Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

LOBO 03-09-2010 05:43 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 776226)

We are getting CPDLC on the 767ER's that can get retrofitted


I thought we had this on a few birds already.

80ktsClamp 03-09-2010 05:46 PM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 776294)
I would think that even if it was true the real question would be how soon would airlines have to comply. One would think that it would be over the course of a year minimum, as immediate compliance would not be feasible. Although I wouldn't mind it. :p

I had heard that it would more or less be a wash for mainline.... the regionals however.....

DAL4EVER 03-09-2010 06:07 PM


Originally Posted by beer (Post 776285)
Need someone to do some digging and verify this:

Some folks at ASA had a meeting with some folks at Delta and some info came out that if the FAA imposes the restriction on flight time and duty day, that Delta would immediately need 1400 more pilots!!!!!

I guess it restricts the amount of legs per day!?!?

Anyone Anyone Bueler Bueler??

An interesting question would be how this will impact the non-wholly owneds. Assuming a Fee-for-Departure arrangement, that could severely impact the bottom line at these companies. Most regionals have no trip/duty rigs but this in essence would create that. At companies that fly short haul trips mostly this could require a huge amount of staffing. Could they absorb that cost if it doesn't get transferred to the mainline partner. I don't have the ASA's of the regionals available but most of the time they don't have the ability to pass those costs up to the mothership. One reason why ASA, Pinnacle and others have been stuck in negotiations for years. The turnip is so dry there's no other places to cut costs to absorb that increase.

acl65pilot 03-09-2010 06:08 PM

trust me, if the proposed duty rigs that ALPA put forth are those adopted, we may need 400 more pilots. ASA otoh would need a ton.
Think of the regional airlines going to our hours of service rules.

Now with a few other things, we could see a need for the numbers you indicate but not for what the proposed rigs would be. If it added that many pilots I would be floored. We have a max of 13 hrs of sked duty and the limit would be 12.
Keep in mind if the nine hr flight time rule comes out we are looking at all of the dinner and a movie Caribbean day lines going to two an crews. (with a pwa change of course)

acl65pilot 03-09-2010 06:09 PM

Dal, you hit the nail on the head. FFD and DCI would be a major money loser. Bigger jets would be the way to go.

acl65pilot 03-09-2010 06:11 PM


Originally Posted by LOBO (Post 776295)
I thought we had this on a few birds already.

We have a poor man's version of it. From what I was told it will be like the 777 CPDLC. (much better) :D

acl65pilot 03-09-2010 06:12 PM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 776294)
I would think that even if it was true the real question would be how soon would airlines have to comply. One would think that it would be over the course of a year minimum, as immediate compliance would not be feasible. Although I wouldn't mind it. :p

I have heard some numbers over the next two years and if half true, you might hold a line! : D

Professor 03-09-2010 06:15 PM


Originally Posted by LOBO (Post 776295)
I thought we had this on a few birds already.

Nah. I'm a path of least resistance sort of dude.

As are almost ALL of my brothers and sisters in JFK, I ASSURE you if there were a time saving device on the ER...we would know about it.

johnso29 03-09-2010 06:25 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 776327)
I have heard some numbers over the next two years and if half true, you might hold a line! : D

I'll be happy to hold the baby bus. A line would be nice too though. :D

Scoop 03-09-2010 06:26 PM

Paper? Really....... no ****? Not enough paper in the cockpit?

First off, DAL probably clears a few acres of rain forest every year with just the NOTAMS.

Secondly, we should all - both North and South, look at the bright side - a few months after the first combined bid and guys are *****ing about cockpit amenities- damm this merger is going smooth from a pilots point of view.

Does anyone think the guys at USAIR are *****ing about lack of paper in the cockpit?

Finally for all of us Southerners - lets just remember the North guys have a lot more change to deal with then we do. Hey North guys - DAL does not have the market cornered on crappy procedures, policies, and protocols - the world is full of it.

Not enough paper in the cockpit - Classic! :)

Scoop


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:44 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands