliest kind of angry), and loosed a rhetorical flourish that destroyed my credibility.

That's some rookie forensics, right there.

Check Essential 08-01-2014 11:45 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1697135)
I rarely agree with Carl but on one issue brought up I do agree. The bid should be rerun. Not sure contractually if we can require that but as a matter of courtesy and doing the right thing it should be rebid.

The MEC administration has apparently decided not to ask for that. The contract awareness bulletin says doing so would negatively affect more pilots than letting the bid stand.

Mem9guy 08-01-2014 12:14 PM

rebid
 
They should re-run the bid. The company likes to remind us to "bid what we want and want what we bid." We should be telling them to "post what you need, and need what you post."

If what happened did not violate the PWA in any way then we may need to work on the section that covers filling of vacancies.

PilotFrog 08-01-2014 12:25 PM

VA will pick up Atlantic flying. Not only are they cheaper per hour wise, they are cheaper manning wise, 2 vs 3 across most Atlantic trips.

Herkflyr 08-01-2014 12:28 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1697156)
There is leverage there, but like T says, how do you remedy the violation without "selling scope for pay"???

I don't know. What about some minimum category staffing level that would mirror what would have been required had the company not committed the violation? There would be a lot of guys collecting reserve guarantee for not working much, but that would have been the decision the company made when they violated the contract. Sort of like a staffing version of pay protection.

In fact we sort of have a very faint version of that with the Target Line Value (TLV). The TLV states that the average of the ALVs must range between 75-80 hours in any rolling 12 month period. The company would love to staff some categories at the high end of the ALV of 84 indefinitely (or conversely, some overmanned categories at 72 hours indefinitely).

Nevertheless, no matter how understaffed the category (M88B anyone?) they must eventually pull down the ALVs to meet the TLV requirement. That generates a lot of pairings that the company doesn't like, with lots of credit time. Oh well. The TLV is there not only to protect the pilots from the company who might otherwise schedule 84 hour ALVs forever, but in the long term it forces the company to plan ahead, and in fact saves them from themselves.

TenYearsGone 08-01-2014 12:32 PM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1697108)
Can't be done. Bigger pays more.... remember? Biggest be gone.

Respectfully as well...

It can be done. Better negotiations pay more, but we havent seen that yet.:D I would rather retire on the 737 and as far as pay banding, if it reduces our head count, I can't be "for" it even though I would rather retire NB.

TEN

gzsg 08-01-2014 12:39 PM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1697105)
Sure... complain and respond all you want if it makes you feel better. I want results. You want to puff out your chest. You can complain and respond all you want, but there still ain't a damn thing we can do about management decisions to buy or sell airplanes. You'll be laughed at, and nothing more.

But hey... whatever makes you feel like a big man "in charge" I guess....

They wouldnt laugh if we refused to grant relief on the upcoming.displacements.

Sadly we will lay down and surrender faster than the French.

Starcheck102 08-01-2014 12:39 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1697134)
Well, Obama is giving a news conference now. He's specifically shaming House Republicans into letting the Export Import Bank continue as it has. He says he doesn't understand why those House Republicans would be opposing the Export Import Bank when that bank does so much good for American jobs.

So glad ALPA national and the AFL-CIO fought so hard for Obama (twice) and fought so hard against republicans.

Back the PAC! :rolleyes:

Carl

That is simply false. ALPA never endorsed Obama, does not endorse presidential candidates (thank GOD), and he received no money from ALPA PAC.

I could give a rat about the AFL-CIO - they don't pay dues. You pay dues, so I hope you will check the facts on this for yourself.

This is just one of several occasions when Barry has tossed American pilots under the bus. The highlights include whatever devil's bargain he made with the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, and what he directed to happen at OMB during the endgame of FAR 117.

And now this. I must say his actions make it impossible to support him as an airline pilot. I have no confidence that he is actually on the side of organized labor.

You should retract your assertion. It is as false as it is offensive to the dozen-odd Delta pilots who work very hard on the Hill. The Pilot Partisan agenda is more than just a slogan to us, it represents the only way ALPA can stay relevant and avoid getting cornered in a very toxic political environment.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands