![]() |
|
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 2208347)
Next on the list, LAX 320.....;)
|
Originally Posted by Ed Harley
(Post 2208426)
Unfortunately, I don't think this will result in a net increase in MSP pilot positions. According to a FB post, Delta won't increase MSP pilot base until the Minnesota Family Leave Act and sick policy is changed.
Well, assuming they can afford to peel a few million from the billions they're lighting on fire. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by jamesbond
(Post 2208204)
don't know yet. Haven't seen the package. But it reduces flying at dci for starters, so that is a good thing as far as i can tell at this point.
|
Originally Posted by Ed Harley
(Post 2208426)
Unfortunately, I don't think this will result in a net increase in MSP pilot positions. According to a FB post, Delta won't increase MSP pilot base until the Minnesota Family Leave Act and sick policy is changed.
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 2208554)
Am I to understand that minneapolis-based Pilots can use their sick leave for family leave, like family appointments and dependent illness? Or is it based on the Pilot's residence?
http://www.dli.mn.gov/LS/Pdf/sick_leave.pdf |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 2208580)
Minnesota employers must comply with Minnesota labor law. Residence can be outside the state.
http://www.dli.mn.gov/LS/Pdf/sick_leave.pdf |
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 2208588)
That's fantastic. If I were a commuter contemplating MSP vs DTW, I'd favor the latter based on that policy difference alone. Someone displaced out of MSP might even have a case to maintain that benefit.
http://www.ncsl.org/research/labor-a...eave-laws.aspx |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 2208580)
Minnesota employers must comply with Minnesota labor law. Residence can be outside the state.
http://www.dli.mn.gov/LS/Pdf/sick_leave.pdf The best option is to go for a me too clause in the contract. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2208615)
I am not sure you are reading that correctly. It's a bullet point letter not actual language. Most pilots not living in Minneapolis claim for tax purposes they don't live or work in the state. A pilot domicle is not under most legal definitions a place of work. Claiming you do work in MSP might lead to some unwanted tax effects. I have no idea what Delta's policy on this is however I suspect they have full researched it.
The best option is to go for a me too clause in the contract. I think it would be fair and just if every employee had this benefit. This is not an issue we need to bargain for. Delta has a lot of places of employment in a lot of areas that have family benefits. They will be challenged by 1 of their 80,000+ employees and then change this to a company wide policy. Of course they would like to set the precedent with the pilots first to extract a give. Then the rest of the company will be gifted the benefit the pilots paid for. See: failed profit sharing reductions |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2208615)
I am not sure you are reading that correctly. It's a bullet point letter not actual language. Most pilots not living in Minneapolis claim for tax purposes they don't live or work in the state. A pilot domicle is not under most legal definitions a place of work. Claiming you do work in MSP might lead to some unwanted tax effects. I have no idea what Delta's policy on this is however I suspect they have full researched it.
The best option is to go for a me too clause in the contract. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands