![]() |
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1746536)
-left 2500 757 block hours unused in JUL and Aug due to crew shortage. Not enough notice from marketing.
-would like 777 temporary bases to reduce credit. RFP, it was asked that comments stay off the forums however decision should be released 4 to 5 days after BOD meeting. The real question is will the net result be block hour and widebody seat positive? Of course they are getting some. No one disputes that. But will they be fewer large wide bodies flying to CDG/AMS/LHR in a plan that requires fewer DL pilots, or will be it DL widebody pilot growth? Bigger planes are great, but ONLY if they bring an equal or greater number of jobs to the table. That is the big question WRT this and any other so called widebody RFP. |
2015 Health Plan Evaluator is online.
You need to find the tiny "More Plan Options" right below the "print this page" button to see the DPMP numbers. I'm sure that's just a coincidence. :rolleyes: |
Hearing the American new pilot deal is our pay rates plus 5%. No other details. Hopefully some more DC, vacation and higher value of vacation/training day.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1746830)
Hearing the American new pilot deal is our pay rates plus 5%. No other details. Hopefully some more DC, vacation and higher value of vacation/training day.
|
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1746811)
Hey guys
I'm putting my 15-year old daughter on a flight to MSP tomorrow. I'll be taking her to the gate, of course, but on the return flight....does she need some form of ID to get thru TSA? She's non-revving. Thanks in advance, Buzz |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 1746839)
No, but it is a good idea to have a passport on her in case the airline screws up. Like when we put a UM on a flight to FCO instead of MCO.
Thanks guys! Much appreciated. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1746830)
Hearing the American new pilot deal is our pay rates plus 5%. No other details. Hopefully some more DC, vacation and higher value of vacation/training day.
I'm far more concerned with what some may expect us to have to "give up" to get whatever we end up seeing in any TA. If AA exceeded our pay by 5% and did it with a higher B fund percentage, higher vacation and other credits, and didn't sell scope to get anything, we should be able to pattern bargain significantly higher in all areas than where we are now without "paying for it" ourselves. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1746841)
If that's true, we're set up for significant gains IMO. Just getting the insane old Airways pay rates off the table, much less replaced with something higher than we have now, sets us up for significantly more than 4/8/3/3.
I'm far more concerned with what some may expect us to have to "give up" to get whatever we end up seeing in any TA. If AA exceeded our pay by 5% and did it with a higher B fund percentage, higher vacation and other credits, and didn't sell scope to get anything, we should be able to pattern bargain significantly higher in all areas than where we are now without "paying for it" ourselves. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1746762)
I know you didn't.
Just adding a perspective to the public policy dilemma. If we make it "illegal" then some will follow the path of undocumented aliens and hide, which makes it much more difficult to find and quarantine suspected cases. |
Originally Posted by EdGrimley
(Post 1746795)
Just so I am reading you correctly, the net increase of 73 airframes will be 717's, 737's and a couple A330's while parking airframes from the 7ER and 747 categories? When you say the fleet will go from 559 to 667 in 2015 are you counting airframes (717's/737's) that have already arrived or from point in time now to 2015?
Do you see any growth in Delta pilot/ Delta metal international flying going into 2015 or more code share (ie we don't take ownership of our flying and are international ticket brokers) nonsense? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands