Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 08-02-2014 | 08:54 AM
  #164861  
Oberon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Here's the key point: IT WOULDN'T BE STOPPING COMMERECE. The company could decide at its sole discretion which routes they wanted to fly, and which they did not. Ending the JV would simply mean that Delta pilots would figure into management's equation on the commerece that management decides to pursue.

How you can say that doesn't help Delta pilots is beyond me.

Carl
Ending the JV is stopping commerce. That commerce may or may not be replaced by Delta airplanes flown by Delta pilots. Apparently, you think it will be replaced. I'm not as optimistic.

I think the point is moot since I don't think an arbitrator would end the JV and I'm certain Delta wouldn't willingly give it up. The company is presumably a few percentage points out of compliance. I doubt an arbitrator would be on board to grenade something that is already agreed to in principle over a small percentage. Again, the punishment doesn't fit the crime.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:04 AM
  #164862  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Even if you could get past the near impossibility of how you would realistically transition to your longevity based pay system, it ignores what I think would be a devastating impact on jobs. Specifically, it would incentivize the company to buy larger aircraft since we would have taken pay based on revenue production out of the equation. Further, it would make our smaller aircraft relatively more expensive to operate thus putting more pressure on outsourcing the bottom end. These two points add a compounding effect to job destruction.

With our current system, we are seeing a reduction in large aircraft which means pilots will be displaced to lower paying positions. I get that. But it's requiring more jobs. If I had to choose between higher pay for fewer jobs, or slightly lower pay for many more jobs...I choose the latter.

Carl
The transition would have to take place in steps obviously. Our pay has little to do with what airplanes the company buys. You need to get over that egotistical stance. They are going to buy whatever makes money for the enterprise. They aren't gonna buy a hundred 747-800s if you take a paycut.

And since it appears that you haven't been paying attention, where on earth do you think they are going to outsource bottom end flying to? Endeavor is losing 40 captains/month, and getting 3 replacements if they are lucky. Pay attention Carl.. Good grief.

The only thing you said in the entire missive above that I agree with it highlighted. Other than that...
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:13 AM
  #164863  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Which policies are you talking about?
Want to start with immigration, or education? Or perhaps we could discuss the thousands of pages of onerous regulation that this administration has foisted upon business in the name of "green" energy (for start). Sweeping back the ocean in terms of benefit that stuff is, and the only ones paying the price are the American taxpayer and workers. And the abysmal, poorly thought and hastily enacted "A"CA... Then there's the foreign policy debacles....

Decades to undo the damage.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:15 AM
  #164864  
contrails's Avatar
Line Holder
20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
Although I am a conservative, I dislike this man ^^^^^^ because he dislikes us. His son is an AA pilot (from what I have heard over the years) and they hate each other.

TEN
I know someone who flies with his son from time to time.

Let's just say it's TOTD every time.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:17 AM
  #164865  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
I saw this bumper sticker. I agree with it.

"If 10% is enough for GOD, 10% is enough for the IRS"

This is the solution for all of our problems. I even think 8% will do the trick..

TEN

Yup... Too bad it will never happen though... Too many scumbag lawyers would be out of work
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:36 AM
  #164866  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by casual observer
If we're getting rid of old 747's, the only sensible thing to do would be to replace them with new ones.


There is no money in 4 engined aircraft. Except for every foreign carrier under the sun. And United. And all the cargo oprators. But there's no money in cargo either.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:46 AM
  #164867  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Oberon
Which party do you think is more pilot friendly?
Actually the R's are the ones making noise about finally letting the facist "Bank of Boeing" die off. The D's are squealing bloody murder about Boeing jobs, because they believe everything comes from central planners and concentrated power at the highest levels.

The #denynai support we've been seeing so far is fairly bi-partisan.

The D's have done little to nothing to actually help pilot labor. The R's have at least pushed back for slightly reducing the rate of growth of government and graciously allowing us to keep a slightly bigger portion of the government property we temporarilly possess (our income).

Then there's ticket taxes and secret hidden fees. Both sides have been fairly quiet on that until recently.

To say R = anti pilot and D = pro pilot is an extreme stretch.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:51 AM
  #164868  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Since the number of flights is about 2.5 flights a day they have lacked to be in compliance it almost certainly would have to be handled under the grievance process. What we ask for in return is the issue. I don't think there is a real way to figure out damages on a individual basis. I would like to see us ask for a raise equal to the lost salary and a penalty of say 3% on top of that for all pilots to insure future compliance by the company. Probably be about a 3.25% raise.
I would also like to see the arbitrator attach a higher penalty via a additional raise if they do not come into compliance in the next 36 month cycle.
Note: not sure if the above is within the arbitration rules but I hope so.
We need the jobs not a 3% raise. And the last thing we should agree to is another 3 year blank check. They willingly, knowingly, flagrantly violated their own agreement and their own "rules of the road" by not honoring their deals. They just committed a huge act of bad faith, during the "cure period" they had no intention of ever honoring. That can't be rewarded with a 1 year COLA and another 3 year blank check.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:53 AM
  #164869  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Oberon
Are you worse off now than you were six years ago?
Were you worse off in 2007 than you were in 2001? The failed policies of central planning and trillion dollar stimulus fake economics he and his party are barfing into this economy will be devistating when they correct. Even during the upswing unemployment, underemployment and real GDP (not including government debt spending) are horrendous.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:58 AM
  #164870  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: No to large RJs
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Even if you could get past the near impossibility of how you would realistically transition to your longevity based pay system, it ignores what I think would be a devastating impact on jobs. Specifically, it would incentivize the company to buy larger aircraft since we would have taken pay based on revenue production out of the equation. Further, it would make our smaller aircraft relatively more expensive to operate thus putting more pressure on outsourcing the bottom end. These two points add a compounding effect to job destruction.

With our current system, we are seeing a reduction in large aircraft which means pilots will be displaced to lower paying positions. I get that. But it's requiring more jobs. If I had to choose between higher pay for fewer jobs, or slightly lower pay for many more jobs...I choose the latter.

Carl
+1

LBP=more stagnation and less jobs = huge concession! I'm all for movement which the company is obviously very opposed. Every move since our merger has limited true progression either from increased production requiring less pilots or JV agreements sacrificing premium flying, requiring less pilots. The reason this LBP keeps coming up is it's next on the agenda! The company is after one thing….fewer of us as possible!! I expect to hear the drum beat of benefits of LBP very soon from our very own association.

I encourage all to shoot this down just like the CDOs. It will come in charts and fancy stats etc…But it's arrival will mean more of the same, stagnation and less jobs overall.

T will argue the company will buy whatever they want regardless of pilot pay. I don't think the billions of RJs purchased support your claim. Our pay structure is not a small factor in what they purchase.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices