Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Here's the key point: IT WOULDN'T BE STOPPING COMMERECE. The company could decide at its sole discretion which routes they wanted to fly, and which they did not. Ending the JV would simply mean that Delta pilots would figure into management's equation on the commerece that management decides to pursue.
How you can say that doesn't help Delta pilots is beyond me.
Carl
How you can say that doesn't help Delta pilots is beyond me.
Carl
I think the point is moot since I don't think an arbitrator would end the JV and I'm certain Delta wouldn't willingly give it up. The company is presumably a few percentage points out of compliance. I doubt an arbitrator would be on board to grenade something that is already agreed to in principle over a small percentage. Again, the punishment doesn't fit the crime.
Even if you could get past the near impossibility of how you would realistically transition to your longevity based pay system, it ignores what I think would be a devastating impact on jobs. Specifically, it would incentivize the company to buy larger aircraft since we would have taken pay based on revenue production out of the equation. Further, it would make our smaller aircraft relatively more expensive to operate thus putting more pressure on outsourcing the bottom end. These two points add a compounding effect to job destruction.
With our current system, we are seeing a reduction in large aircraft which means pilots will be displaced to lower paying positions. I get that. But it's requiring more jobs. If I had to choose between higher pay for fewer jobs, or slightly lower pay for many more jobs...I choose the latter.
Carl
With our current system, we are seeing a reduction in large aircraft which means pilots will be displaced to lower paying positions. I get that. But it's requiring more jobs. If I had to choose between higher pay for fewer jobs, or slightly lower pay for many more jobs...I choose the latter.
Carl
And since it appears that you haven't been paying attention, where on earth do you think they are going to outsource bottom end flying to? Endeavor is losing 40 captains/month, and getting 3 replacements if they are lucky. Pay attention Carl.. Good grief.
The only thing you said in the entire missive above that I agree with it highlighted. Other than that...
Want to start with immigration, or education? Or perhaps we could discuss the thousands of pages of onerous regulation that this administration has foisted upon business in the name of "green" energy (for start). Sweeping back the ocean in terms of benefit that stuff is, and the only ones paying the price are the American taxpayer and workers. And the abysmal, poorly thought and hastily enacted "A"CA... Then there's the foreign policy debacles....
Decades to undo the damage.
Decades to undo the damage.
Let's just say it's TOTD every time.
Yup... Too bad it will never happen though... Too many scumbag lawyers would be out of work
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
There is no money in 4 engined aircraft. Except for every foreign carrier under the sun. And United. And all the cargo oprators. But there's no money in cargo either.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Actually the R's are the ones making noise about finally letting the facist "Bank of Boeing" die off. The D's are squealing bloody murder about Boeing jobs, because they believe everything comes from central planners and concentrated power at the highest levels.
The #denynai support we've been seeing so far is fairly bi-partisan.
The D's have done little to nothing to actually help pilot labor. The R's have at least pushed back for slightly reducing the rate of growth of government and graciously allowing us to keep a slightly bigger portion of the government property we temporarilly possess (our income).
Then there's ticket taxes and secret hidden fees. Both sides have been fairly quiet on that until recently.
To say R = anti pilot and D = pro pilot is an extreme stretch.
The #denynai support we've been seeing so far is fairly bi-partisan.
The D's have done little to nothing to actually help pilot labor. The R's have at least pushed back for slightly reducing the rate of growth of government and graciously allowing us to keep a slightly bigger portion of the government property we temporarilly possess (our income).
Then there's ticket taxes and secret hidden fees. Both sides have been fairly quiet on that until recently.
To say R = anti pilot and D = pro pilot is an extreme stretch.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Since the number of flights is about 2.5 flights a day they have lacked to be in compliance it almost certainly would have to be handled under the grievance process. What we ask for in return is the issue. I don't think there is a real way to figure out damages on a individual basis. I would like to see us ask for a raise equal to the lost salary and a penalty of say 3% on top of that for all pilots to insure future compliance by the company. Probably be about a 3.25% raise.
I would also like to see the arbitrator attach a higher penalty via a additional raise if they do not come into compliance in the next 36 month cycle.
Note: not sure if the above is within the arbitration rules but I hope so.
I would also like to see the arbitrator attach a higher penalty via a additional raise if they do not come into compliance in the next 36 month cycle.
Note: not sure if the above is within the arbitration rules but I hope so.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Were you worse off in 2007 than you were in 2001? The failed policies of central planning and trillion dollar stimulus fake economics he and his party are barfing into this economy will be devistating when they correct. Even during the upswing unemployment, underemployment and real GDP (not including government debt spending) are horrendous.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: No to large RJs
Even if you could get past the near impossibility of how you would realistically transition to your longevity based pay system, it ignores what I think would be a devastating impact on jobs. Specifically, it would incentivize the company to buy larger aircraft since we would have taken pay based on revenue production out of the equation. Further, it would make our smaller aircraft relatively more expensive to operate thus putting more pressure on outsourcing the bottom end. These two points add a compounding effect to job destruction.
With our current system, we are seeing a reduction in large aircraft which means pilots will be displaced to lower paying positions. I get that. But it's requiring more jobs. If I had to choose between higher pay for fewer jobs, or slightly lower pay for many more jobs...I choose the latter.
Carl
With our current system, we are seeing a reduction in large aircraft which means pilots will be displaced to lower paying positions. I get that. But it's requiring more jobs. If I had to choose between higher pay for fewer jobs, or slightly lower pay for many more jobs...I choose the latter.
Carl
LBP=more stagnation and less jobs = huge concession! I'm all for movement which the company is obviously very opposed. Every move since our merger has limited true progression either from increased production requiring less pilots or JV agreements sacrificing premium flying, requiring less pilots. The reason this LBP keeps coming up is it's next on the agenda! The company is after one thing….fewer of us as possible!! I expect to hear the drum beat of benefits of LBP very soon from our very own association.
I encourage all to shoot this down just like the CDOs. It will come in charts and fancy stats etc…But it's arrival will mean more of the same, stagnation and less jobs overall.
T will argue the company will buy whatever they want regardless of pilot pay. I don't think the billions of RJs purchased support your claim. Our pay structure is not a small factor in what they purchase.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





