Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

johnso29 01-05-2010 10:23 AM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 738286)
Hey Johnson! You've go the Airbus pic back up there. Congratulations! :D

Thanks new! :) The DC9 will always have a place in my heart, but she's just too leaky & hot for me. ;)

80ktsClamp 01-05-2010 10:34 AM


Originally Posted by NuGuy (Post 738228)
Heyas 80,

If you ever go to a fNWA airplane, you might bug some fNWA guy who flew it for their copies of the NWA Vol1/Vol2. Additional resources never hurt, and NWA manuals were some of the very best I'd ever seen (lovingly illustrated in-house by two of the nicest ladies you'd ever meet).

Nu

Yeah, I downloaded the 320 manuals before bid period 5 transition to make sure I could still have them if I ended up on it.

Why, oh, why did we use the Boeing books instead of those? It would be so easy to keep sopa/smac around and still ensure technique is allowed...

scambo1 01-05-2010 10:41 AM


Originally Posted by RockyBoy (Post 738353)
Yep, I agree. If we are going to do the AK thing, we should do it now. I'd imagine a merger with them would be very easy for the integration teams to pull off. The teams are still in place, know exactly what to do, and it is a common fleet type which should be very easy for them. Maybe they will give us another 5% restoration for "supporting" the merger.

------------
I'd hope they melded our rates with AS 737 rates and work outward from there. It's a little more than 5%.

Whatever happens to JAL route wise is not for us (as pilots) to choose, thats a business decision pure and simple. What is for us to choose is how we (as a union and pilots) would reach out to those affected by this (potential) turn of events.

I am hopeful for a JAL JV. The skyteam currently is the place to be. I also support a bid for AS and think sooner is better - despite the pain on both sides.

1-5 years from now, IMO there will be a reduction in global airline capacity. So I don't look at this JAL move as just a win in Asia, but instead an added essential element to our global airline network. In the future, personally, I'd like to be one of the folks that still has a job and I think the skyteam will be one of the survivors.

Check me off as bullish on skyteam.

Herkflyr 01-05-2010 10:51 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 738370)
Yeah, I downloaded the 320 manuals before bid period 5 transition to make sure I could still have them if I ended up on it.

Why, oh, why did we use the Boeing books instead of those? It would be so easy to keep sopa/smac around and still ensure technique is allowed...

At DAL-S we used to have some very good, detailed in-house books as well--in most respects much better, I believe, than the Boeing books we use now.

I have heard that liability was the reason we went to Boeing books. I've also heard that since Boeing's (simplistic) books were sold to operators worldwide, if we used them as well, we could do the training for other airline's crews, using the same books, and make more $$ in the process.

I'm sure your pre-merger books were far superior, as our old ones were.

Free Bird 01-05-2010 10:54 AM


Originally Posted by RockyBoy (Post 738353)
Maybe they will give us another 5% restoration for "supporting" the merger.


Well, even after our last 4% raise on Jan. 1, we're still paid less than American pilots are. Im thinking much bigger numbers :D

Rhino Driver 01-05-2010 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 738343)
Any of you FNW's know what the limits of the 5th freedom rights are? Is it specific countries or just a specific number of departures per day/week?

Anyone remember what the book value of the DAL stock the pilots was when it was issued???

JAL does a NRT-YVR and NRT-DEL and didn't know if that is something that could be done via that authority.

Not that I advocate taking the flying but would it even be a possibility?

Long term this is good for DAL....short term not so sure.....

The market value of the stock when issued to the pilots was $4.28. That's been a very good return thus far! I'm still hangin on.:D

80ktsClamp 01-05-2010 11:00 AM


Originally Posted by Herkflyr (Post 738382)
At DAL-S we used to have some very good, detailed in-house books as well--in most respects much better, I believe, than the Boeing books we use now.

I have heard that liability was the reason we went to Boeing books. I've also heard that since Boeing's (simplistic) books were sold to operators worldwide, if we used them as well, we could do the training for other airline's crews, using the same books, and make more $$ in the process.

I'm sure your pre-merger books were far superior, as our old ones were.


I've heard similar reports on the old DAL-S books.


I'm a southie, by the way.

newKnow 01-05-2010 11:01 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 738319)
No matter what this deal give us I still get to go to at least one if not two schools this year.

Timeline for these type of things run years. Just remember that.

I am very Pro-JAL-DAL. It is a deal that will do a great many things for this corporation. It better translate in to good news for us too, but in the end, we NEED the deal. We also NEED to keep AS or buy about 50 73N's to perform the flying they are doing for us.

If we have to merge with AS to keep them, I hope we just buy the 50 73N's instead, because I'd hate to see us all abandon our SLI positions we fought for to "the death" just 12 short months ago.

North guys would have to abandon our DOH argument. (I think. What is the DOH of the senior AK pilot?)

South guys would have to abandon their "But, you are getting a payraise" argument. (unless you advocate their 737 pilots coming in above our 7er pilots. I think they get paid more.)

If the JAL deal goes thru, I do think AMR goes after AK, big time.

What fun. Does the ride ever end? :)

sailingfun 01-05-2010 11:07 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 738370)
Yeah, I downloaded the 320 manuals before bid period 5 transition to make sure I could still have them if I ended up on it.

Why, oh, why did we use the Boeing books instead of those? It would be so easy to keep sopa/smac around and still ensure technique is allowed...

Delta wrote and used their own books until about 5 years ago. They were great books. Full sized and lots of nice pictures. I still have my 767 and 727 books. They told us at the time that we went to the Boeing books because it was a liability issue and the lawyers and insurance had driven the change.

forgot to bid 01-05-2010 11:12 AM

I was talking to the person who wrote the FCTM for the MD88, my understanding is our "Boeing" books were actually written in house based off the 777 manual or the 767 manual and then made to match. Or maybe that was just the case on the 88.

I agree with 80, download the 320, 9, 330 or 744 manuals while they're still good lookin.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands