Originally Posted by thinkstraight (Post 1869748)

Yeah it seems slow here too. I guess everyone is mesmerized by the goings on in BWI.....

Originally Posted by firstmob (Post 1869716)

Almost as slow and dead as this forum!!!!!!!!!:cool:

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1869317)

Again read the remarks. They grayed out the SWA number and stated it was in error. In a email they said to use the 2012 number as there were no real changes.

Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1869770)

I'm somewhat mad at this forum.




For opening my eyes.


To the wonderful world of...




Airplanes built at home

http://www.rotecaerosport.com/wp-con...ront-close.jpg

Originally Posted by badflaps (Post 1869807)

What is that? What is that? It is not a Rotec-Luscombe, what is that?

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1869316)

The SWA number came from the MIT study.

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1869316)

They grayed it out because the number is in error and put a remark to that effect.

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1869316)

I actually mailed and asked them about it and they said to use the 2012 number.

Originally Posted by badflaps (Post 1869751)

It would be perfect if there was hockey in Baltimore.

Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1869811)

A Kitfox.

Kitfox 3. to be exact. S7 is mostly what they have now but also I think they put the 4 back out.

-Me, talking like I knew this 2 weeks ago.




This isn't a Kitfox but it's pretty cool too. :D

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1869817)

No it didn't sailingfun. That totally discredited MIT study that you wave around showed the 2013 SWA number to be $162,483 which they grayed out with a note saying that data was unreliable. $162,483 is definitely unreliable because that same discredited study showed 2011 SWA numbers of $203,196. SWA didn't drop over $40,000 between 2011 and 2013...so good for them to at least realize that part of their "study" was wrong.

FTB showed the 2013 SWA number to be $229,290 which obviously did not come from the document you love to cite.



See above. They grayed out the SWA number because it was so obviously low.



No you didn't, you made that up too Sailingfun. The 2012 number is also grayed out because it's so obviously low. The 2011 number isn't grayed out and shows $203,196 which, if you must use this wrong study, is at least a little less wrong.

Bottom line is that you keep saying we Delta pilots have the highest average salaries and the highest costs. You're wrong on both counts. Again. I just don't know why you always choose to try to make us look better than we are during contract time. Weird.

Carl

Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 1869842)

Need transportation to the riot?
http://i57.tinypic.com/efez5s.png