![]() |
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1696130)
Early retirement program
|
If RA wants relief, he needs to compensate everyone. Not just 747 captains with a pension.
True dat. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1695969)
We might as well get used to it, we're going to be living with those words for a long long long time. :) |
Originally Posted by Clowns on Fire
(Post 1696123)
3bil, you seem to be posting more since Purple Drank was banned. Keep up the good work.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1696158)
Really Drank? It's pretty obvious who you are. :rolleyes: Welcome back anyway... I guess.
No sense hiding. Smart guys (and you) were bound to figure it out. :D |
Who's Purple Drank? : )
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1695912)
Specifically, in October 2000 when the Delta MEC excluded the ASA and Comair pilots' attempt at finding a single carrier status with Delta.
There can never, ever, be any step toward "unity" with regional airlines that give even a theoretical chance at arbitration or anything greater than a staple. Ironically, under almost every scenario, even a pre-agreed upon staple gives them that chance because once you're in you're in and can then sue for more. The solution needs to be 100% from the mainline side to recapture at the bottom end at this point. Even PCL wend behind our backs and negotiated directly with DL management for DAL scope and hiring preferences up to and including top secret "vault letters" and that can not be rewarded or treated as leverage. We need to reduce large RJ's at regionals bring that lift here unilaterally at this point. We have already given a lot to DCI that has no leverage and is imploding as it is. I'm in favor of hiring an equivalent number of pilots to the large RJ's we re-insource, but we're basically doing that anyway. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1696147)
It ain't a Delta airplane until it's sitting on the ramp with a widget on the tail. It ain't a Delta job until there is a bid saying so. You and I aren't gonna live long enough to see 330A, my friend. And Ill betcha the 74 guys won't leave until they turn 65....
At least reserve is better than is used to be. There are worse things than flying back and forth to islands in the Caribbean. |
So reading between the lines on the update, the 333IGWs are the 744 replacement. No mention of sailing's ever talked about delivery delay on them.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1696138)
Naive statement of the day. Our scope has nothing to do with what airplanes they buy in the big scheme of things going forward.
If the RJs had not been allowed to fly via scope than DC9 sized aircraft would have had to be ordered at some point. If we did not allow so many of our passengers to be flown on other airlines it would change the needs for what airplanes were ordered. The JVs are taking jobs on the high end and we allow it via scope. We need better language and we need to strongly enforce it. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands