![]() |
|
Through sheer bad luck, I'm going to exhaust my allotment of sick time this year. I know it resets June 1, but is there anything to do to not lose pay after exhausting it? I will have gone over about 10 hours. Do I just lose 10 hours credit/pay?
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1870595)
Why have a trade off on work rules to begin with? Especially with productivity? AND to such a level that Ed claimed it was a way to pay for C2012?
As far as offsets there were something like 5 or 6. The big two were reducing when a reserve was full and counting vacations and all known absences when determine full status. Others included increased training and vacation pay and the increase in sick leave. The sick leave part turned out to be far greater then the company expected hence their current fixation with that subject. |
Originally Posted by marcal
(Post 1870633)
Through sheer bad luck, I'm going to exhaust my allotment of sick time this year. I know it resets June 1, but is there anything to do to not lose pay after exhausting it? I will have gone over about 10 hours. Do I just lose 10 hours credit/pay?
|
Originally Posted by marcal
(Post 1870633)
Through sheer bad luck, I'm going to exhaust my allotment of sick time this year. I know it resets June 1, but is there anything to do to not lose pay after exhausting it? I will have gone over about 10 hours. Do I just lose 10 hours credit/pay?
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1870616)
Cannot stop laughing.
You quoted 80... from 2007. Not sure to what end someone needs to "archive" stuff like that. But everyone needs a hobby, I guess. Nu |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1870360)
Hmmm.... if it looks like a Duck, walks like a Duck, Quacks like a Duck...
I wonder what it tastes like! :D |
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 1870697)
Do you really expect an answer to that?....:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1870592)
ALPA did come out and explain exactly what the job loss worst case would be. Their number was a net number looking at the various trade offs. In the areas where we gave up jobs we asked and got offsets in other areas. The net effect was a loss of about 150 jobs system wide. The forum claimed the number was far in excess of that. Block hours compared to headcount show that number to be accurate if not a little pessimistic. Crew planning made no changes in manning assumptions.
|
Originally Posted by 1Bob
(Post 1870703)
The largest offset in job loss was supposed to be the early retirement program. As I recall less than a third of those expected to, actually took it.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1870294)
I think it's OK to speculate on whether one anonymous poster is really the same as a previous anonymous poster.
There's no question bender is tsquare, I just can't imagine why he/she just doesn't bring back tsquare. Carl Perhaps he just wanted to be born again. A do over. A new start. Our maybe the Dixie Mafia was closing in. Never double down on the Vols - three weeks in a row. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands