Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
That is great. I would bet most of us do live within our means. However, shouldn't the "means" of an airline pilot be in the same ball park as a Doctor, Laywer, Dentist, etc.????
Right now our means are well below what they should be given who we are and what we do every day at work.
Right now our means are well below what they should be given who we are and what we do every day at work.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
With the 75 hour cap, that is what you got paid. Anything over that went into the "bank", basically an interest free loan to DAL. The beauty of a large bank was vacation month, dropping trips and still coming up with 75. At least that is how I remember it, sorta.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Non-commutable trips are not necessarily a by-product of a higher ADG. In my opinion, it's that the trips are poorly constructed.
Case in point on my last 3 day trip - the first two days were flew 7.1 hours each day, but the last day we didn't leave the overnight until 5pm, and flew 3:20 back to base, getting in at 8:45.
Case in point on my last 3 day trip - the first two days were flew 7.1 hours each day, but the last day we didn't leave the overnight until 5pm, and flew 3:20 back to base, getting in at 8:45.
As far as your last trip, I don't know how they could have modified it in a way that changed your departure for your benefit, or the impact on another rotation. I'd have no way to tell.
It is my understanding that the system is trying to design the least amount of credit time. So you need to look at a number of trips to get a sense of the impact of certain changes. Based on what I'm seeing, since FAR 117 + higher ADG incentivizes and permits longer days, that's exactly what we're getting. Logic tells me that this means less commutable options. The latest memo on the 7ER and 73N trips validates it.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Edit: Doctors are close to us ranging from 120k to 250k depending on the practice. Most from 140 to 200k
Lawyer's Mean Annual Wage - $133,470
Lawyer's Median Annual Wage - $114,970
Pilot's Mean Annual Wage - $131,760
Pilot's Median Annual Wage - $118,140
Family & General Practitioner Mean Annual Wage - $186,320
Family & General Practitioner Median Annual Wage - $180,180
** I wouldn't say "well above" Sailing, but the statistics don't show us too far removed.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
We could even make it TLV + 10, as far as I'm concerned, i.e. get an 89-hour cap back in the contract. With a bow-wave, mind you. That would mean averaging 89-hours throughout the year.
Watch how many guys speak up against it...
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
I know you've brought this up before. It sounds intriguing.
Can you please walk me through the mechanics of it again? How do we make sure it's there when we retire, and doesn't turn into another pension scheme the company can shed in the next downturn?
Can you please walk me through the mechanics of it again? How do we make sure it's there when we retire, and doesn't turn into another pension scheme the company can shed in the next downturn?
No.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Why would we compare ourselves to an attorney, or a doctor anyway? If we were comparing ourselves to either of those, which we shouldn't, we should be compensated proportionally to the certainty of outcome. We should get paid the same as a doctor that almost never loses a patient, or an attorney that wins the vast majority of their cases.
Imagine a doctor @ 99.999999% success rate, or an attorney that could win above 90% of cases. Either one would be paid 7 figures, not 6.
Imagine a doctor @ 99.999999% success rate, or an attorney that could win above 90% of cases. Either one would be paid 7 figures, not 6.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





