![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1757369)
Delta's phase-in of voluntary biometric data submission in return for health account credit is clearly a lead-in to demanding the data from us and our families (or else imposing penalties).
Not so fast, says the USEEOC. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1757389)
Interesting post. I think something is terribly wrong with Delta requiring personal data in exchange for full HRA funding, and I agree that this is an area where we have remained too passive.
I can see how what delta is doing could be twisted to mean they weren't fully funding their share of our insurance. However, this started out as a program that paid part of our share. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1757397)
I have to believe this is the slow steady march to obamacare.
The company will surely make a hard run at the DPMP this year. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1757397)
I can see how what delta is doing could be twisted to mean they weren't fully funding their share of our insurance. However, this started out as a program that paid part of our share.
Just because something is voluntary doesn't mean it's legal. Glad the EEOC is taking a look. Personally, you'd think a union would stand up for it's members when it comes to something like this, but we know how that works. I wish ALPA would at least ask some questions about what we value in health insurance outside a contract survey. In a contract survey they ask about so much. A health care survey could get more detailed. DPMA is a contractual benefit - things might be changing enough with the company provided plans that DPMA might be more important in the future. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1757049)
I really was saying goodbye to this place... but I wanted to send you this:
http://i917.photobucket.com/albums/a...ps216bdb16.jpg GBO The Carolina fans were great and we had a great time. Goodbye all. It was fun. TEN |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 1757429)
Yes, but what is to stop them in the future of saying, "give us all sorts of genetic testing or we won't fund our share of the insurance."
Just because something is voluntary doesn't mean it's legal. Glad the EEOC is taking a look. Personally, you'd think a union would stand up for it's members when it comes to something like this, but we know how that works. I wish ALPA would at least ask some questions about what we value in health insurance outside a contract survey. In a contract survey they ask about so much. A health care survey could get more detailed. DPMA is a contractual benefit - things might be changing enough with the company provided plans that DPMA might be more important in the future. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1757049)
I really was saying goodbye to this place... but I wanted to send you this:
http://i917.photobucket.com/albums/a...ps216bdb16.jpg GBO The Carolina fans were great and we had a great time. Goodbye all. It was fun. |
Change of pace, but did we get the NBA contract so we could keep mor 757's?
|
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 1757429)
I wish ALPA would at least ask some questions about what we value in health insurance outside a contract survey. In a contract survey they ask about so much. A health care survey could get more detailed. DPMA is a contractual benefit - things might be changing enough with the company provided plans that DPMA might be more important in the future.
|
Originally Posted by firstmob
(Post 1757479)
Change of pace, but did we get the NBA contract so we could keep mor 757's?
I think this type of deal makes it more likely to lose that contract if they actually own the airplanes. With the current airbus deal we have, they really can't just go out and get someone else to fly all those flights. If they own everything, I'm sure United, American, and any other 757 operator will be bidding to operate their airplanes for them. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:25 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands