1. I'd be surprised if they weren't anti-DPA writings. The content doesn't change whether there was criminal hacking or not.

2. Insider or not, if there was criminal hacking they were wrong to do that. If there wasn't criminal hacking it is irrelevant.

3. No.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

If you recall, Mr. Private Writings never admitted that his "private writings and thoughts of a personal nature" WERE the actual Anti-DPA rhetoric that mysteriously and coincidentally ended up on the DPA website. Why is that? Why the cryptic "explanation"? It's because the truth would've sounded really bad. I think you're right though, the "private writings" were the anti-DPA rant.

If this indeed was the content, then I believe that fact would be very relevant as to intent.

What potentially makes this a big deal is if this was done by an ALPA insider, i.e. an elected or appointed official. Big difference if it was just a disgruntled line pilot versus a union "leader." And the fact that ALPA attorneys have worked so hard to prevent his identity from being known says to me that it IS a high level ALPA operative. Time will tell.

 

Your comments are a replay of why O. J. Simpson was supposedly innocent.

Stop with your complete disregard for the truth.

This pilot hacked the DPA website and posted negative communication.

He got caught immediately.

He called Tim Caplinger 3 separate times and offered him money to let it go.

Tim asked him to simply admit in writing what he did and who helped him and he would forgive and forget.

The pilot refused. Why? IMO it was because it would have made DALPA look bad, but that is only my opinion.

Honor is something no man can give you and something no man can take away.

Defending this action and pretending it was an accident is dishonorable and disgusting. You insult all of us with your comments.

THE GLOVE DOESN'T FIT!!!!!!!

Jerry

 

The whole key to this kerfuffle is the identity of the hacker.

Is he now or has he ever been a "DALPA guy"?

If the answer is yes --- heads need to roll.

 

May one ask why TC has yet to release the evidence of hacking requested by the judge in his lawsuit?

 

His point (and mine) was to answer Check Essential, who stated that, if ALPA had nothing to do with this, they should say so.

Please try to keep up.

 

I respectfully disagree. By stating that the profit sharing for 2014 and 2015 are not yet known, and by adding a footnote to the 10% stating that it is an estimate, they are treating it as a conservative guess as to what may happen.

The reader (me, in this case) was left to draw his own conclusions as to the likelihood of the estimate and the desirability of placing this amount of my compensation at risk. Hopefully, the survey will give me an opportunity to express my views on that subject. If not, I will let my rep know how I feel on the subject.

Agreed. Keep in mind that the document we've been discussing is the Contract History, which showed the history (duh) of our two airline pilot contracts over the past 20 years or so. I recently received the Contract Comparison (I assume we all did) that provides the comparison with our peers.

 

Has any candidate for ALPA president sent such campaign letters to all ALPA pilots in the past? I'm not suggesting this to be right or wrong, only that it seems a bit unusual, unless I've just not been paying enough attention during past presidential campaigns.

Too much time on Denny's balcony, I guess.

 

It is a race, TC's supporters demand the head of a DALPA Guy before anyone publishes the fact that the DPA simply failed to administer their web site properly and in fact, nothing happened other than he DPA gave someone else the keys to their car and the someone else thought it would be funny to move it to another spot.

Meanwhile, our scope still isn't being complied with.

I give nearly zero ducks what happened to the DPA stupid web site. I care that we're not staffing 15 transatlantic flights per day on widebody equipment. I support those working to improve our contract.

 

I think it's quite clear that removing DPA folks from ALPA membership has always been your goal Bar. So go right ahead and put forth such a resolution. If it passes, I won't pay a dime of dues to ALPA. Neither will the other 5,000 DPA guys. We'll all call your bluff to see if you'll push the company to terminate all of us.

When the company does not pursue termination, I'll look for the letter from ALPA urging us to rejoin ALPA for the sake of unity. Maybe they can get you to write the letter.

Look forward to your resolution Bar.

Carl