![]() |
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1759430)
Here she comes!
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/B1vpKauCQAAsNVN.jpg http://pbs.twimg.com/media/B1vpKbfCMAEGszv.jpg |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1759548)
Remember, the reps are flying the line. Just like last time, it is the admin insiders who make the concessions.
In C2012 the MEC never authorized or discussed reducing profit sharing. O'Malley agreed to it without MEC knowledge and it was jammed down their throats. Same plan this time. The administration and the semi-permanent insiders wrote the contract. The reps got played like a violin. Whether they will let that happen again in 2015 is an open question. |
A good friend of mine who travels a lot just flew Seattle to Las Vegas. He had a good ride down on a 737 but flew a CRJ700 back. He was very uncomfortable and not happy with the CRJ and will make sure he avoids RJ's at all costs in the future.
Denny |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1759642)
Ahhhh...a decade is a long time. It will stay low this year then be right back up. Most of the industry thinks a long term (decade) average will be right around 90/bbl.
Speculators are a big one though, they were probably responsible for most of the past run up, so hopefully that is the past. Usually, bubbles take a decade or more to re inflate, so we got that going for us, which is nice. |
newest flight ops update: SEA 73N base
Anyone have any speculation on how a 73 base in Seattle will effect movement westward?
|
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 1759685)
Anyone have any speculation on how a 73 base in Seattle will effect movement westward?
Our western based pilots have been traditionally more senior because we don't really have an entry-level airplane out west, coupled with the fact that the vast majority of our pilot positions are based east of SLC. The 73 in LA is the closest thing, but it's so small that it's still very senior (ie not enough slots to trickle way down the list.) More/new narrowbody spots on the west coast is a good thing for anyone wanting to be based out there. |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1759671)
...that's clearly what happened with C2012. The administration and the semi-permanent insiders wrote the contract. The reps got played like a violin.
Saying that the MEC played no role larger than that of a stringed orchestral instrument during that time is very different from what I've heard. |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1759642)
Ahhhh...a decade is a long time. It will stay low this year then be right back up. Most of the industry thinks a long term (decade) average will be right around 90/bbl.
There are so many variables that go into oil that I really think nobody knows what it will do. If it was just a true supply vs. demand issue then it would be fairly easy, but with OPEC and speculators in the market.....I don't think anyone really knows what it will do more than 6 months out. |
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 1759685)
Anyone have any speculation on how a 73 base in Seattle will effect movement westward?
Longer answer: There are a lot of fairly senior FO's on both the A330 and 75/767 based in Seattle that will try and bid captain on it. And I won't leave out SLC and LAX guys either. For that matter, I'm sure there are guide a few guys that commute out of Seattle to the 737 in both LAX and SLC. Establishing any base out west will have a positive effect. Denny |
Hey Clamp, your boy is in the news again:
Website Alleges Jameis Winston Shaved Points in First Half of Louisville Game | FOX Sports |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:40 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands