Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
[QUOTE=gloopy;1706580]Just to clarify, you do not necessarily go on long call at 0000. That is only the case if you haven't gotten anything by 3pm. Regardless of if you checked or not, you can still have a legal 1000 trip or short call, as long as they did put it on your sched by 1500 the day before.
The assumption is if you don't check it from 1500-2359, fine, but you need to check it by 0000. Of course we no longer have to notify of anything, which was a massive concession IMO. Its unprecedented that we are considered notified now upon first voicemail attempted contact. That was an earth shattering giveaway that will remain forever, long after the higher duty period average goes away during the next crisis or whatever.
Gloopy,
I understand and agree with being both critical and skeptical of management, but if you think that they will be able to take away contractual provisions "during the next crisis ..." what difference does anything make?
We can apply that logic to any item in our contract that we value - payrates, duty rigs etc.
I have been screwed as bad as most of my peers here at DAL by the former corrupt management team. The same team that mostly took retention bonuses and left anyway, the same team that tried to secretly negotiate BK proof pensions while at the same time going after employee pensions. I can go on, but you get the idea.
I will forever remain highly skeptical of anything management "says" but once it is "contractual" we have to proceed on the assumption that either they will honor the contract or we (DALPA) will pursue all possibly legal remedies.
Many will argue that DALPA does not do this, and that is a valid discussion to have, but a separate issue.
Scoop
The assumption is if you don't check it from 1500-2359, fine, but you need to check it by 0000. Of course we no longer have to notify of anything, which was a massive concession IMO. Its unprecedented that we are considered notified now upon first voicemail attempted contact. That was an earth shattering giveaway that will remain forever, long after the higher duty period average goes away during the next crisis or whatever.
Gloopy,
I understand and agree with being both critical and skeptical of management, but if you think that they will be able to take away contractual provisions "during the next crisis ..." what difference does anything make?
We can apply that logic to any item in our contract that we value - payrates, duty rigs etc.
I have been screwed as bad as most of my peers here at DAL by the former corrupt management team. The same team that mostly took retention bonuses and left anyway, the same team that tried to secretly negotiate BK proof pensions while at the same time going after employee pensions. I can go on, but you get the idea.
I will forever remain highly skeptical of anything management "says" but once it is "contractual" we have to proceed on the assumption that either they will honor the contract or we (DALPA) will pursue all possibly legal remedies.
Many will argue that DALPA does not do this, and that is a valid discussion to have, but a separate issue.
Scoop
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Didn't we go to "self notification" with the new LOA? They will just put it on your schedule and it is up to you to check and ACK the trip. If you cannot report fit for duty then you have to call and let them know. When I'm on LC, I now check about every 9 hours or so (takes me 3 to get to the airport) and ACK anything that is there. I could be doing it all wrong though....
I have, a couple times, had CS put a trip on my line that I noticed and shortly afterward was gone. I think what happened in my case was that I checked as they were "testing" it on my schedule. Apparently that's the only way they have to see if you're legal for the trip. Or maybe someone called them and said "hey I'm senior to that guy, why didn't I get it?"
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Yes, but as soon as they take delivery of such aircraft, they can no longer operate as a DCI carrier, with the exception of Republic.
The remedy for scope non compliance is the written financial penalties in the contract(which there are none), or in certain circumstances, a merger with SLI.
The remedy for scope non compliance is the written financial penalties in the contract(which there are none), or in certain circumstances, a merger with SLI.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Yes, but as soon as they take delivery of such aircraft, they can no longer operate as a DCI carrier, with the exception of Republic.
The remedy for scope non compliance is the written financial penalties in the contract(which there are none), or in certain circumstances, a merger with SLI.
The remedy for scope non compliance is the written financial penalties in the contract(which there are none), or in certain circumstances, a merger with SLI.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
The notification requirement post FAR117 was as close as we've come (and possibly ever will again) to having "the hammer" in negotiations. We sold it, just like we did last time. We will never get either back, obviously. The magitude of that might not be apparent for a while, but if we ever take another "haircut" again, we will lose the things we got and never get back what we had.
As for "what difference does it make?" I'd say this is at least a highly "teachable moment" of what we need to stop doing. We've got to stop paying for our own raises.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
But doesn't your point about them having already ordered the aircraft and those implications work against them with DL already operating aircraft that size in the form of the 717? They have already set a precedent for 100+ seat airframes being flown on the mainline certificate.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





