![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1862543)
Looking for advice.
I know someone with a gambling problem. Year after year they continue betting and every year they lose enormous amounts of money.
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1862543)
But what do you do about someone addicted to hedging in the oil futures market?
________________________________________ Sorry for the snark. I read the hedging loss info with the same concern. If the guys making the hedge decisions were low paid nitwits brought in to spin the Wheel Of OPEC for big money - cool. But we've been told by our senior executives that they're really good at this. Prove it. |
Originally Posted by Klondike Bear
(Post 1863057)
Please explain, to me the worst part about their contract is the pay banding. I don't like the idea of how many jobs that would cost in training effiencies.
|
Originally Posted by Klondike Bear
(Post 1863057)
Please explain, to me the worst part about their contract is the pay banding. I don't like the idea of how many jobs that would cost in training effiencies.
I would love to get rid of PBS and go back to line of time. I would love to have their vacation rules. It would be great if the company paid for all my uniforms. Their medical plan is so much better than ours you can't even compare the two. Unless you are talking about their management pilots who basically have no rules and are flown to the FAR max. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1863084)
Management pilots hired off the street 3 months earlier checking pilots there 20 years. The loss of those positions off the list. Pre built scab list. Jobs lost from pay banding, reserves used as seat fillers for sim events constantly while on long call in Anchorage among other places.
One other thing I like that they do is bid two months at a time. It would make planning family trips a lot easier. |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1863083)
We are gonna hire 1000 guys/year. Show me some numbers on the training efficiencies of which you speak
Actually I guess it does and actually makes my point. If we had pay banding we would not need to hire as many as we are now. I don't have any idea how many less but it would be less. |
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 1863049)
AMT SUCKS! Nailed as well. Return was accompanied with a hefty payment which roughly equaled my PS.
|
The whole AMT thing is why I would be FOR some sort of (in addition to the 401k) deferred compensation option in future contracts.
|
A few years ago my wife bought a hybrid. We were suppose to get a $2700 tax CREDIT. Went into AMT. First thing to go was the credit.
|
I'm embarrassed to have to ask, but how does one Deviate from Deadhead on the front end? Thanks.
|
Originally Posted by Klondike Bear
(Post 1863093)
I was talking about UPS and pay banding. None of this has anything to do with us hiring 1000 guys/year.
Actually I guess it does and actually makes my point. If we had pay banding we would not need to hire as many as we are now. I don't have any idea how many less but it would be less. Jerry used to make that argument too. But he never came up with any numbers to prove that it is the catastrophe that it is made out to be. I just can't get on board with it being a bad idea based on hyperbole. I don't believe for a second that it will affect hiring to any measurable degree. We are going to grow at something like 3%/year. If you couple that with the retirements, it's a skeeter on an elephant's butt. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:46 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands