![]() |
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1788432)
I'm hearing that the company wants mandatory upgrades like AA used to have. The apparent reason is they don't want new hires going quickly to the left seat.
It's all about the Benjamins. All problems are solved by pay rates. I am also strongly against this. In my opinion one of the biggest benefits of this job is the many different options we have that affect QOL. Some guys will chase the quick upgrade, others will want to stay in the top 10% of thier category, some like to bid reserve and maximize time at home. Others like to stay senior as WB FOs. All these options are highly valued by those who pursue them. A lot of really senior FOs are simply exercising their seniority rights by staying WB FO. This not only benefits them, but also benefits the more junior guys that chase the quick upgrade. Most importantly, any forced upgrades are a very strong diminution of our current seniority rights. :mad: I don't even see how this could be costed out. What cost do you attribute to the senior WB FO who used to bid what he wants, gets GS's, and has holidays off when he would be forced to upgrade to NB CA, be junior on reserve, and fly holidays? Scoop |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1788528)
I am also strongly against this. In my opinion one of the biggest benefits of this job is the many different options we have that affect QOL. Some guys will chase the quick upgrade, others will want to stay in the top 10% of thier category, some like to bid reserve and maximize time at home. Others like to stay senior as WB FOs. All these options are highly valued by those who pursue them.
A lot of really senior FOs are simply exercising their seniority rights by staying WB FO. This not only benefits them, but also benefits the more junior guys that chase the quick upgrade. Most importantly, any forced upgrades are a very strong diminution of our current seniority rights. :mad: Scoop |
Probably a stupid question here...I'm flying Christmas eve and Christmas and my layovers are lame. Probably nothing around the hotels will be open so I'm wanting to pack a couple cans of Surly Furious beers in my bag so I can have a some Christmas cheer in my hotel room. Am I allowed to go through KCM (I realize they would never know) or regular TSA with the cans?
|
Originally Posted by Ed Harley
(Post 1788537)
Probably a stupid question here...I'm flying Christmas eve and Christmas and my layovers are lame. Probably nothing around the hotels will be open so I'm wanting to pack a couple cans of Surly Furious beers in my bag so I can have a some Christmas cheer in my hotel room. Am I allowed to go through KCM (I realize they would never know) or regular TSA with the cans?
|
Originally Posted by Ed Harley
(Post 1788537)
Probably a stupid question here...I'm flying Christmas eve and Christmas and my layovers are lame. Probably nothing around the hotels will be open so I'm wanting to pack a couple cans of Surly Furious beers in my bag so I can have a some Christmas cheer in my hotel room. Am I allowed to go through KCM (I realize they would never know) or regular TSA with the cans?
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1788432)
I'm hearing that the company wants mandatory upgrades like AA used to have. The apparent reason is they don't want new hires going quickly to the left seat.
It's all about the Benjamins. All problems are solved by pay rates. |
Originally Posted by Herkflyr
(Post 1788406)
First sentence is true. Second sentence not true. You can still drop stuff Jan-Mar using PB days; it just takes a bit more legwork to get it done. From the Scheduling Reference Handbook:
Q: What happens to my payback days if they are not used in the current year? A: If the days have not been used prior to January 1, they will automatically be converted to supplemental (SUPP) vacation days to be used in the subsequent vacation year. If you wish to use the days in January, February, or March, you may enter a request for a personal drop, and then contact a Crew Scheduling supervisor to have the days of the personal drop converted to payback days, if desired. Those PB days are worth way more to drop stuff than to use as vacation days. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1788605)
They are also coming hard for minimum schedule.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1788362)
Bingo.
From what I am hearing, and this is just my personal take, but I have formulated it from talking to my CP, DALPA Reps, and management briefings -The Top three management "Wants" in the next contract: 1. Increased Pilot Productivity 2. Tighten up sick leave 3. Increased duration of seat-locks If any of these items interest you, I suggest you start calling/e-mailing your reps and let them how you feel. Scoop How would we increase productivity currently? Mind you, lots of productivity is lost to training inefficiencies that are generated by a diverse fleet of many different types. Not our problem as pilots to fix. Skip longer seat locks, adopt UPS pay scales plus automatic cost of living adjustment per contract year with intact profit sharing. Done deal? Just observations and thoughts. |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1788614)
How exactly would they " tighten " sick leave more than it is?
We should have double the sick time everyone else has.....we can't just pop a Tylenol Cold and show up to work. Take a hit of Nyquil to get some sleep when you have a cold and you are not suppose to show up to work for 60 hours. Anyone read the report on the USair accident from last year? Captain is getting hung because he took a medication that required 60 hours free of duty and he only had 45. You don't want to have an incident and have them find an OTC medication in your system. They would be smart if they just figured we would all use 200 hours of sick time per year and forget about policing the policy. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands