Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Yeah but he will be in with the really cool crowd in the NFL... You know... Ryan Leaf... Jamarcus Russell... Manziel... those guys
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
I don't really understand what he was doing on the sidelines in the first place. He was suspended. If he wanted to go to the game, he should have bought a ticket like the rest of the student body.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
While I'm on my soapbox, why did ABC feel the need to put a camera on him during the game? He should have been persona non grata. He hasn't learned a damned thing.
Rant over.
Rant over.
The fact is that both suffer from selection bias. Neither is a true statistical example- only Wilson Polling would be able to get that. I'd be willing to bet that an extremely high % that participated in the DPA one participated in the DALPA one.
Trying to insinuate that one is more scientifically valid than the other like Reroute did is incorrect and shows a poor understanding of statistics. I'm sure the DALPA one will have more participants than the DPA one, therefore giving a slightly better cross section and reducing some of the selection bias, but neither is truly scientifically valid unless one of them miraculously reaches 100% participation.
Trying to insinuate that one is more scientifically valid than the other like Reroute did is incorrect and shows a poor understanding of statistics. I'm sure the DALPA one will have more participants than the DPA one, therefore giving a slightly better cross section and reducing some of the selection bias, but neither is truly scientifically valid unless one of them miraculously reaches 100% participation.
Our system is set up so those who actually attend meetings and propose resolutions are heard the loudest. Sometimes that leads to a vocal minority driving the agenda. As good as technology is now I think we could do more to make participating easier. In my opinion more people involved means a better system.
That said, if you are reading this you have probably already taken the survey so I'm not going to say take the survey. Instead you should tell everyone you run into to take the survey. I'm talking about the ALPA survey since they actually represent us.
Well a few weeks ago we had a government affairs guy ride in the back from DCA. He stopped up to say hey and we asked him what the biggest issue for Delta was right now. He said if we can't get Japan to let us move our entire NRT operation to HND and get good slots (I guess we have slots that are almost impossible to make work) then we will shut down the whole operation in Japan and over fly everything. We asked him how likely that was and he said, "Didn't we just announce that we were parking 4 747's" and gave us that look.
Well a few weeks ago we had a government affairs guy ride in the back from DCA. He stopped up to say hey and we asked him what the biggest issue for Delta was right now. He said if we can't get Japan to let us move our entire NRT operation to HND and get good slots (I guess we have slots that are almost impossible to make work) then we will shut down the whole operation in Japan and over fly everything. We asked him how likely that was and he said, "Didn't we just announce that we were parking 4 747's" and gave us that look.
The two surveys in question aren't necessarily trying to be statistically acurate. A more accurate description of them is "politically accurate". An elected official doesn't care about the opinion of someone who doesn't participate in the political process. I suspect there is a roll for Wilson polling which is statistically accurate but it is simply a data point to determine where there may be a divergence from what the politically active think and what the general population thinks.
Our system is set up so those who actually attend meetings and propose resolutions are heard the loudest. Sometimes that leads to a vocal minority driving the agenda. As good as technology is now I think we could do more to make participating easier. In my opinion more people involved means a better system.
That said, if you are reading this you have probably already taken the survey so I'm not going to say take the survey. Instead you should tell everyone you run into to take the survey. I'm talking about the ALPA survey since they actually represent us.
Our system is set up so those who actually attend meetings and propose resolutions are heard the loudest. Sometimes that leads to a vocal minority driving the agenda. As good as technology is now I think we could do more to make participating easier. In my opinion more people involved means a better system.
That said, if you are reading this you have probably already taken the survey so I'm not going to say take the survey. Instead you should tell everyone you run into to take the survey. I'm talking about the ALPA survey since they actually represent us.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
That is my experience as well. Three pilots I work with in the reserves did not even know about the survey nor did they seem inclined to fill out.
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Now, ask yourself why that is...
I've got several theories, probably a combination of two.
1. some are lazy.
2. some are so p/o'd after 4-8-3-3, they figure it's a waste of their time.
The MEC is going to do what ever they want, (CDO anyone? Reduced profit sharing anyone?) and feel that the survey is just a ruse to appease the angry mob.
My last trip both Capts were working on it, neither F/O was...
I've got several theories, probably a combination of two.
1. some are lazy.
2. some are so p/o'd after 4-8-3-3, they figure it's a waste of their time.
The MEC is going to do what ever they want, (CDO anyone? Reduced profit sharing anyone?) and feel that the survey is just a ruse to appease the angry mob.
My last trip both Capts were working on it, neither F/O was...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




