|
|
No Big Ben.
|
Timbo,
Hot Russian Girls, for me. GF |
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 1795330)
Timbo,
Hot Russian Girls, for me. GF |
I'm getting cars I can't afford and job offers as a captain qualified FO at Trans States.
I need to up my googling to improve my ad experience, apparently! |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1795357)
I'm getting cars I can't afford and job offers as a captain qualified FO at Trans States.
I need to up my googling to improve my ad experience, apparently! |
Surprised that no one else has commented, given Delta's unique position as the last airline in the free world continuing the effort to redesign, fix, or come up with a work around to operate Douglas equipment. Apparently we have competition!
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...v7qotf7p1x.jpg The Chinese used Douglas old trunkliner tooling and built a DC-9-10, or is this a -32, or is it a MD95-ne717-CRJ900? After replacing the wing, avionics, brakes, engines and who knows what else they have created a performance limited airplane that carries fewer people than a CRJ and weighs 25,000lbs more with half the range. I wish them luck. It isn't easy fixing Douglas stuff. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1795396)
Surprised that no one else has commented, given Delta's unique position as the last airline in the free world continuing the effort to redesign, fix, or come up with a work around to operate Douglas equipment. Apparently we have competition!
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...v7qotf7p1x.jpg The Chinese used Douglas old trunkliner tooling and built a DC-9-10, or is this a -32, or is it a MD95-ne717-CRJ900? After replacing the wing, avionics, brakes, engines and who knows what else they have created a performance limited airplane that carries fewer people than a CRJ and weighs 25,000lbs more with half the range. I wish them luck. It isn't easy fixing Douglas stuff. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1795396)
Surprised that no one else has commented, given Delta's unique position as the last airline in the free world continuing the effort to redesign, fix, or come up with a work around to operate Douglas equipment. Apparently we have competition!
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...v7qotf7p1x.jpg The Chinese used Douglas old trunkliner tooling and built a DC-9-10, or is this a -32, or is it a MD95-ne717-CRJ900? After replacing the wing, avionics, brakes, engines and who knows what else they have created a performance limited airplane that carries fewer people than a CRJ and weighs 25,000lbs more with half the range. I wish them luck. It isn't easy fixing Douglas stuff. That is a frankenplane for sure... It's a stumpy DC-9 fuselage with a russian wing with ERJ-190 motors. Avionics I assume are North Korean rip offs of russian ripoffs of 1970's general dynamics stuff. I wonder if a slightly tweaked microsoft paperclip helper pops up when something breaks? |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1795357)
I'm getting cars I can't afford and job offers as a captain qualified FO at Trans States.
I need to up my googling to improve my ad experience, apparently! |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1795396)
Surprised that no one else has commented, given Delta's unique position as the last airline in the free world continuing the effort to redesign, fix, or come up with a work around to operate Douglas equipment. Apparently we have competition!
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...v7qotf7p1x.jpg The Chinese used Douglas old trunkliner tooling and built a DC-9-10, or is this a -32, or is it a MD95-ne717-CRJ900? After replacing the wing, avionics, brakes, engines and who knows what else they have created a performance limited airplane that carries fewer people than a CRJ and weighs 25,000lbs more with half the range. I wish them luck. It isn't easy fixing Douglas stuff. Seeing that the dc-9 will continue indefinitely makes me excited in places. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:43 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands