![]() |
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1820355)
It's already been reduced once. If profit sharing is anything like scope, it will get worse and worse each contract.
|
Originally Posted by Elliot
(Post 1820263)
This incident, near fatal accident happened operating out of a small airport near Superior, WI. A friend I work with is familiar with these clowns :mad:, and they have had MANY other close calls. (This time they weren't so lucky, or were lucky that nobody was injured/killed.)
P.S. One of these times, these hooligans are actually going to succeed at hurting someone, either in the air or on the ground. |
Originally Posted by DeadHead
(Post 1820378)
Been trying to make this point for a while. We put our blind trust in the contract survey and then are dismissed from providing any input to our reps until we have the official "TA" language in place. My issue with this, as a member, is that how am I supposed to be giving feedback to my elected LEC representatives if all I have to formulate my concerns is based on hearsay, rumor, and conjecture?
Determine what is most important to you (internet discussion boards be damned) and provide input to your LEC reps accordingly. Also, never forget you are one of 12,000 and we all have opinions, and we all can't share the same view all the time. That is what your MEC and negotiators have to deal with before dealing with the company. Last, I will never forget talking to a guy soon after C2K was ratified telling me he was going to "quit the union, because this new contract is so concessionary." Now the hindsight-is-20/20 view is that C2K was written on tablets and brought down from Mt. Sinai. Your union has to deal with that sort of perspective as well. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1820355)
It's already been reduced once. If profit sharing is anything like scope, it will get worse and worse each contract.
|
Originally Posted by DogWhisperer
(Post 1820420)
Did the pilots get out? Used to fly nuts like this in a beat up old 182...the amount of stress put on those airframes by the squirrels getting out on the struts is huge. Was always a fear of mine that the tail would snap off or a strut would fail...man...the things we did to get here...
The part the video doesn't show was that the trail airplane's pilot was 'high' on the lead, in addition to flying cross-cockpit!! :eek: He lost visual of lead underneath his own instrument panel and tried to acquire by lowering the nose. That's the point where his prop contacted/shredded the empennage of the lead airplane and well, the rest is on video!! #formation-flying-101:rolleyes: It's miraculous nobody was hurt or killed. This 'team' has a history of these 'situations'. |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1820147)
I'll bet the first ever contract to be voted down at Delta will be C2015 if we don't beat AA rates AND keep profit sharing. (Along with no CDO's,)
I agree with you, mind you, but I don't trust the other 51% of the list who toes the company line. If by some crazy chance, I'm there to vote on the next contract, I'll be right there with you on the "No" side of things (under your above scenario). |
It's on the link to the "white paper" report. They can collect all the data they want, but without a change to our contract we get 100 hours unverified. They can't just change it because they perceive some are using too much.
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1820282)
Now that I'm skimming... :D I'm not seeing the on time performance thing, but all the enhancements that I see are coming 13 Feb.
Between the group of us skimming, we make somewhere near a complete brain. And by somewhere near, I mean that in a very general "near-ish-ish" sense. :) |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1820404)
All these posts and not one person can provide a single name of a union official who wants to give away profit sharing. Calling it at risk compensation does not mean you want to give it away. That is a standard term for any type of conditional pay.
I do not know who they MEC members were because I did not ask. I was happy when my rep told me he was opposed to it. |
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 1820368)
I get that, but this was undersold with the 4833 discussion and from what I know, no one realized that touching PS was on the table until it suddenly showed up to essentially pay for a portion of the raise.
If I'm not mistaken we get approx. 1/3 of the PS. Does this mean this reduction paid for roughly 6% of the raise as the company was able to reduce PS to other employee groups? |
Anyone know the current layover hotel in FLL. Trying to find a option under 500.00 for the Miami boat show.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:41 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands