Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

hockeypilot44 05-04-2015 06:36 AM


Originally Posted by RetiredFTS (Post 1873310)
Could OE trips be built separate from the general bid packet that will only be awarded to FO's up for OE, then put in open time if there is not an FO/CA upgrade that lines up with that trip? I would think there are some airports that we would want our new pilots to see early and the appropriate number of hours/landings.

With a steady flow of hiring, I would think the number of OE's per fleet/month is fairly predictable to about a 90% solution.

Who's side are you on here? Seriously? Are you on the pilot side or management's side? The first thing you have to learn in a negotiation is that there are two sides to the table.

LeineLodge 05-04-2015 06:41 AM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 1873359)
I agree with Ron, Pd, and Herk. We have a management trial balloon floating before us, and it's an unattractive one at that. Maybe RA said something to a LCA about FO's "sitting home", maybe he didn't. So what? If he starts musing about perdiem, or credit time, or having a seniority-based system, do we try to figure out how to cough those things up?

The only motivations I've identified so far in arguing for modifications to the OE/OE removal system are greed, jealousy, Stockholm Syndrome, or ignorance:

1) I want something else (like a paid APD), so screw "those guys",
2) "Those guys" get a good deal, so screw them,
3) Well, I guess that if you really want to screw those guys, I should help?
4) Oops! I didn't realize that "those guys" actually means me!

Let's focus on things that improve our common lot.

Awesome post. I agree with everything within - even the part about agreeing with PD :p

So how about a different topic since Timbo and Sink have said just about all there is that needs to be said on this one:

How junior will NYC A go on this AE? Any takers on 11,000? 2014 hire?

RockyBoy 05-04-2015 06:56 AM


Originally Posted by LeineLodge (Post 1873365)
How junior will NYC A go on this AE? Any takers on 11,000? 2014 hire?

What was it 10,700 the last bid? I'd say it could easily hit 11,000 on this bid. What's the number of the senior 2014 hire?

Hrkdrivr 05-04-2015 07:01 AM


Originally Posted by RockyBoy (Post 1873373)
What was it 10,700 the last bid? I'd say it could easily hit 11,000 on this bid. What's the number of the senior 2014 hire?

11,2XX. It could easily happen.

Hawaii50 05-04-2015 07:11 AM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1873325)
I just don't understand why we're working this hard to solve the company's problem--and to our own QOL detriment!

I have to totally agree as well. Once a QOL item is negotiated away, it never returns. Many of the things that made this a great career are gone. Those things were in contracts to alleviate the beat down that doing this for a living can put on you over the long term. We need to be very careful about any further lifestyle erosion. Good luck to 112XX.

NERD 05-04-2015 08:31 AM

What is it with LCAs and SIM instructors constantly selling managements theory that we use too much sick leave? Everyone I have on the jumpseat or in theirs is spewing this.

Flamer 05-04-2015 08:49 AM


Originally Posted by NERD (Post 1873420)
What is it with LCAs and SIM instructors constantly selling managements theory that we use too much sick leave? Everyone I have on the jumpseat or in theirs is spewing this.

Well, I say we use the least. And until someone provides some fully transparent data I'm just as right as anyone else.

Start telling everyone you know that we use the least.

CheapTrick 05-04-2015 08:50 AM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 1873359)
I agree with Ron, Pd, and Herk. We have a management trial balloon floating before us, and it's an unattractive one at that. Maybe RA said something to a LCA about FO's "sitting home", maybe he didn't. So what? If he starts musing about perdiem, or credit time, or having a seniority-based system, do we try to figure out how to cough those things up?

The only motivations I've identified so far in arguing for modifications to the OE/OE removal system are greed, jealousy, Stockholm Syndrome, or ignorance:.

When asked what the company wanted, RA started with removing inefficiencies from the contract. The first (maybe only) inefficiency mentioned was FOs bidding w/LCAs.

So I'd guess that DAL will be asking DALPA amend that portion of the contract. We all know that DALPA will be happy to throw that small bone the company's way. DALPA isn't going to fight for something that affects a tiny number of pilots. DALPA will give it up with a few other tiny inefficiences, negotiate a new sick leave bank, and agree on industry leading pay rates. We'll be voting this fall.

The script is pretty well written and rehersals are in full swing. If you want a see a different play, I'd be calling the writers, director, and producer now. But I'd say it is too late. Done deal. JMO

CheapTrick 05-04-2015 09:03 AM


Originally Posted by Flamer (Post 1873427)
Well, I say we use the least. And until someone provides some fully transparent data I'm just as right as anyone else.

Start telling everyone you know that we use the least.

It won't work. I felt like you do. Then I saw the data. I came away going "No wonder the company is ****ed about sick leave." The stats are damning. And surprizing. I was very irritated that I had to sit in a sick leave abuse briefing and I came out the other side realizing I was wrong. We've got some guys impressively abusing the sick leave benefits. And the worst abusing categories are younger FO's and anyone over 64.

sailingfun 05-04-2015 09:07 AM


Originally Posted by CheapTrick (Post 1873428)
When asked what the company wanted, RA started with removing inefficiencies from the contract. The first (maybe only) inefficiency mentioned was FOs bidding w/LCAs.

So I'd guess that DAL will be asking DALPA amend that portion of the contract. We all know that DALPA will be happy to throw that small bone the company's way. DALPA isn't going to fight for something that affects a tiny number of pilots. DALPA will give it up with a few other tiny inefficiences, negotiate a new sick leave bank, and agree on industry leading pay rates. We'll be voting this fall.

The script is pretty well written and rehersals are in full swing. If you want a see a different play, I'd be calling the writers, director, and producer now. But I'd say it is too late. Done deal. JMO

Your post confuses me. We lost staying home on IOE's in the 1113 contract. DALPA fought to get it back and succeeded. When we got it back this web board gave DALPA zero credit and said it was of little or no value. Now with the mere mention of it going away it's suddenly has huge value!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands